These greatest of all time lists are impossible to do. Lists should be based on eras not all time.
say like:
1.) 1880 to 1920
2.) 1920 to 1950
3.) 1950 to 1980
4.) 1980 to present
Then you can have real comparisons within each era. And now if you want to make an all time list you can take the best from each era and combine them for fun. But how can you rank a billiard player from 1891 with a nine ball player from 2005?
Just doesn't work. Too many never ending agreements. Equipment was different as well.
Separated by eras for sure....also by specific games played....
...and gender...I have a beef with any list that puts Allison Fisher ahead
of Harold Worst....and many other names mentioned.
And I can find a lot of names on that list that nobody in their right mind
would bet on against Ronnie Allen in an all-round..or Corn-bread Red.
These lists are good for a spirited conversation...but the over-view???
...they are BS
It would be nice if someone would do a rational list and state the
criteria for the order....hmm...is Bob Jewett busy...Geo Fels..????
I have found around action rooms that the BS stops when the betting
starts.....I think that if I could create some match-ups where I disagree
with the order and also who got left off...there would be some shuffling.