SVB vs. Chinakov updates

I'm not a golfer. But I bet if you want to use a driver on every hole you have that option. May not make sense, but the option is there.

Out of the 18 holes played in a round of golf how many hole do you think the pro's don't use a driver. Maybe 3 or 4.

In Shane' case he was never allowed to use his 'driver'.

Maybe a fairer way to have played the match would have been to break one game from inside the box and one from outside the box until a winner was decided.

Don

Pretty funny stuff, Don. Maybe you should speak about things you know. In a typical round of golf, on an open course, the pro will use his driver on all holes except par 3s. That's roughly 13-14 holes. But, certain courses on the tour have been cut thin at the bomber's ranges, so the pro is forced to use a 3 wood, or hybrid, if he wants a decent shot into the green. Tiger had to use a 3 wood for entire rounds at specific courses. He didn't whine about it. Sure, he COULD tee off with a driver EVERY hole if he wanted to. I could drive to work on Monday with my arms crossed. Doesn't mean it's the best thing to do.

You never hear a pro golfer ***** about the course. He just changes his strategy, and approaches each hole the same way - "what's the best shot?". I don't think Shane ever thought "what.....I have to break from outside the box.....what the hell am I going to do??". The score was 15-15 at the break. Even. I think a bigger deal is being made about the table, the break, etc than it really contributed. The US Open had no break box rules, and was played on Diamond tables. No gafs. He lost there, too.

Sometimes, great players lose to other great players. What all of these excuses do is diminish the winner's victory. Ruslan won, Shane lost. Maybe next time, Shane will win. They're both incredibly talented. All yesterday was is one battle in a lifetime of wars between these guys. People beating Shane is good for the game. When Tiger was winning everything on the PGA, it started to get boring. The past year, there were 3 guys duking it out for the Fedex cup. Rivalries are good for pool. If you get a few "professional" rivalries with good play, and the players are gentlemen, ratings will go up. Trust me....yesterday was a good day for the game of pool. On all fronts.
 
Last edited:
Pretty funny stuff, Don. Maybe you should speak about things you know. In a typical round of golf, on an open course, the pro will use his driver on all holes except par 3s. That's roughly 13-14 holes. But, certain courses on the tour have been cut thin at the bomber's ranges, so the pro is forced to use a 3 wood, or hybrid, if he wants a decent shot into the green. Tiger had to use a 3 wood for entire rounds at specific courses. He didn't whine about it. Sure, he COULD tee off with a driver EVERY hole if he wanted to. I could drive to work on Monday with my arms crossed. Doesn't mean it's the best thing to do.

You never hear a pro golfer ***** about the course. He just changes his strategy, and approaches each hole the same way - "what's the best shot?". I don't think Shane ever thought "what.....I have to break from outside the box.....what the hell am I going to do??". The score was 15-15 at the break. Even. I think a bigger deal is being made about the table, the break, etc than it really contributed. The US Open had no break box rules, and was played on Diamond tables. No gafs. He lost there, too.

Sometimes, great players lose to other great players. What all of these excuses do is diminish the winner's victory. Ruslan won, Shane lost. Maybe next time, Shane will win. They're both incredibly talented. All yesterday was is one battle in a lifetime of wars between these guys. People beating Shane is good for the game. When Tiger was winning everything on the PGA, it started to get boring. The past year, there were 3 guys duking it out for the Fedex cup. Rivalries are good for pool. If you get a few "professional" rivalries with good play, and the players are gentlemen, ratings will go up. Trust me....yesterday was a good day for the game of pool. On all fronts.

But you have choices in all of the above. Shane had no choice. Sounds to me as though you're just talking out of your %$#.

Don
 
But you have choices in all of the above. Shane had no choice. Sounds to me as though you're just talking out of your %$#.

Don
You're right, Don. Ruslan played terrible. The only reason he won was because Shane couldn't break from the box. If he had been allowed to, he would have snapped off a 30 pack, and whitewashed the Russian.

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
 
You're right, Don. Ruslan played terrible. The only reason he won was because Shane couldn't break from the box. If he had been allowed to, he would have snapped off a 30 pack, and whitewashed the Russian.

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk

Don might as well say Shane's U.S. opens are not "real wins" since players weren't allowed to break from the side rail.
 
You're right, Don. Ruslan played terrible. The only reason he won was because Shane couldn't break from the box. If he had been allowed to, he would have snapped off a 30 pack, and whitewashed the Russian.

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk

Exactly. That guy from Russia is a joke. He can't play. He has no stroke - fundamentals, and he is a terrible shotmaker. He was only breaking well outside the box.

On the other hand, Shane has the best stroke - fundamentals, and he is the best shotmaker of all times. He just can't break well outside the box...... :thumbup:
 
Don might as well say Shane's U.S. opens are not "real wins" since players weren't allowed to break from the side rail.
He actually reminds me of Earl Strickland. Earl walked out on a match with Corey because of the soft break.

If you want to talk about a guy that had a right to complain about "break rules" but didn't, talk about Corey. They all but banned the soft break. Was there something in the rules of pool that said you had to hit any shot a certain speed for it to be legal?

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
 
It does appear that there are a few Shane bashers on here. I support great pool. Shane lost under the conditions that were agreed on or forced on the players.

But when you take away the strength of one player, have you really proven who is the better player.

"Mano a Mano" is the best way to determine who is best. Not saying that Shane would have won. But it was quite obvious that Ruslan was afraid of Shane's break.

Don
"Mano a Mano" doesn't actually mean "man to man". You may want to look that up....

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
 
"Mano a Mano" doesn't actually mean "man to man". You may want to look that up....

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk

I think you better look it up yourself.

Better yet i will do it for you.

Websters dictionary.

Definition of MANO A MANO

: in direct competition or conflict especially between two people.

Now you gals/guys can have this thread all to yourselves.

Don
 
I think you better look it up yourself.

Better yet i will do it for you.

Websters dictionary.

Definition of MANO A MANO

: in direct competition or conflict especially between two people.

Now you gals/guys can have this thread all to yourselves.

Don

It actually means "hand to hand". Go ask someone that actually speaks Spanish :)

Mano = hand.
 
I think you better look it up yourself.

Better yet i will do it for you.

Websters dictionary.

Definition of MANO A MANO

: in direct competition or conflict especially between two people.

And what exactly was yesterday's match if not "mano a mano"??? lol

Don, you're killing me here!!!:rotflmao:
 
He actually reminds me of Earl Strickland. Earl walked out on a match with Corey because of the soft break.

If you want to talk about a guy that had a right to complain about "break rules" but didn't, talk about Corey. They all but banned the soft break. Was there something in the rules of pool that said you had to hit any shot a certain speed for it to be legal?

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk

Romine's High Pockets, Milwaukee
Earl screwed over ESPN in the process.
The rest is history.
 
I am spaniard, Mano=Hand, but "Mano a mano" means a "man to man" competition
Loose translation. If you look at the historical and literal meaning, it's "hand to hand". Two women can go "Mano a Mano". It isn't "man to man". If you wanted to have a conversation "man to man", it isn't "Mano a Mano". Right? ;)

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
 
Funny thing is Ruslan not near Mosconi team yet
You know Corey offered to play Shane push out after the break ten ball
Shane didn't like it

However break is big part of game and shouldn't be taken away
Difference in this match was after the restart ruslan ran few mini packages stretching lead and
Shane's little dog came out
Comes out a lot at the Mosconi
 
Funny thing is Ruslan not near Mosconi team yet
You know Corey offered to play Shane push out after the break ten ball
Shane didn't like it

However break is big part of game and shouldn't be taken away
Difference in this match was after the restart ruslan ran few mini packages stretching lead and
Shane's little dog came out
Comes out a lot at the Mosconi

Wow. Way too many people WAY too emotionally invested in the outcome of pool matches. Lots of people dogging on Shane. Lots of people saying Shane got screwed by outside factors - the break, the table.

Shane lost a pool match. That's all. No one goes undefeated. Ever. The champs get up, dust themselves off, and play again. Ruslan will learn from this win. Shane will learn from this loss. He will learn to break from outside the box, as there will probably be a lineup of people that want a piece of him, now.

If you're one of the people making excuses for Shane, stop. He isn't offering any excuses, and he doesn't need you to. For the people ganging up on him, it's hard to argue with his resume. A bunch of titles that weren't decided from just the break.

It's a game. Act accordingly.
 
weak weak argument
must suck to be you

He just lives in his own world and he can't control his mouth. He doesn't even understand how ridiculous this post was.

I have no problem with that. Just laughing at posts like that.

Sometimes the truth hurts......
 
Wow. Way too many people WAY too emotionally invested in the outcome of pool matches. Lots of people dogging on Shane. Lots of people saying Shane got screwed by outside factors - the break, the table.

Shane lost a pool match. That's all. No one goes undefeated. Ever. The champs get up, dust themselves off, and play again. Ruslan will learn from this win. Shane will learn from this loss. He will learn to break from outside the box, as there will probably be a lineup of people that want a piece of him, now.

If you're one of the people making excuses for Shane, stop. He isn't offering any excuses, and he doesn't need you to. For the people ganging up on him, it's hard to argue with his resume. A bunch of titles that weren't decided from just the break.

It's a game. Act accordingly.

This is a sports forum. We are acting accordingly.:smile:
 
Back
Top