I have really gone tired about posting over this subject here on AZBilliards, but since you mentioned my post in the thread about WPA, I'll copy and paste it:
**********************
The WPA consist of members organizations from all over the world, check
http://www.wpa-pool.com/index.asp?content=member
I know that the system is not working properly in USA, but in for example Europe it works like this.
I am a member of Kvitsoy Biljardklubb. This is a small poolclub, with only 20 members. Still, we have 1 vote at the yearly Genearl Meeting in the Norwegian Pool Federation. (Bigger clubs get more votes). Here we discuss things like new rules, tournaments, budget etc.
The Norwegian Pool Federation are responsible to make sure that there are tournaments all over the country, for juniors, women, men, in 8-ball, 9-ball, 10-ball and 14-1, and for all kind of levels. We have 7 yearly regional tournaments in Division 1 and Divison 2, and Division 3 tournaments each week. (5 regions)
Players in a lower division can play in tournaments in higher divisions. At the highest level we have 7 national tournaments, including the Norwegian Championships in 8-ball, 9-ball, 10-ball and 14-1. These tournaments are open to all Norwegians.
No tournaments are played with hcp, and there are little price money to get. We are playing for the ranking, and at the end of the year the top players at the National Ranking will get spots in the European Championships so they can represent Norway.
Players in lower divisions will move up a Division if their rankings are good.
The entryfees of each tournament, in all divisions, is split like this:
20 % Norwegian Pool Federation
20 % Pool Hall
20 % Club (local organizer, TD)
20 % Pricemoney
20 % Pricefund for the Norwegian Master, last tournament of the year.
A lot, if not all, European countries have a system like or similar to this.
Then we have the EPBF.
They have a European Tour, the Eurotour. Here players are fighting for points. This tour is open for all players, but many countries/federations choose to sponsor their best players, based on the national ranking, into these tournaments.
The ranking on the Eurotour + the European Championships determines who will go to World Pool Masters, Mosconi Cup, World 8-ball, World 14-1, World 9-ball, World Ten Ball, Qatar Open, China Open, Philippine Open and the rest of the new WPA Tour.
All members/countries of the EPBF have the right to compete at the European Championships, in 8-ball, 9-ball, 14-1 and Teams.
I believe that the WPA's goal is to build organisations like this all over the world, make sure that all tournaments are played with the same rules, same format, using proper dresscode etc.
Now we have tournaments in 6-ball, 7-ball, 8-ball, 9-ball, 1-pocket, banks, rotation, 14-1, 6-pocket, 10-ball, trickshots, carom, snooker, 6ball snooker etc.
WPA wants to limit the games to as few as possible, to make it easier for the public and players, and their "sanctioned" games as of now are only 8-ball, 9-ball, 10-ball and 14-1.
The WPA's job is to make sure that every country has a chance of playing in a World Championship. If a Norwegian wants to compete in the World Ten Ball Championship he will have to perform well at either the Eurotours or at the European Championships, or to win a qualifier.
Since the WPA is trying to make pool more like a sport, they need to have certain rules for how tournaments are held, and what can be approved as a WPA-sanctioned tournament. You have different kind of levels here, and I believe World Championships are the highest level.
At a World Championship you have to provide a certain amount of $$$, referees etc.
I believe Dragon failed on atleast those two criterias this time, unfortunately, and I think the decision of the WPA was good.
I have probably done some mistakes in this post, and hope other people can correct it if so. Anyway, I hope I have helped some of you to understand why we need a WPA, and why we all should support it.
Brian,
I was hoping one of our European or Asian members would step in and give us some guidance.
I believe Roy Steffensen wrote at length about how the Norwiegn sanctioning body recognizes local clubs. They recognize, train and promote young prospects. How tournaments are structured with payouts tied to the local clubs and the individuals. Each European country probably has a similar set up. I'm hoping Roy will see this post and correct whatever errors I've made in describing his post. Any errors are certainly not intentional. My excuse is I'm old and my memory is fading.
We have dozens of great young players. Some still waiting to be recognized. How will they be supported by the game we love? Adding fan base will grow the number of players (possibly consumers of billiard fare). But, as the thread title suggests, "why is there no single US organization". My answer again is Money. And that leads me to suggest each sanctioning body (BCAPL, VNEA, ACS, TAP, APA, UPA, CSI, etc) is vying for the golden ticket. Perhaps not from our viewpoint but from theirs, the US Olympic representative! At the highest level, pool is not about me and my love for the game. It is about money. Perhaps more accurately PROFIT!
If the number of Olympic viewers has declined, is it possible offering the programing on a variety of channels, at all hours of the day has saturated the audience? I don't need to watch basket weaving at three in the morning.
Finally, my guess is there are a lot of people here on AZ waiting for another "Hustler" movie to get the game going. That is a dream! Thank you for disagreeing. That is what these forums and threads are about!
Lyn