A Few CTE Questions

So yesterday, I watched the first several videos of Stan Shuffett's CTE Pro-1 series. I then listened to them for several more hours while on my route as a mailman today so I could really let it sink into my subconscious. Then after I got home from work it was straight to the practice table. All I can really say is WOW. I've been a pretty good shot maker for awhile now (I have to credit CJ Wiley and his videos for that.) But this was another level I've never gotten to up until now. I worked on this for about 3 hours, and by the end, I was just a total sniper. The shots that have always given me the most problems are the side-pocket shots at those tough angles where you really have a tiny window. But with this, I was making them at nearly a 100% clip with ease. I was pretty skeptical about all of this, but decided to give those videos my full attention and give it a chance, and I really am glad I did now. My only minor gripe is that Stan is a bit off-center himself, so the delivery of his information is a bit awkward at times, and the cadence at which he speaks throws me off from time to time as well. However, I guess he did just fine because I remembered everything he talked about once I got on the table and I had no problems putting it all into practice. I think he is genuinely passionate about this stuff.

So I combined everything CJ taught me through his videos as far as stance and that pop-stroke and being consistent in everything I do, with this CTE Pro-1 to aim. I only missed a few balls in that whole 3 hours, and each time, the reason for the miss was easily identifiable. With that said, I do have a few questions for seasoned CTE users:

- Almost all of, if not all of the few shots I did miss were because I picked the wrong reference point (A when I should have used B, and vice versa. Or maybe using B when I should have used C). Is there a way to tell which one has to be used or does that just come through experience? It didn't happen often, but there were a few tricky angles that were kind of "tweeners" and I picked the wrong one.

- Once you get your aiming line with your head tilted using parallax vision, are you then focusing your vision straight down the center of that line with your head still tilted, or are you turning your head back straight ahead and aiming straight down the aiming line? I was doing the latter, and that felt correct.

- Is it necessary to pivot at all, or is that an entirely different, more advanced way of doing this? I was doing no pivoting whatsoever. I was finding my aiming line using the parallax vision, stepping into that line, and delivering the shot. That's it. And like I was saying, I was making literally 98% of my shots no matter the distance from the CB to OB, or length of the shot. Everything was just... automatic. I felt how Larry Bird must have felt like in all those 3-point contests. Is it ok just to stick with this, or do you recommend learning all the pivoting as well?

- I was doing this practice on a bar table. How much more fickle is this on a 9-footer? I play most of my matches on the 9-footers and I wonder how much different it will be when I take it onto those. If I can snipe like this on a 9-footer, I'll be sold for life.

Color me intrigued! I'm definitely going to be spending more time on this. It was kind of mind-blowing how well it worked, and it was really fun to use. By the end, I really had a lot of confidence in every shot I took. I knew I was going to make it before I even got down on the ball. It really just clicks.
 
Making 98% of your shots. Congrats you now have an 85% chance of running a rack. You are now the best pool player in the world with those stats.
He’s been playing a whole year, learned both “magic” systems (TOI and CTE), and now (of course) makes “literally 98%” of his shots. How could he not be the best in the world?

lol

pj
chgo
 
i hope he uses TAOM chalk. if he is not i think shifting to TAOM will help with the remaining 2%. also as an added benefit he will be near 100% cleaner player. Also will help lower carbon footprint
 
He’s been playing a whole year, learned both “magic” systems (TOI and CTE), and now (of course) makes “literally 98%” of his shots. How could he not be the best in the world?

lol

pj
chgo
He has successfully explained that he has no clue what he don't know yet. Sounds like a brand new "member" on a fishing expedition to me.
 
He has successfully explained that he has no clue what he don't know yet. Sounds like a brand new "member" on a fishing expedition to me.
You have successfully made claims, then when asked to back up your claims, you go into hiding.

Where are your CAD drawings? You said it was so easy to prove CTE on CAD, do it, settle the debate for everyone.

Option two, let's hear a cowards excuse or silence, which one is it?
 
Last edited:
Between Thresh, sos911, and Patrick Johnson, who is the best player out of the three? Rank yourselves 1-3
What does our rank matter? You have already taken the title as the best pool player in the world. Everyone else on the planet is under you.
 
You have successfully made claims, then when asked to back up your claims, you go into hiding.
well it's like this, I see no point in arguing a point with people who refuse to actually try the system correctly, yet proclaim for years that it does not work, that being DW and PJ, when I know for sure it does work because it does so for me and others, so that's good enough, and then there is you, who have added nothing of value to any CTE thread I have seen your little smart ass remarks in, about any topic honestly, so I pretty much just turned you off. No time for you,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
 
well it's like this, I see no point in arguing a point with people who refuse to actually try the system correctly, yet proclaim for years that it does not work, that being DW and PJ, when I know for sure it does work because it does so for me and others, so that's good enough, and then there is you, who have added nothing of value to any CTE thread I have seen your little smart ass remarks in, about any topic honestly, so I pretty much just turned you off. No time for you,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
You said you can easily prove it, you made that claim, not me. I'm an engineer, I say go ahead, prove it, I would love to see it proven, finally, settle the debate. I encourage you to do it.

But, as predicted, you are a coward, have given a cowards excuse, now, of course, I'm not with the "time" , that's the "silence" part of your pathetic excuse.

So far, you are the one making claims, not me. When asked to back your claims up, you are an absolute timid coward. Scared little creature.

The worst part is, when you first made your claims, you claimed it was so easy yet I wouldn't understand it, no one would, only you apparently could understand it...

Then when pressed to back your claims up, you go into hiding, like a complete coward.
 
i hope he uses TAOM chalk. if he is not i think shifting to TAOM will help with the remaining 2%. also as an added benefit he will be near 100% cleaner player. Also will help lower carbon footprint
Downside is soon having his lungs melt because of that micro stuff.
 
Back
Top