Two things Dub..(and other zero percenter's)
A...Free streamers production quality and camera work, (except for Fast Lenny) will usually
not be as good as the 'higher end' PPV guys! :grin:
B...Its much easier to follow, if you learn the color of the balls!..... Hint; the cue ball will always
be white.(JK Dub) :grin:
You can't honestly say you never prefer a wider than normal view.
I also wish most of the PPV's were more affordable..I think a lower price, would possibly generate even more income for the streamer..For example, maybe getting only fifty viewers to spring for $50 ea., versus possibly attracting 150 or 200 viewers @ $25 ea.! ..The production cost will always remain the same!
Honestly I can, and I just did. So what # were you looking for anyway? Gee, wonder who that lone 1 vote for the 100% was???
Our last PPV, 'Busty vs Chohan' cost over $7k to produce. This includes everyone else's salaries and profit sharing. The bandwidth cost us almost $1,300.
Looks like you turned out to be the clown, since 0 got more than everything else combined as of this moment, 27-21.
But it is always great to try to shame and name-call people who do not think exactly as you do.
Until it gets turned around on YOU.
I'm not mad if you don't like my poll.
Don't be mad. We like your poll.
We just don't like that you aren't willing to accept the poll's results for what they are. It's like posters who ask "How much is this cue worth?" and then argue with (and insult) people who state a value that's less than the poster assumed. It's rude and unprofessional.
This is not the case. The more viewers you have, the more it costs the streamer to provide the bandwidth. If you have 200 viewers - it costs considerably more to stream that if you have 50 viewers.
Our last PPV, 'Busty vs Chohan' cost over $7k to produce. This includes everyone else's salaries and profit sharing. The bandwidth cost us almost $1,300.
I voted 30%
I just don't believe that if SVB and Alex were playing on the table next to the main stream table people wouldn't want a look over every once in a while..
I am a clownish type of person for sure. No question there.. But I can promise you less than 10% of the zero voters truly wish to be locked in tight on the main table 100% of the time. Think about it, you paid to watch pool action, so the more action the better, right?
I get if though, there probably are a few people who only want to see the main table 100%. But that percentage isn't near as high as this poll might suggest.
I'm not mad if you don't like my poll.
Yes I probably would rather see svb and Alex but not at the expense of an awkward camera angle or cutting back and forth from the main match I was watching. I will add this, if before a match had started or during an extended break or after the match no problem with camera panning around room to show the place .
I agree with this..that's why I voted 10%. I realize the Tournament director decides who gets on the stream table, but maybe some input from the streamer would be wise?
now we've got 8 zero's. I marketed the 0% option to the clown demographic. Just won't count these votes in my sampling..
Obviously no one prefers 0% all of the time, these people are being clowns as usual. Can't have a decent poll around here. This place is going to hell...
Have a nice week..
Wow..I had no clue about the bandwidth cost, Daniel..Sure changes my perspective. I do know some of the pitfalls of streaming, as I'm good friends with Lenny, but I guess that particular subject never came up!
PS..May I ask how many viewers it took to incur a $1300.00 BW cost? (if its none of my business, just say so..no problem)