Was it the super thin cut shot lined up down the middle of the table?Well, they tied at 11-11 and went to a shootout. Potts made 2 of 5, Zhang made 1 of 5.
Potts is the winner!
Well, they tied at 11-11 and went to a shootout. Potts made 2 of 5, Zhang made 1 of 5.
Potts is the winner!
Was it the super thin cut shot lined up down the middle of the table?
What a horrible way to end it. Why make the match race to 19 and then have a time limit to end the match? They were not playing slow, there was a shot clock even...
I didn't get this either, there was a possible further 15 racks to play, no way they have had enough time, really should have been 2 ahead sudden death at least.
Yes. CB on the head spot (if they call it that) and OB on the long string about one diamond (although the tables have no diamonds) off the foot rail.
The earlier matches were subject to a time limit, also. But was the Final subject to the same 140-minute limit, even though it was, ostensibly, "best of 37"? And I agree about the pace of play -- it was fine.
The shootout was simply shooting the same thin cut shot 5 times. To me, that's not an interesting or good way to end a significant event.
I think they want to have that penalty shoot-out feeling of a soccer match. But with pool it feels strange..