maybe he is but today, fedor played poorlyFiller is the best rotation player of all time.
maybe he is but today, fedor played poorly
and this is a skittles table
with the peculiar set 1- set 2- shootout-
so i’m not giving him the crown just yet
It is still difficult for me to imagine anyone wanting a piece of Joshua in 9- or 10-ball in a long match. At least if the backers like their money.maybe he is but today, fedor played poorly
and this is a skittles table
with the peculiar set 1- set 2- shootout-
so i’m not giving him the crown just yet
Filler is the best rotation player of all time.
You will not beat Filler in most short set races. Has to be a long race to see if he will break down mentally/stamina.Yes, no doubt JF played great in the final BUT i would not put too much stock in the results from this format. I like it for the brevity and excitement but as far as determining the best player not so much. I'd love to see these two play 3/5 or 4/7 races to 15/20. Not a fan of one big set. Filler's precision(shooting and safeties) IS alien-like when he's in hi-gear.
races to 15/20 are not short sets.You will not beat Filler in most short set races. Has to be a long race to see if he will break down mentally/stamina.
Do you mean multiple sets of races to 20 to determine a winner like the Predator series? A single race to 20 is like a practice session for Filler. You have to get him grinding for hours to see what he got.races to 15/20 are not short sets.
Such the irony. It's harder to beat Filler in multiple sets, as in the Predator format, than in single sets (races to 9, etc).You will not beat Filler in most short set races. Has to be a long race to see if he will break down mentally/stamina.
Filler is the best rotation player of all time.
maybe he is but today, fedor played poorly
and this is a skittles table
with the peculiar set 1- set 2- shootout-
so i’m not giving him the crown just yet
did you even read what i posted? is there some part of 3/5, 4/7 you didn't get? want me to type slow? MULTIPLE sets. i think 4/7 sets race to 30 would be perfect. have ZERO desire to watch one long set, by ANY player.Do you mean multiple sets of races to 20 to determine a winner like the Predator series? A single race to 20 is like a practice session for Filler. You have to get him grinding for hours to see what he got.
I didn't pick up the 3/5, 4/7 when I sped read it first. A 4/7 set race to 30 could potentially end up with 413 racks, if my math is correct. Nobody is going to play that.did you even read what i posted? is there some part of 3/5, 4/7 you didn't get? want me to type slow? MULTIPLE sets. i think 4/7 sets race to 30 would be perfect. have ZERO desire to watch one long set, by ANY player.
Who manufactures the ARC tables for Predator? Where?
The big difference between Filler and Gorst, to me, is the ease with which Filler plays. It's just as skogstokig describes.filler's a freak of nature. he's a lot like earl in some ways (eerily accurate, instinctual, spears the cue ball) but with a heap of tactical skills, banking and two way strategic moves.
I think Filler is a better player today because he plays the percentages rather than being flat out aggressive and relying heavily on his excellent shot making as he did couple years ago. Now, he goes for safeties when it's in his favor.The big difference between Filler and Gorst, to me, is the ease with which Filler plays. It's just as skogstokig describes.
Gorst, on the other hand, seems like he has to work harder to get to the same plane, and then stay there.
It's more than that, though. Filler has methodically worked on every part of his game, turning any potential soft spot into a strength.
Three or four years ago, he was a very good banker. Now he's a great one - one of a handful who is the best in the world. Ditto for kicking.
Sjm has asserted Filler was the best player in the world with safeties and tactics. I didn't see it initially. Now I do. He was superb vs Gorst.
The one big advantage Gorst has, of course, is jumping. Filler is a excellent jumper, but he is not in Fedor's league. Nor do I get the sense that Filler wants to be like Gorst in that regard.
How come? Filler is better at avoiding scenarios, when he has control of a table, in which he would need to jump. The match vs. Gorst was a good example. Gorst needed to jump several times to clean up his own mistakes.
I would also guess Filler sees jumping as a high-risk proposition that's often not worth it. Easier to lose control of the cueball. He is definitely a percentage player. I've seen too many players jump when kicking was the better option. It lowers their chances of keeping control of the table.