Another way to look at it is that it takes 3 or more people to drive up my post count just as you did here.
You guys just don't get when you're barking up the wrong tree & continue to chase your own tails.
John Schmidt says CTE works after all.
- Thread starter Sloppy Pockets
- Start date
Another way to look at it is that it takes 3 or more people to drive up my post count just as you did here.
You guys just don't get when you're barking up the wrong tree & continue to chase your own tails.
Or you could just be a man and let things go. You don't have to respond to every post, especially when every single one of your responses is the same.
It's amazing you've made it this far in life.
If one gives in to bullies, one will always be bullied by those bullies.
Just like when one starts jumping on band wagons, after awhile it becomes a senseless habit to jump on band wagons & do no thinking for one's self.
Some mature & grow up & out of such bad habits while others never do.
I'm rather sure that you will 'be a man' & just let this go & not do the same old immature thing of twisting it back onto me...
Not!
What purpose did you have, then? He wasn't a part of this discussion until you steered it in a direction where you felt the need to reference him. He is a friend, and I dont apprdciate it. He was a long time contributor here, involved in many discussions, ni t simply stirring $hit up like seems to be common practice here these days.
Bruce,
I don't follow your last sentence.
Nearly the last thing, if not the last thing, or that I remember, that Sean was posting about was CTE & how he was going to get down to the bottom it, etc. Then he disappeared.
I did NOT intentionally 'steer' anything in any pre-planned direction so I could reference Sean.
With all due respect, Sean is not a friend of mind & I don't appreciate you trying to tell me who I can & can not reference in a discussion.
What is it that you see that I posted that was derogatory regarding Sean?
You've always seemed like a nice guy & one that at times has tried to keep the peace, but in this instance you are acting very much like those that think these forums are their own property for only for their pleasure & how they want them to be & no one should post anything without first getting clearance from them to see if it's okay with them.
If Sean comes to mind again regarding something that he did or said & if I think it is warranted in ANY manner, I will mention him again.
That may not happen at all, but I am not going to avoid mentioning him for no good reason.
He posted here & he is part of the history here & hence certainly available for reference.
I'm sorry if you don't like that but I don't even see any issue.
Can you imagine if I said, guys don't ever mention me ever if I get the boot or decide to leave?
I just don't get what your problem is with me mentioning Sean.
Last edited:
Don't worry when you leave (like before) nobody mentioned you. It was as if you didn't exist.
Your inflated sense of worth needs to come to grips with that.
Jesus is watching.
Last edited:
GoldenFlash
Banned
Mister, you hit that one right out over the roof like Joe Adcock at Ebbets...:thumbup:
Do you even have a Mrs. Jon?
My Wife & I have a Happy & Faithful Marriage coming up on 35 years resulting in 4 adult 'children', 3 of which are well educated with multiple degrees & one on his way & a 2+ year old Grandson & another Grandchild due in a few weeks.
Tell us a bit about your life, Jon.
How many family members have you contributed to their happiness?
You guys are almost unbelievable as to the personal lengths that y'all will stoop down to, in order to try to distract away from what you are incapable of doing...
which is to provide ANY rational & logical explanation to support the provocative & controversial asserted claim that it is 'an objective aiming system'.
The reason that you guys can not do that is because the man that made that asserted claim has not done so either. So you have nothing to parrot in that regard.
Every neutral party that views these threads can see the pitiful attempts that you guys go into the gutter with to try to distort matters & distract away from that simple...
FACT!
Last edited:
Actually that is incorrect as I was talked about for more than a week & mentioned rather often there after when I was on 'vacation'.
Some glad & some not so glad that I was on 'vacation'.
Tell me, who here would miss you or talk about you if you disappeared?
Tell me the same about that other guy too.
Not fact. I'd consider my wife to be a neutral party since she doesn't play and has never once read a word on this forum.
I forced her to read several pages of this discussion and ask her opinion on the posters. She said she couldn't say much about a bunch of grown men arguing about nothing, but this "English" guy is a bona fide nut job.
And she would know, since she has spent the last 20 years as a professional clinical psychologist, diagnosing and treating loonies of all sorts.
Guilty as charged. I think I remember saying something like "ding, dong, the wicked witch is dead", or something of that nature.
Then I quickly forgot you ever existed.
Not fact. I'd consider my wife to be a neutral party since she doesn't play and has never once read a word on this forum.
I forced her to read several pages of this discussion and ask her opinion on the posters. She said she couldn't say much about a bunch of grown men arguing about nothing, but this "English" guy is a bona fide nut job.
And she would know, since she has spent the last 20 years as a professional clinical psychologist, diagnosing and treating loonies of all sorts.
Objection!
Leading the witness, Your Honor.
The witness is hardly neutral as it is reasonable to surmise that since the witness lives with the prosecuting attorney the witness has been influenced by the prosecuting attorney & even if not, the testimony by the prosecuting attorney is hearsay & neither is under oath.
Also, I question the professionalism of any Doctor that would make an official diagnosis based on an incomplete analysis of a long drawn out multi year contentious debate where one side has been totally lacking in any logic by continually denying the reality of the situation.
In fact, to apply clinical means to an individual is completely flawed.
It is just another example of what levels certain parties will go to in order to avoid any reasonable logical explanation of the matters at hand.
The Judge says, "SUSTAINED!"
PS I find it interesting that a supposed professional & the spouse of such would refer to the very sad situation of mental illness as "nut job" & "loonies".
Last edited:
If I did not see your face in that video I would almost swear that you were the alter ego of another that is not with us at this time.
[QUOTE=Sloppy Pockets;5481760]Not fact. I'd consider my wife to be a neutral party since she doesn't play and has never once read a word on this forum.
I forced her to read several pages of this discussion and ask her opinion on the posters. She said she couldn't say much about a bunch of grown men arguing about nothing, but this "English" guy is a bona fide nut job.
And she would know, since she has spent the last 20 years as a professional clinical psychologist, diagnosing and treating loonies of all sorts.[/QUOTE]
If what you say is true, maybe she should pencil you in for an appointment.
I forced her to read several pages of this discussion and ask her opinion on the posters. She said she couldn't say much about a bunch of grown men arguing about nothing, but this "English" guy is a bona fide nut job.
And she would know, since she has spent the last 20 years as a professional clinical psychologist, diagnosing and treating loonies of all sorts.
[/QUOTE]If what you say is true, maybe she should pencil you in for an appointment.
[QUOTE=Sloppy Pockets;5481760]Not fact. I'd consider my wife to be a neutral party since she doesn't play and has never once read a word on this forum.
I forced her to read several pages of this discussion and ask her opinion on the posters. She said she couldn't say much about a bunch of grown men arguing about nothing, but this "English" guy is a bona fide nut job.
And she would know, since she has spent the last 20 years as a professional clinical psychologist, diagnosing and treating loonies of all sorts.
If what you say is true, maybe she should pencil you in for an appointment.
[/QUOTE]
Now now, Anthony.
Two wrongs do not make a right, well...
not most of the time.
Last edited:
[QUOTE=Sloppy Pockets;5481760]Not fact. I'd consider my wife to be a neutral party since she doesn't play and has never once read a word on this forum.
I forced her to read several pages of this discussion and ask her opinion on the posters. She said she couldn't say much about a bunch of grown men arguing about nothing, but this "English" guy is a bona fide nut job.
And she would know, since she has spent the last 20 years as a professional clinical psychologist, diagnosing and treating loonies of all sorts.
If what you say is true, maybe she should pencil you in for an appointment.
[/QUOTE]
She also has extensive experience with substance abuse. May I make an appointment for you at this time?