CTE and TOI

Status
Not open for further replies.
True, but as I said this guy is also a fine player. It makes me wonder how -- if a guy with his education and skills in analyzing things can't successfully deploy this system -- what chance does the guy with the GED got.

Lou Figueroa


How did he not get you ask? I'm sure it was because of his friend constantly reminding him of how the information can't help him. That friend being the (nb92's thought #2 on page 5) of thread CTE AND TOI. :)
 
Lou,

CTE PRO ONE is not about language and math skills involved in obtaining a GED. I would never say in a million years that one needs a GED to learn CTE PRO ONE, VIDEO wise or n person.

I am betting there are plenty of folks in the ST LOUIS area without
a GED that can eat your attorney friend up visually and physically.

This is not about doctors and lawyers. This is about a very special set of instructions for an optimal visual and physical approach to connecting with the geometry of a table. I have learned a language that can convey this for the very first time. Is it perfect? No....but I am getting close to perfect as will be seen in DVD2.

CTE PRO ONE instruction focuses on a VISUAL and PHYSICAL education for pool.

From what I have seen, it boils down to MOTIVATION.

I wanted this for myself, an understanding of CTE, and it boiled down to desire and resolve. I basically started with "see CTE and shoot." That was 8 years and 15/000 hours of work ago.

So, I pack 10,000 hours of instruction into video DVD1 concerning how to shorten the journey into just weeks. Some want to watch a video 1 or 2 or 3 times and do just do just a little work at the table and they are done? No wonder.

I just received a note from a young man who is motivated and hung in there with his study for a couple of hundred hours.
He just proudly proclaimed that the video was the best pool money he'd ever spent in 22 years. He stuck with it because he wanted it and had faith in my work. Now he has something so special that's it's in a completely different dimension from what you know and understand. And that is a shame, too, because as much as you love this game you are on a journey of never connecting with the most amazing geometric discovery ever in our game.
Your attorney friend, sounds like he will miss out as well.

Put me in contact with your fine playing attorney friend and I will give him a demo at my home this spring.

Stan Shuffett


I will be sure to pass your offer along the next time I see him.

Lou Figueroa
 
There is no question that many players have had great success with CTE. Are they all smarter than an attorney? I think one's general intelligence has little to do with it. Everyone has the capacity to learn CTE.

For a comparison, how do you attain a clean consistent stroke? Do you read a book? Take professional instruction? Both of these will help accelerate the process, but there is absolutely no substitution for practice and persistance until the stroke feels natural. It can take months to years.

You can apply the same analogy to CTE. It is very different than traditional aiming methods. At first it will seem awkward. But through practice and persistence, it will come.

This has been my experience with CTE. I consider myself a pretty smart guy. I was a double major computer science and math, and minor in music. I do application development for a career, and I played lead trumpet in a jazz ensemble at the college level. So did I watch the DVD and "get it"? Absolutely not. It was confusing and full of unanswered questions. However the underlying principle really intrigued me, and I decided to pursue it. So on pretty much blind faith, I took the DVD to the table, watched a shot, then stopped the video and attempted the shot myself. Although the procedure was quite alien to me, I was able to pocket balls pretty quickly. So I just kept going. Slowly but surely things started to feel more natural, and ball pocketing became easier. At about the eight month mark, things really fell into place and this is when I started feeling comfortable with the system. Every day I get a little further. Can it be learned faster? I'm sure it can, and it all hinges on the amount of time you have to practice. I only had a day a week.

As things came together, many things said and demonstrated on the video began to fill in the blanks. I would watch the video again and again, slowly assembling the system and making it work. I can't tell you how many emails were sent to Stan, but he answered all of them, usually within the same day.

So IMHO whether you are a rocket scientist or a GED has little to do with any of it. It is willingness to learn and persistence that will bring it all together.


I think you can learn something and come to the realization that it is a flawed model. So you discard it.

Lou Figueroa
 
It's one thing to not like the system, or to say you don't want to use it. But you'd have to be pretty dumb to at least not understand it after watching the DVD.


You can watch the DVD, understand it, and realize it doesn't work as advertised. Just because something comes out on a DVD (or is on TV, or in the newspaper) does not mean that it is valid.

Lou Figueroa
 
I second all of this - computer/math guy here too (no minor in music but played piano for 9 years). Same experience with the DVD, in person lessons would have been great but as mentioned before Stan was very gracious with his time with those of us that reached out to him.

I've shown a few people now the various systems out there and without exception their improvement is instantaneous. Now of course beyond that initial success requires putting the time in to really understand all of the nuances, gain confidence, incorporate it into your PSR, etc. But it still shortcuts the normal HAMB approach. Either can work, just depends on your individual perception at the table.

Much like my old pool partner (a very good player) - he has clearly seen me demonstrate improvements gained by using the system, but just can't wrap his head around why he would need to pivot or perceive anything other than ghost ball. So it may not be for everyone - your attorney friend included - and if you feel everything is fine the way you do things then that's great. But that doesn't mean it's not a valid, and possibly enhanced, approach to the game.

Scott


I think some people benefit from all kinds of things that aren't "valid," much like a placebo effect. I believe Dr. Dave also has a list on his site of why some people might benefit from CTE.

Lou Figueroa
 
How did he not get you ask? I'm sure it was because of his friend constantly reminding him of how the information can't help him. That friend being the (nb92's thought #2 on page 5) of thread CTE AND TOI. :)


He was aware, long before he got the DVD, what I thought of it. But he's a smart guy and was able to make up his own mind after studying it ;-)

Lou Figueroa
 
Stan, I came to your house a couple of years ago to take a CTE lesson. It was a few months prior to your DVD being released. At that time, your documentation/diagrams were rudimentary as best.

While you are clearly a great guy, and I believe a knowledgeable and skilled instructor, I simply didn't get it at all. I just chalked it up to me not being a high level player and was done with it. I tried working with it for awhile on my table at home but as I said, the documentation was very minimal so I just let it go. I also really didn't like all the pivoting, it seemed somewhat counter intuitive to my SPF training.

Perhaps some people see the lines/angles you tried to show me. Honestly, I couldn't see them at all. To be fair, I recently purchased the SEE stuff and found the same thing to be true, i.e., it just didn't work for me.

Perhaps it is a left brain vs right brain sort of thing, I don't know. I'm thinking about buying your DVD and giving it another try. Obviously, a lot of people are fanboys so I'm believing it can work if grasped properly. I presently employ the SAM aiming system along with feel.

I congratulate you for your hard work, enthusiasm and commitment. Whether its something that ever works for me or helps my game is irrelevant. The game of pool needs more fine people like yourself contributing towards its advancement. Keep up the good work Stan!
 
Lou,

In reading your posts I assume you must think you are quite knowledgable about CTE PRO ONE.

You discuss CTE and I guess PRO ONE as being a flawed model and you purport these systems to have no validity.

Well, my first thought is, true knowledge comes from experience.
My knowledge that I have developed for CTE spans 6-8 years and over thousands of hours of study at the table. I have also taken CTE PRO ONE to competition and have fared quite well.

I KNOW you have little experience with CTE PRO ONE. There's not one person on this forum that would bet $1000 that you have played one rack of 14.1 or one rack of one-pocket with CTE PRO ONE.

You see, YOUR argument is flawed and of extremely poor MODEL because you speak without true knowledge that comes from experience. Your experience is limited. Yeah, you have read post for 15 years but it's a sure bet you have less than a few hours in study on the table visually and physically with CTE.

What you are good at is spinning words and you'll spin this but all you're doing is spinning yourself into a deeper hole.

Lou,you could accept JB's offer and come to my home and gladly work in good faith on really developing some true knowledge about CTE. To be honest, it's hard for me to this, but I am not at the point yet to where I would decline. It would depend a lot on your attitude and if you are willing to empty the cup.


Stan Shuffett
 
Last edited:
Stan, I came to your house a couple of years ago to take a CTE lesson. It was a few months prior to your DVD being released. At that time, your documentation/diagrams were rudimentary as best.

While you are clearly a great guy, and I believe a knowledgeable and skilled instructor, I simply didn't get it at all. I just chalked it up to me not being a high level player and was done with it. I tried working with it for awhile on my table at home but as I said, the documentation was very minimal so I just let it go. I also really didn't like all the pivoting, it seemed somewhat counter intuitive to my SPF training.

Perhaps some people see the lines/angles you tried to show me. Honestly, I couldn't see them at all. To be fair, I recently purchased the SEE stuff and found the same thing to be true, i.e., it just didn't work for me.

Perhaps it is a left brain vs right brain sort of thing, I don't know. I'm thinking about buying your DVD and giving it another try. Obviously, a lot of people are fanboys so I'm believing it can work if grasped properly. I presently employ the SAM aiming system along with feel.

I congratulate you for your hard work, enthusiasm and commitment. Whether its something that ever works for me or helps my game is irrelevant. The game of pool needs more fine people like yourself contributing towards its advancement. Keep up the good work Stan!

Thanks for your nice post. I am happy to schedule a follow-up for you for a coca-cola. Call me for details.
I will be glad to assist you with your concerns.
Stan Shuffett
 
Thanks for your nice post. I am happy to schedule a follow-up for you for a coca-cola. Call me for details.
I will be glad to assist you with your concerns.
Stan Shuffett

Stan, I just ordered your DVD. I may want to take another lesson at your house after I've worked with it a bit. However, if I do, I also will expect to pay your going rate. We'll have to agree to that up front. I respect the work you've done, you deserve to get compensated for it whether my engineer left brain can grasp it or not. :D
 
Stan, I just ordered your DVD. I may want to take another lesson at your house after I've worked with it a bit. However, if I do, I also will expect to pay your going rate. We'll have to agree to that up front. I respect the work you've done, you deserve to get compensated for it whether my engineer left brain can grasp it or not. :D

Yes, :) THX, A coca-cola zero it is.

Study your DVD. And let's get together as i want to see you understand CTE PRO ONE as well as be able to apply it in your game.

Many thanks for the order!

Stan Shuffett
 
I personally would like to hear of one gap or flaw that cte/pro1 has. I keep hearing about that from the same people but no one has actually said what they are? By the way, someone’s inability to learn the system is not a system flaw but a user flaw. In addition, someone’s inability to figure what alignment to shoot is not a system flaw but a user flaw.

Now I will call out dr dave, Lou f, lou f’s attorney friend, Pj, scott lee, etc and please post a gap or flaw in the system? and not a user flaw.

added; Now just because you may know the alignments/pivots on paper that does not mean you know the system. Your knowledge ends on that piece of paper.
 
Last edited:
You can watch the DVD, understand it, and realize it doesn't work as advertised. Just because something comes out on a DVD (or is on TV, or in the newspaper) does not mean that it is valid.

Lou Figueroa

How did it not work as advertised?

I can make pretty much every shot demonstrated on the DVD using Pro One. The only ones I haven't practiced are the jump shots because I don't have a jump cue. Like I said, it's cool if you don't like it and want to use something else instead. I just have a problem with people that dismiss it before putting in the hours it takes to get the system down.

I play about 1 or 2 times a week, and have been working on it for the past month. I'm still only about 85% proficient with the system. It just takes time and dedication. Like anything else in this sport.
 
I'm relatively new to this discussion but I'll offer up an analogy. Tiger Woods has revamped his game several times & he is aware that it takes time to truely improve & that his game will regress in the short term until the time has been put in to recieve the benefits that are forth coming.

Perhaps, & I certainly can not & do not purport to speak for Mr. Lou, but perhaps he did not see any initial benefit over what he is using & is not willing to have his game regress for what he feels might not be an actual benefit for him.

I am going through a similiar thing with TOI. I am intrigued by CTE and will eventually get around to pursue giving it a fair try.

Mr. Lou is not enamered with CTE to the extent as others but is entitled to express his opinion. It does not seem to me he is telling anyone to not try it. He is just expressing his disappointment with it. The adult AZB readership are not babies in need of baby sitting & will make up their own minds as to whether to give his opinion more or less weight compared to those that are enamered with CTE. One size does not fit all. If one is in search of help they are more willing to have an open mind regarding 'help'. The readership will be the determining factor as to the success of CTE where AZB is concerned.

Just my $0.02.
 
Last edited:
Lou,

In reading your posts I assume you must think you are quite knowledgable about CTE PRO ONE.

You discuss CTE and I guess PRO ONE as being a flawed model and you purport these systems to have no validity.

Well, my first thought is, true knowledge comes from experience.
My knowledge that I have developed for CTE spans 6-8 years and over thousands of hours of study at the table. I have also taken CTE PRO ONE to competition and have fared quite well.

I KNOW you have little experience with CTE PRO ONE. There's not one person on this forum that would bet $1000 that you have played one rack of 14.1 or one rack of one-pocket with CTE PRO ONE.

You see, YOUR argument is flawed and of extremely poor MODEL because you speak without true knowledge that comes from experience. Your experience is limited. Yeah, you have read post for 15 years but it's a sure bet you have less than a few hours in study on the table visually and physically with CTE.

What you are good at is spinning words and you'll spin this but all you're doing is spinning yourself into a deeper hole.

Lou,you could accept JB's offer and come to my home and gladly work in good faith on really developing some true knowledge about CTE. To be honest, it's hard for me to this, but I am not at the point yet to where I would decline. It would depend a lot on your attitude and if you are willing to empty the cup.


Stan Shuffett


Well, they/you would lose that $1K bet because after watching your DVD I did try *many* racks of 14.1 and couldn't begin to make it work.

As I said in my first post in this thread, it would be beneficial to the discussion if the proponents would just acknowledge that this system is not for everyone. But apparently that is too much to ask -- you would prefer to place the blame for failure on the individual rather than the system.

And here's some free PR advice: you should get off the repeated proffers to teach people at your home in the manner that you are offering it because the message it sends is that the DVD does not stand alone and that after folks purchases it they will, almost inevitably, need further instruction that may or may not make it work. You're welcome.

Lou Figueroa
 
Last edited:
I'm relatively new to this discussion but I'll offer up an analogy. Tiger Woods has revamped his game several times & he is aware that it takes time to truely improve & that his game will regress in the short term until the time has been put in to recieve the benefits that are forth coming.

Perhaps, & I certainly can not & do not purport to speak for Mr. Lou, but perhaps he did not see any initial benefit over what he is using & is not willing to have his game regress for what he feels might not be an actual benefit for him.

I am going through a similiar thing with TOI. I am intrigued by CTE and will eventually get around to pursue giving it a fair try.

Mr. Lou is not enamered with CTE to the extent as others but is entitled to express his opinion. It does not seem to me he is telling anyone to not try it. He is just expressing his disappointment with it. The adult AZB readership are not babies in need of baby sitting & will make up their own minds as to whether to give his opinion more or less weight compared to those that are enamered with CTE. One size does not fit all. If one is in search of help they are more willing to have an open mind regarding 'help'. The readership will be the determining factor as to the success of CTE where AZB is concerned.

Just my $0.02.


Exactly and thanks, ENGLISH!.

Lou Figueroa
 
Well, they/you would lose that $1K bet because after watching your DVD I did try *many* racks of 14.1 and couldn't begin to make it work.

As I said in my first post in this thread, it would be beneficial to the discussion if the proponents would just acknowledge that this system is not for everyone. But apparently that is too much to ask -- you would prefer to place the blame for failure on the individual rather than the system.

And here's some free PR advice: you should get off the repeated proffers to teach people at your home in the manner that you are offering it because the message it sends is that the DVD does not stand alone and that after folks purchases it they will, almost inevitably, need further instruction that may or may not make it work. You're welcome.

Lou Figueroa

There are different types of people on this site and in life Lou. Some are quick learners and some are not. Some people are also lazy in there efforts to learn things on there own. Stan has made himself available to all free of charge. Is this hate ever going to end with you Lou? I am beginning to think you may have a disruptive behavior disorder?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top