Apparently not only me, but you too. Haven't you insisted your video links be taken off Dr. Dave's site because you were "wrong about what CTE is?"
Don't you realize how silly you (and other CTEers) look? That's it has been discussed over the last 15 years because that's how long it has taken for you and others to actually INVENT CTE; and you (or they) STILL haven't invented it yet; and that Stan is sweating bricks over this thread, because he knows the criticisms raised here will apply DIRECTLY to his DVD when (or if) it comes out?
CTE is a godawful MESS--of confusion and inaccuracy. People who have been deluded by it and who have deluded themselves are having a rather brutal little awakening over this thread.
No, I asked that my videos not be used as CTE references because I am not sure exactly that what I am dong is "proper" CTE. Would be no different if I put up some videos where I am demonstrating my understanding of Ghost Ball with the disclaimer that I am "learning".
The difference between you and I is that I am in communication with those who know what CTE is. I am student of it rather than a critic.
So let's say that I manage to get all the available information on Earth concerning CTE and I take it out as far as I can.
At that moment I can be the one who defines it's practicality and limitations. Until that moment I can't define it because I don't know it.
How can you define and constrain what you don't know?
You are taking limited input, that being incomplete instructions and coming to a conclusion.
Instead of saying, "based on what I do know, the system cannot work", you simply jump straight to "it cannot work".
For a guy who is supposedly rooted in science you delve a lot into predictive pyschology by assigning motivation and anxiety to people.
This thread is merely entertainment. You're just the newest member of the contrarian's club.
And really, that's ok because I have said many times in the past that CTE should be able to withstand scrutiny. If I could I would defy Hal's wishes and post up instructions, charts, videos, and whatever it took to get people to see his systems in action and be able to "get them" based on those remote instructions.
But I am not THAT into the subject matter as to do much more than be a cheerleader at this time. I don't have the deep involvement as Dave and Stan and Scott and Randy have. Don't have the equipment nor the time to treat it properly.
Which is why my involvement is limited to discussion where I simply stand up to be counted as someone who can testify to getting a better game thanks to Hal Houle AND putting up a few videos where I show the progress of my studies in this area.
I seriously doubt that anyone who truly knows CTE or is very close has had any kind of "brutal awakening" as to it's invalidity. I guess you missed the part where Fred Agnir pointed out that there is NOTHING new in this thread that hasn't been said a 1000 times before and that includes your charts. Those of us who USE CTE and similar systems to aim successfully are very happy with what it does for our game and we just laugh at you because we think you desperately want to know the "secret sauce" that makes CTE tick but you can not bring yourself to simply ask for it nicely.
And now it's too late, you have sown the seeds of discord and must reap the harvest of ignorance. As I told you, better to start over with a new identity and cozy up to those who know. Then MAYBE you have a chance to get the missing piece of the puzzle.
