So did I.okinawa77 said:I left Aramith an email.
okinawa77 said:Mosconiac,
If the black circle is lighter, wouldn't it give more action, than the red circle?
Which CB do you think is the best?
The black circle, being lighter than most object balls you will encounter, will draw better than the red circle. Conversely, the red circle will follow better with the same set of object balls. If you run into the el cheapo object balls I measured at 5.61 ounces, not much will help your draw stroke.okinawa77 said:Mosconiac,
If the black circle is lighter, wouldn't it give more action, than the red circle?
Which CB do you think is the best?
CrownCityCorey said:IMO the best cue ball to use, is the one that comes with the set.
You may not be following through deliberatly. It only takes a very light stroke to draw the ball. I see people trying to hit it too hard, and their cue ends up not even hitting the cue ball where they want to, or the cue ball can have way to much forward momentum to even come back.
Lastly, "make sure the balls are clean!"
John Schmidt - 2008
Scott Lee said:
Yes sir, that Aramith magnetic ball is definitely ugly and resembles the original mud ball but not as ugly. It's just a lot lighter.CrownCityCorey said:See, that would be similar to what I always thought a "mudball" was.
I wish they gave detailed info about the balls here: http://www.saluc.com/html/billiard/index.php?idlien=13
mosconiac - Try the same experiment that I did.mosconiac said:I just got a chance to weigh another common cue ball. Here it is:
Aramith "red logo" CB: 5.96 oz
This cue ball is heavier than the measels and red circle cueballs we are used to seeing. Interestingly, it is nearly identical in weight to the green logo (magnetic) cueball.
cigardave said:mosconiac - Try the same experiment that I did.
Simultaneously drop both your measles cue ball and your Aramith red logo cue ball from mid-chest height onto a smooth concrete floor... and see how high each one rebounds... and report back.
tia, cd.
The two that I mentioned in the post that you quoted... a Super Aramith Pro Cup (measles) and a Super Aramith Pro (red logo). See (my) post #43 for the results. They were surprising.Ballistic Billiards said:What balls have you measured this way?
Thanks!
Ballistic Billiards said:I've heard that the red circle ball is made of carom ball material and is
more elastic than the pro cup (measle) ball which is to be made from
the same material as the object balls.
I will run this experiment the next time I can, and report my findings, unless
someone else has opportunity before I.
IMO, this is a pretty good test for elasticity.
Thanks!
softshot said:you mean to tell me... its the CUE BALL?????
WOW what a burden off of my shoulders LOL
for a while there I thought I was misjudging my stroke... but its been the cueball holding me back all the while...
BOY DO I FEEL STUPID!!!
do they make a low deflection cueball yet???...... I'd pay ooohhh $200 for one... here is an Idea we could cut regular cheap cueballs into orange type slices and reverse the grain....every other slice... market the hell out of them and sponsor a few tours.. and poof you have the perfect marriage.. the predator PIE... with a fruit cueball..... you have a fruit pie....
fruit pie .... a person who honestly believes that minor variances in equipment will separate the best players from each other... or for that matter mediocre players from each other...
I'll settle for any cueball as long as we both have to use it...
The measle ball is actually a lil heavier than the normal cue balls. That is why you have trouble using draw. To get the same amount of draw you will have to either hit lower on the ball or hit a lil harder. Hope this helps anybody.:thumbup:Meezer Girl said:I have never had any issues using follow with the red circle.
I have found that I have issues with the measle ball - it seems "sluggish" compared to the red circle and I sometimes have trouble getting the draw that I want. I thought it was just me but then a couple of local very good players said the same thing. Seems like most people just jumped on the measle ball so they could "see the english" - I know what I put on the ball, I don't need to "watch it" !!!!
I second this post.......:thumbup:softshot said:you mean to tell me... its the CUE BALL?????
WOW what a burden off of my shoulders LOL
for a while there I thought I was misjudging my stroke... but its been the cueball holding me back all the while...
BOY DO I FEEL STUPID!!!
do they make a low deflection cueball yet???...... I'd pay ooohhh $200 for one... here is an Idea we could cut regular cheap cueballs into orange type slices and reverse the grain....every other slice... market the hell out of them and sponsor a few tours.. and poof you have the perfect marriage.. the predator PIE... with a fruit cueball..... you have a fruit pie....
fruit pie .... a person who honestly believes that minor variances in equipment will separate the best players from each other... or for that matter mediocre players from each other...
I'll settle for any cueball as long as we both have to use it...
After reading this post I notice you weighed the measle as lighter? Have there been different measle balls over the last few years?cigardave said:Not in my experience.
After I bought my Diamond table this summer, which came with a brand new set of Super Aramith Pro balls (with red Aramith logo cue ball), I also bought a Super Aramith Pro Cup "Measles" cue ball and weighed both cue balls.
The (new) red Aramith logo cue ball weighed 168 g. (5.93 oz.)... and the (new) Super Aramith Pro Cup "Measles" cue ball weighed 162 g. (5.71 oz.)... for almost a 0.25 oz. difference with the Measles ball being the lighter of the two.
I also weighed all of the object balls in my Super Aramith Pro ball set and they all weighed within one (1) gram of the red Aramith logo cue ball... most all were 168 g. and a couple were 167 g. iirc.
tucson9ball said:After reading this post I notice you weighed the measle as lighter? Have there been different measle balls over the last few years?