David, did I meet you a long time ago, in the Portland, OR area, wasn't you building pool tables back then and ask me about building American made coin-operated pool tables?
Glen
No we have never met Sir.
David, did I meet you a long time ago, in the Portland, OR area, wasn't you building pool tables back then and ask me about building American made coin-operated pool tables?
Glen
Diamond 9' Pro Am's are used in many of the most prestigious tour events around the world.... from the US Open, to Derby City, to The TAR table in Vegas where the greatest players in the world match up for big $$$.
Do you honestly think that those are, as you say "gaff" tables?
Don't you think maybe, just maybe the engineers at Diamond and Artemis would have figured out the correct orientation of the cushions?
Yes, Diamond did make a change to their subrail specs a few years ago to help the tables bank better, but that change had nothing to do with the rubber being "upside down".
Glen...what other pool tables do you know of that have the hump side of the cushion on the bottom?
Cause I sure can't think of one......but if anyone knows.....I'm sure that would be YOU.
Mark Gregory
Glen...what other pool tables do you know of that have the hump side of the cushion on the bottom?
Cause I sure can't think of one......but if anyone knows.....I'm sure that would be YOU.
Mark Gregory
I believe Artemis has been selling carom rubber and NOT supplying the proper information. Do you think this may involve salesmen? What does a salesman know about pool? Take a look at thier web site, billiard rubber is a very small part of thier company. I'm not sure they know what POOL is.
These great touranments are held on near new covered tables and I still see some of these champs shoot a lot of short banks. Sometimes I see them avoid shape on a bank and choose a harder shot instead. I am also starting to see older matches on GCs that if you look close you can see the round side down on the side rail at the corner pocket. The champs havbe a hard time on them to.
Here is something else that has come to my attention, the Artemis Intercontinental POOL No.66 rubber HAS changed, if you have a NEW Muellers catalog have a look. The new rubber is pool rubber not carom rubber. They have been selling carom rubber for pool without giving proper instruction IMO. I stated before, I have installed carom rubber upside down because I just didn't know any better.
Artemis has been selling both the K55 and K66 profile cushions, there's no secret sales bait and switch taking place. The K55 profile cushions are primarily used on billiard tables, but Diamond decided to try them on their pool tables as a more reliable cushion, and they worked out well. Change is hard for some to accept I guess, and yes they contact the object ball above the equator as you've explained, as with ALL cushions. The center of the object ball is 1 1/8", and ALL cushions come into contact above that point. We tried the Artemis K66 profile cushions on a Diamond table, they didn't play as well as the K55 cushions did, so we opted not to use them as they don't play well on sub-rails 1 11/16" thick, they play best on 1 5/8" sub-rails with a 1 3/8" nose height.
Where have YOU been, Gabriels has been using the Artemis K66 profile cushions on their pool tables for YEARS, so what's so new about them?
Seems like a lot of worry for nothing. If Artemis has in fact changed their cushion profile(s) in some way, the table makers will either adjust their rails, or simply choose not to employ them.
Either they will fit and work, or they won't. (And rails will have to be adjusted)
Mechanics will learn to use them, or they won't.
Whatever the case, I can assure you that Artemis is not going about their business in a Willy-nilly manor. If they changed something, I'm sure there was a good reason.
I hope you understand that, as it is now, there is but a tiny difference between the K55 and K66 cushion profile. The 55 being slightly thicker, which would be better for heavier carom balls. But beyond that slight difference, the two profiles are designed to perform precisely the same, when installed at the proper height and angle.
I know they have been selling K66, it is called "Artemis Pool No.66", what they have been selling for K55 is called "Artemis Intercontinental pool No.66" exact same as the Artemis Carom rubber. Thier NEW Intercontinental No.66 is totaly differant... WHY??? Have they been getting complaints??? Is there a problem that nobody is talking about? Why the change?
In the 80s and 90s one could not find 10ft. pool rubber so you had to buy carom rubber to do 10ft. pool tables. Doing antique conversions (carom to pool) is the first time I used No.66 on a pool table, after having learned from my carom table f*** up I installed it fabric side down and the rails play great.
I sorry this thred has the Diamond name on it, I started the thred just to vent about a hard day working on tables I was not familiar with.(been part timer for the past 10 years or so) I am lucky to have a very knowledgeable partner or I would be doing the same as everyone when installing this bubber.
I am NOT trying to bad mouth any mechanics or the Diamond Co. but I do blame Artemis and thier supplyiers for not putting out proper information.
I will post pics tonight, catalog is at my shop.
Seems like a lot of worry for nothing. If Artemis has in fact changed their cushion profile(s) in some way, the table makers will either adjust their rails, or simply choose not to employ them.
Either they will fit and work, or they won't. (And rails will have to be adjusted)
Mechanics will learn to use them, or they won't.
Whatever the case, I can assure you that Artemis is not going about their business in a Willy-nilly manor. If they changed something, I'm sure there was a good reason.
I hope you understand that, as it is now, there is but a tiny difference between the K55 and K66 cushion profile. The 55 being slightly thicker, which would be better for heavier carom balls. But beyond that slight difference, the two profiles are designed to perform precisely the same, when installed at the proper height and angle.
You know as well as I do, Diamond is the only table manufacture that uses the Artemis Intercontinental K55 profile cushions, in fact if Diamond had decided not to use it when they did, you'd have never seen it, or installed it in the course of working on rails. For several years now everyone that we've rebuilt rails for have done nothing but compliments how their tables play. I've never had one complaint from anyone about how the cushions play years after the jobs have been finished, and neither have you. Diamond decided to use the Artemis cushions because they were the K55 profile, even though it's been used as a billiard cushion for many years. If we were talking about billiard tables using these cushions, this conversation wouldn't even be taking place.
No Sir, Artemis hss BEEN selling K66 and carom rubber cut at 48" lenths that only matches K55 when it is fabric side down. The NEW Intercontinental No 66 has changed, it is shown with fabric on top and has different dimensions. This is not yet posted in the Mueller web site but is in the new catalog. I will post pics tonight.. If this is not an issue, why the change.
There is not one rubber in any catalog or on any pool, carom or snooker table with the round side down that I have ever seen. I challange anyone to show me any other example.
I didn't ask about how my customers feel about the Artemis cushion....I've had a lot of guy's ask me why after 6 months or so the table speeds up and starts to back short.
Mark Gregory
I've never had them calls from my customers 6 months later but I'll check with my "students" to see if any of them have just for you, OK
Glen