Do you use an aiming system or go by feel?

Do you use an aiming system or go by feel?

  • I always go by feel

    Votes: 153 53.5%
  • Usually by feel, with aiming systems for hard shots

    Votes: 68 23.8%
  • Usually with aiming systems, by feel for easy shots

    Votes: 24 8.4%
  • I always use aiming systems

    Votes: 26 9.1%
  • I just hit balls very hard and hope they sink

    Votes: 15 5.2%

  • Total voters
    286
They like to explain the makes with subconscious adjustment but refuse to give the subconscious credit for the misses.
That's you arguing with yourself again. I don't recall anybody but you suggesting the subconscious is infallible. Feel players miss all the time, just like you.

Apparently only CTE can tap into it to trigger the subconscious into a higher state of accuracy......
Maybe it's the only thing that can trigger it for you... others don't necessarily share your limitations.

pj
chgo
 
That's sort of what I thought & expected. Nothing of any substance relating to any 'system'.

Why come on a discussion forum, if you do not wish to honestly discuss what you are putting out?

Ulterior motives?

Best Wishes.

CTE is a powerful objective visual system and it can be learned. PERIOD.

The crusade to stop CTE actually aids in propelling it forward.

Stan Shuffett
 
CTE is a powerful objective visual system and it can be learned. PERIOD.

The crusade to stop CTE actually aids in propelling it forward.

Stan Shuffett

I added a PS to my last post.

I'm NOT trying to stop anyone from trying whatever they wish in an effort to play better. They should just do so knowing full well what it is that they will be buying & trying.

Your first statement here (that put in blue) is merely your opinion. It is one that logical, rational, critical thinking along with some rather simple science would indicate to be incorrect. MIC DROP. SLAM DUNK. TAKE IT TO THE BANK.
 
Same old same old from that certain few.
Duckie/Greg's post of last night seems even more applicable by dawn's early light.
You just can't use logic with illogical individuals & expect them to see the truth of matters.
PS Especially when they are acting like children. I guess I should not say that.
Most children act better than illogical adults that are acting like children.
Pot...meet Kettle
 
I added a PS to my last post.

I'm NOT trying to stop anyone from trying whatever they wish in an effort to play better. They should just do so knowing full well what it is that they will be buying & trying.

Your first statement here (that put in blue) is merely your opinion. It is one that logical, rational, critical thinking along with some rather simple science would indicate to be incorrect. MIC DROP. SLAM DUNK. TAKE IT TO THE BANK.

Sorry, you can not get CTE.....better said would be...YOU do not want to get CTE.

And I do not care one bit whether you get CTE or not....Every year more and more players get CTE and nothing that you will ever say or do can stop the growth of CTE from happening around the world.

Stan Shuffett
 
Still waiting for that proof you've never given. :thumbup:

I am not concerned about proof in any kind of way. CTE is a visual system and I seriously doubt that any real math will ever emerge that can really explain the perceptual phenomenon of CTE.

Stan Shuffett
 
Sorry, you can not get CTE.....better said would be...YOU do not want to get CTE.

And I do not care one bit whether you get CTE or not....Every year more and more players get CTE and nothing that you will ever say or do can stop the growth of CTE from happening around the world.

Stan Shuffett

With all due respect.

Do you have a reading comprehension problem or is it just subconsciously over ridden by your self thought omniscience?

Or did you not read my PS or have you not seen the many statements I've made regarding individuals buying & trying CTE.

Perhaps your past experience here with what you call 'haters' has given you an inferiority complex, made you paranoid or something similar.

Best Wishes.
 
Last edited:
I am not concerned about proof in any kind of way. CTE is a visual system and I seriously doubt that any real math will ever emerge that can really explain the perceptual phenomenon of CTE.
Stan Shuffett
And after leading with a left hook bluff, Stan delivers an exquisite spinning back kick to the head of B and B goes through the ropes in a coma. :wink:
 
I seriously doubt that any real math will ever emerge that can really explain the perceptual phenomenon of CTE.
"The real math" didn't have to "emerge"; it has existed since long before any of us were born - this ain't rocket surgery.

It shows that "the perceptual phenomenon of CTE" is feel.

pj <- not that there's anything wrong with that
chgo
 
With all do respect.

Do you have a reading comprehension problem or is it just subconsciously over ridden by your self thought omniscience?

Or did you not read my PS or have you not seen the many statements I've made regarding individuals buying & trying CTE.

Perhaps your past experience here with what you call
'haters' has given you an inferiority complex or something similar.

Best Wishes.

You have likely spent your entire playing days with your visual focus directly behind CCB.

And your debating position on the subject is from that perspective also. I know CTE from just beside CCB, That is a completely different visual world that you have never known or likely ever will know.

I do not care if you do not ever visit the visual world of where the game really resides.

You can stay stuck behind CCB.

Stan Shuffett
 
I am not concerned about proof in any kind of way. CTE is a visual system and I seriously doubt that any real math will ever emerge that can really explain the perceptual phenomenon of CTE.

Stan Shuffett

Again, with all due respect,

There is more than 'math' that is capable of 'proving' things that are of an abstract nature such as objectivity & subjectivity.

If you are 'not concerned about proof in ANY kind of way', then you nor your defenders should NEVER ask for proof regarding anything what anyone else says about CTE.

Best Wishes.
 
"The real math" didn't have to "emerge"; it has existed since long before any of us were born - this ain't rocket surgery.

It shows that "the perceptual phenomenon of CTE" is feel.

pj <- not that there's anything wrong with that
chgo

You, too, are not familiar with the visual realm of pool that is available from just beside CCB. I have been and am still introducing to the whole world a brand new look that makes a huge difference in learning how to play the game the real way.

Visit the real way to aim, just beside CCB. You might like it!

Stan Shuffett
 
Again, with all due respect,

There is more than 'math' that is capable of 'proving' things that are of an abstract nature such as objectivity & subjectivity.

If you are 'not concerned about proof in ANY kind of way', then you nor your defenders should NEVER ask for proof regarding anything what anyone else says about CTE.

Best Wishes.

Proof......you would let proof keep you away from playing the game the way it is really meant to be played.

Take a visit to just beside CCB! Visit the world of the pros.

Stan Shuffett
 
You have likely spent your entire playing days with your visual focus directly behind CCB.

And your debating position on the subject is from that perspective also. I know CTE from just beside CCB, That is a completely different visual world that you have never known or likely ever will know.

I do not care if you do not ever visit the visual world of where the game really resides.

You can stay stuck behind CCB.

Stan Shuffett

At least this time you used the word 'likely'.

You're completely wrong though. MY perspective has almost 'always' been offset from the center of the cue ball on the equal overlap side & I have played with what 'most' (not PJ) would consider to be parallel english for nearly quite all of my playing time.

I have only recently gone more to a perspective of behind center CB since using TOI & also playing one pocket & hitting more shots on center.

It's this kind of arrogance & thinking that one is omniscient to make personal 'attacks' that has caused much of the useless posts in these 'discussions'.

Best Wishes.
 
Proof......you would let proof keep you away from playing the game the way it is really meant to be played.

Take a visit to just beside CCB! Visit the world of the pros.

Stan Shuffett

We're cross posting. Please see my earlier post.

It appears as though you are now on a new 'advertising' campaign.

Have you ever considered that your 'vision' & cue placement is different than others & have you ever heard of Einstein's theory of Relativity, not the actual theory, but how it is sometimes 'explained'?

Best Wishes.
 
Last edited:
At least this time you used the word 'likely'.

You're completely wrong though. MY perspective has almost 'always' been offset from the center of the cue ball on the equal overlap side & I have played with 'most' (not PJ) would consider to be parallel english for nearly quite all of my playing time.

I have only recently gone more to a perspective of behind center since using TOI & also playing one pocket & hitting more shots on center.

It's this kind of arrogance & thinking that one is omniscient to make personal 'attacks' that has caused much of the useless posts in these 'discussions'.

Best Wishes.

Deliver all the blows that you can! You have ZERO chance of stopping the CTE phenomenon from spreading and spreading and spreading around the world. And when my book is released your ZERO chance is going to go to the negative side.
You are looking at a complete impossibility.

Thank you for allowing me this opportunity to advance CTE.....

Stan Shuffett
 
"The real math" didn't have to "emerge"; it has existed since long before any of us were born - this ain't rocket surgery.

It shows that "the perceptual phenomenon of CTE" is feel.

pj <- not that there's anything wrong with that
chgo
I agree.
There's nothing wrong with feel either, its really the big part of every shot.
Well... unless your a robot.
 
I agree.
There's nothing wrong with feel either, its really the big part of every shot.
Well... unless your a robot.

Perhaps with CTE, I can find feel via objectivity or objectivity via feel. That'd be pretty special wouldn't it? Perhaps at cte's highest level there is a merging of the two.

Stan Shuffett
 
Last edited:
Back
Top