One pocket poll.

The best game for a serious player!

  • yes

    Votes: 79 66.4%
  • No

    Votes: 40 33.6%

  • Total voters
    119
boring

I just don't enjoy one pocket...14.1 is much more enjoyable in my opinion....but I like to shoot balls and make balls...not just keep moving them around back and forth...yada yada... I feel one pocket takes you out of stroke.

How about a game of chess? I like that game much more than one pocket!
 
I just don't enjoy one pocket...14.1 is much more enjoyable in my opinion....but I like to shoot balls and make balls...not just keep moving them around back and forth...yada yada... I feel one pocket takes you out of stroke.

How about a game of chess? I like that game much more than one pocket!

That's the "C player snobs" that Anthony (OP) was talking about in a subsequent post. I guarantee you if you're in a match with a good one pocket player, the first mistake you make won't result in your opponent "merely" pushing balls back and forth, but rather in his/her pocket and running out on you.

I agree that excessive moving is boring, especially when there's a reasonably make-able shot that also offers position.

-Sean
 
Imply

That's the "C player snobs" that Anthony (OP) was talking about in a subsequent post. I guarantee you if you're in a match with a good one pocket player, the first mistake you make won't result in your opponent "merely" pushing balls back and forth, but rather in his/her pocket and running out on you.

I agree that excessive moving is boring, especially when there's a reasonably make-able shot that also offers position.

-Sean

If you're implying that I'm a C player because I don't like the game of one pocket you are sadly mistaken. If you're ever in Roanoke VA hit me up and we can put it on the table.
 
If you're implying that I'm a C player because I don't like the game of one pocket you are sadly mistaken. If you're ever in Roanoke VA hit me up and we can put it on the table.

Boy, we're reading into things, aren't we? I offered you an explanation that actually explains *WHY* you may be seeing what you're seeing (remember, we were on the topic of watching two players push balls back and forth), and you somehow read that as a challenge? <tisk> <tisk>

-Sean
 
apologies

Boy, we're reading into things, aren't we? I offered you an explanation that actually explains *WHY* you may be seeing what you're seeing (remember, we were on the topic of watching two players push balls back and forth), and you somehow read that as a challenge? <tisk> <tisk>

-Sean

I apologize. I just play with a lot of guys who are very good pool players who love the game of one pocket and it's always said that this game makes you "better". So I play with them and I lose. We switch back to 9 ball, 10ball, 8ball, and my winning percentage goes way up. So I guess I am still on the fence about whether or not this game will improve you as a player. I'm still just as good as these guys and better on my day ...they play a lot of one pocket, I do not. I'm still on their level in pool so how does their argument make sense?
 
I apologize. I just play with a lot of guys who are very good pool players who love the game of one pocket and it's always said that this game makes you "better". So I play with them and I lose. We switch back to 9 ball, 10ball, 8ball, and my winning percentage goes way up. So I guess I am still on the fence about whether or not this game will improve you as a player. I'm still just as good as these guys and better on my day ...they play a lot of one pocket, I do not. I'm still on their level in pool so how does their argument make sense?

Actually, your stance makes a lot of sense, and substantiates what was said (by the OP and others) in this thread. That is, if you play too much of any one game, you *can* become stunted in your growth as a player. Your success at playing these "one pocket snobs" in other games proves this out. You're a more well-rounded player.

I think what the OP was trying to ask, is "what game that, if you play it in moderation and in balance with your other games, will offer the most widespread-useful benefits to other games (i.e. precise cue ball control, uncanny banks, etc.)?" That would be one pocket, and/or 14.1. But, like anything, play too much of it, and you'll become so focused on those benefits, that you'll "forget" how to play the other games well/competitively.

Even 14.1 players that play only (exclusively) 14.1, prove this out -- they're often easily beatable at the rotation games, because they're not used to moving the cue ball large distances (or other skills needed for a good rotation game).

-Sean
 
thanks...makes sense

Actually, your stance makes a lot of sense, and substantiates what was said (by the OP and others) in this thread. That is, if you play too much of any one game, you *can* become stunted in your growth as a player. Your success at playing these "one pocket snobs" in other games proves this out. You're a more well-rounded player.

I think what the OP was trying to ask, is "what game that, if you play it in moderation and in balance with your other games, will offer the most widespread-useful benefits to other games (i.e. precise cue ball control, uncanny banks, etc.)?" That would be one pocket, and/or 14.1. But, like anything, play too much of it, and you'll become so focused on those benefits, that you'll "forget" how to play the other games well/competitively.

Even 14.1 players that play only (exclusively) 14.1, prove this out -- they're often easily beatable at the rotation games, because they're not used to moving the cue ball large distances (or other skills needed for a good rotation game).

-Sean

That makes sense. I guess I never thought of it in this way. Every time they ask me to play this game I always just ask "why"? I know I'm not going to take the time to learn the game the way I would need to in order to compete so I spend my time playing the games I enjoy and feel I need to keep working on. I suppose if I was going to gamble I would need to get a good handle on this game. Thanks for your thoughts.
 
14.1 for me. One Pocket I'd probably place second. I think One Pocket covers a wider variety of shots overall, but I think 14.1 demands much more.
 
Back
Top