Bandana Joe,
To me, the HOF is about "WHO WAS THE BEST". Two of the considerations into the HOF are championships won and gambling match ups.
Shannon Daulton has excelled at both. And he's been a top player since he was in middle school! I don't agree that because he accomplished so much at such a young age that he should be penalized by waiting for all the guys older than him to get in ahead of him. If I follow your thinking, Shannon should have to wait till he's in his 60's or 70's to get inducted???
Something else to consider. Mulitiple candidates can be inducted each year. Having Shannon get in does not exclude someone else worthy also getting inducted this year. I'm voting for several of the guys we've already mentioned. San Jose Dick is a real gem of a guy, Ervolino, while better at 14.1 than 1P, certainly deserves recognition. Not enough good things can be said about Jose Parica, Allen Hopkins and Buddy Hall. BUT,
my point is that in one on one match ups with these power-houses, I would have to bet on Shannon if the game was One Pocket or banks. How can that point even be debated when his credentials are matched up with these other great players?
The HOF should be about great players. Great players win championships.
Count how many major championships Daulton has. To me, this is such an easy decision. The only point of controversy is whether he should be penalized and made to wait until he's an AARP member because he was so great so young.