Seriously you are the biggest idiot on this forum (and that is saying a lot!) if you truly believe Shane is a betting favorite in any race against any player in the world.
Keep going off of your "opinion" instead of actual results like how he can't seem to beat Ko regardless of the race.
I think that it depends on the circumstances.
In a long race to 100 Shane should be the betting favorite against anyone. In a shorter race it gets closer to even. Also conditions and rules used play a part.
I think Shane wins against Ko in a long race in the TAR format.
The 9 BALL WPC was Ko getting the best of the rolls and nothing else.
Vegas was Shane flat out dogging it at the end.
I think to see how the professional bookmakers in England see it we should look at what they had for the SVB/KO finals at the WPC.
As for this match, Karen has proven time and again that she is a top player to be reckoned with. Will she win the US Open? Probably not but she can win the US Open.
She is one great player among a lot of great players. What this result shows is that Karen is fully capable of hanging with the best in the world (many of knew that) but it certainly doesn't mean she is the best in the world obviously.
We can still celebrate this victory just as we would celebrate any "underdog" who manages to take a set off a champion.
As for Ko......all he has to do is find backers willing to put up $20,000+ to play Shane a race to 100 TAR format. Shane's money is always ready to do that against ANY player on the planet no matter who they are.
Surely someone in Taiwan can make that happen?