you must be asking Glen because I was at your shop, I heard that you can even setup a table in the snow, is that correct?
Here is the latest tooling in my full-service shop. I will post more pictures if you like, but this will get you the idea. The fixture is 6" high and 61" long made out of reinforced channel. I machined it to slide in the T-slot of the 10x54 Milling machine since it only has 32" of travel with the dro's installed. The fixture accepts all styles of rails including T rails for antiques, all rails bolt to the fixture in the same manner as the installation on the slate. The same stresses are on the rail so a warped rail can be cut perfectly. There is some alignment on GC style rails with the floating nut plate design, but you have 2 accurate faces to measure off for parallel. Let me know what you think!
Rob
PS; this is far more accurate than how the factory does it.. though it takes about 1.5 hours to do a set
View attachment 113339
John, I've never been against doing something new....if it makes sense and is usable in the field by othersIf something that should be easy to do can only be done in a shop, then it's not realistic to look toward doing something that way....because I don't have a shop...unless I'm at the Diamond factory. So then I have to come up with ways of doing what I want done in the field.
Glen
So, how do you get the "tool" to cut straight when the featherstrip recess is not straight?
Chuckle
Still a great tool, just not for all rails....send me the ones you can't get straight and I'll take my time and make them right. Maybe I let ya beta test my tool when its done...
Rob
Still a great tool, just not for all rails....send me the ones you can't get straight and I'll take my time and make them right. Maybe I let ya beta test my tool when its done...
Rob
I don't agree with a straight sub-rail face, but a bowed feather-strip dado, because what you end up with is narrow and wide spots in the sub-rail when measured against the overall width of the nose of the cushion to the finish of the rails. Meaning that if the center of the rail is bowed out, away from the playing surface, and you make the sub-rail dead straight, the distance from the nose of the cushion to the finish of the rail at the center diamond is going to be greater than the width of the sub-rail from the nose of the cushion to the finish of the rail on the ends of the rails. I can correct the bow of the rails doing it my way, but you can't doing it your wayYour way also misses the indexing of the thickness of the sub-rails which is one of the most key important index points of a rail in order to determine the bevel needed to set the nose height to the correct height.
The correct formula is A x B= C being sub-rail bevel
Glen
I completely agree with what you are saying about the relationship of the constants determining bevel angle. It is the tooling repeatability that I think I can beat. I can also mount the tool you are using on the jig that I am using, that is the easy part.
Sounds like we need to each do a demo, I will find the worst set of GC rails and we can each do 3. Let the measurements fall where they may... Anyone wanna volunteer to referee?
Rob
Remember, zero doesn't exist but in theory. You can always divide a real number in 2.....
It will be real curious to see if a plywood fixture with wood screws can beat a precision milled aluminum fixture to do the same task. However it is like they say "Heavy is the head that wears the crown" and "Pride comes before the fall". We will just have to see which one wins in person. I have learned a lot from you, and I am on a better path because of it to continue onwards.
One question though...
What tool are you using to measure rail nose height? (no plastic or plywood tools please..)
Rob
You're young still, so I'll have to overlook your bet as being to easy, kind of like stealing candy from a babybut when I get back east I'll show you why it's so easy
Glen
Now you got me curious, I have 5 different measurement tools to get a nose height or subrail height. Below is the one I prefer...
View attachment 126013