Yea it works ok on thick and thin shots, i agreeNeil are you sure its not the user that works really well?
Positive. I have proven it to a number of people.
Yea it works ok on thick and thin shots, i agreeNeil are you sure its not the user that works really well?
It relies on feet position AND on the shadows, I know, I did purchase the system.
I have spent many hours learning from Ron. We have worked on kicking, banking, and of course the system that most are calling 90-90.
If the balls are more than two diamonds apart you can 90-90 regardless of the thickness or thiness of the shot.
When the balls are closer than two diamonds you have to adjust. Ron teaches these adjustments. I have looked at cte and the see system. There are many who have learned these systems, and they have had success with them. I believe what Ron teaches is easier to learn and easier to use, for me.
If some of you do not agree that is ok. Use whatever system that works for you.
It is like using a very heavy cue or a super light one. There is no one size fits all. Use what you feel comfortable with.
I never said the system cant work. I am willing to bet you and Neil do not use it. Its kinda neat at first glance but the deeper you get into it, the more you start scratching your head.
From what i hear he is great instructor, one of the best out there and he could teach me a ton of stuff, 100%. I would pass on the 90/90 stuff though from what i have experienced and i truly do understand these alignment/aiming systems and how each one works.
90/90 is basically only helpful for an almost straight in shot, after that the the system keeps getting weaker and weaker until a very thin cut. Your pretty much on your own between a thick and thin cut. Ron V has to upgrade the system. 90/90 if upgraded will turn into the half ball pivot system, its already out here. I have tried both.
The see system is a better system and it is a cte system despite what anyone says...my opinion. It also is a one line system. The key to this system is the positioning of the feet. Now for a right handed player the right foot is the base and you use left foot to position your body in the correct alignment. You must feel where to position the left foot and pointing it at the pocket gets you close. I have not purchased the system but i have figured it out by watching ecks youtube videos. This is actually a good system and i tried it on a few shots and it works. It relies on the feet and not the shadows for it to work.
Yea it works ok on thick and thin shots, i agreeNeil are you sure its not the user that works really well?
Well, you sure aren't understanding 90/90 properly. For what it's worth, I like CTE, and several other systems. I do use 90/90 exclusively now. It's so much easier. I not only use it, but I have added a few things to it that truly are part of the 90/90 way of aiming. Ron did real good with this aiming method!
Like i said in the past post above, "are you sure its not the user that works really well?" You had to add a few things to it to use it. I said he has to upgrade it in another past post in this thread, you really think i dont understand itI am only talking about the system and not attacking Ron V and like i said, i have heard nothing but great things about him.
i can shoot the systemThis is why i am telling you whats wrong with it, I can shoot 90/90 with or with out a pivot to center also. Between a thick and thin shot your basically using feel/ghost ball or contact point to make the shot. You think going edge to edge,edge to center,etc with a half ball pivot to center magically gets you on the shot? The system is giving you a repeated very basic starting point for every shot and then saying now you go find it. Now at the ete point and the pivot you have to find the contact point, not so hard for thick cuts but it gets harder and harder moving to half ball.
Now if you don't understand the bold above, you don't understand aiming/alignment systems and how 90/90 works.
why would you be using 90/90 because according to you, you understand cte/pro1 and how to apply it...hmmmm? That should not happen! its like purposely going from a ferrari to a basic compact car by your choice with 20 million in the bank.
Sean i just read and post off the top of my head and no concern of run-on sentences were appropriately chopped-up into separate sentences, and structure / punctuation. lol![]()
You would have to Pay Up Sucker. I use it all the time.
i can shoot the systemThis is why i am telling you whats wrong with it, I can shoot 90/90 with or with out a pivot to center also. Between a thick and thin shot your basically using feel/ghost ball or contact point to make the shot. You think going edge to edge,edge to center,etc with a half ball pivot to center magically gets you on the shot? The system is giving you a repeated very basic starting point for every shot and then saying now you go find it. Now at the ete point and the pivot you have to find the contact point, not so hard for thick cuts but it gets harder and harder moving to half ball.
Now if you don't understand the bold above, you don't understand aiming/alignment systems and how 90/90 works.
why would you be using 90/90 because according to you, you understand cte/pro1 and how to apply it...hmmmm? That should not happen! its like purposely going from a ferrari to a basic compact car by your choice with 20 million in the bank.
Why would I prefer 90/90 over CTE? Simply because it's simpler to use. That's all. Now, with your above statements, I find it rather odd that just now, I broke the balls and then proceeded to make the 7 remaining balls by doing nothing more than looking at both the cb and ob to find ETE, and, once I found that, I shifted my focus to the cb only, pivoted, and shot without ever looking at the ob. Yet, somehow, all 7 found their way to the correct pocket.
I don't normally shoot that way, but I did it this time to prove a point. It doesn't work for you, fine. That doesn't mean it doesn't work as advertised. Same as when you used to argue CTE with others that said it couldn't work.