uk_9_ball_convert
Active member
I'm supporting ABR this tournament. Anyone But Ronnie. As a Scot, I don't want him to beat Hendry's record.
too late!I'm supporting ABR this tournament. Anyone But Ronnie. As a Scot, I don't want him to beat Hendry's record.
Doubt winning 5 in a row by Hendry will ever be matched. Guy just had a different mentality. Changed the game, before him it used to be try to score 30-40 points on the loose reds then play a safety, where Hendry would pot the blue and go into the pack smashing everything open. Cloths were a lot slower back then so you couldn't do the delicate shots they do now to loosen a few reds at a time. Equipment's changed a lot over the years, so not sure how much you can compare players from different eras, but Reardon, Davis and Hendry dominated their era in a way Ronnie hasn't. Just don't think Ronnie has the same temperament and grit of those serial winners, though nobody can deny his talent.too late!
we all know who is the better player
6, 7, 8 crucible titles, doesn’t tell the whole story
Well Scott is my heritage and I am unaware of a dispute or diss of any nature.![]()
He Guoqiang must feel sacrificial down 5-0 going to 10.
Okay, i understand now. Keeping a conflict on the fields of Friendly Strife allows a genuine congratulations at the final handshake. Most of my side wagers ha: been for a beer.the masters crowd used to be quite tribal back in the days when the scots played.. ding got a dose of that tribalism at his first masters 20 or so years ago. it has changed a lot since then, to the better. maybe with ticket price gentrification, but i like to think not
Davis and Hendry dominated their era in a way Ronnie hasn't. Just don't think Ronnie has the same temperament and grit of those serial winners, though nobody can deny his talent.
Doubt winning 5 in a row by Hendry will ever be matched. Guy just had a different mentality. Changed the game, before him it used to be try to score 30-40 points on the loose reds then play a safety, where Hendry would pot the blue and go into the pack smashing everything open. Cloths were a lot slower back then so you couldn't do the delicate shots they do now to loosen a few reds at a time. Equipment's changed a lot over the years, so not sure how much you can compare players from different eras, but Reardon, Davis and Hendry dominated their era in a way Ronnie hasn't. Just don't think Ronnie has the same temperament and grit of those serial winners, though nobody can deny his talent.
Definitely interesting to see their runs to the final. Though Hendry is probably playing less World Champions because that dominant period he had meant there wasn't many other world champions about. Practically every tournament he had to beat Jimmy White, who if he'd been born slightly earlier or slightly later would probably have been a multi times champion. 1996 undeniably had a fairly easy run.Not to take anything away from Hendry, but how dominant you are has a lot to do with who you have play against. I enjoy these discussion because it lets me geek out and look up the data.
I compared Hendry's dominant 5 year run to the last 5 WC's that Ronnie won. (highlighted names are World Champions)
View attachment 899139
I don't think you can compare the number of centuries when the equipment has changed so much. Modern cloths far faster which makes it much easier to develop balls. And last few seasons some of the top players have been complaining they've been making the pockets too easy, which narrows their advantage over the weaker players.noone is saying hendry used to play the janitor, but the stats don't lie. the competition is much tougher now, more centuries, higher pot success etc.
The 2002 World Championship would've been Hendy"s 8th if he had beaten Peter Ebdon. He had 16 centuries during that event and he put it to O"Sullivan 17-13. O"sullivan had been saying he'll send Hendry back to his sad little life.Doubt winning 5 in a row by Hendry will ever be matched. Guy just had a different mentality. Changed the game, before him it used to be try to score 30-40 points on the loose reds then play a safety, where Hendry would pot the blue and go into the pack smashing everything open. Cloths were a lot slower back then so you couldn't do the delicate shots they do now to loosen a few reds at a time. Equipment's changed a lot over the years, so not sure how much you can compare players from different eras, but Reardon, Davis and Hendry dominated their era in a way Ronnie hasn't. Just don't think Ronnie has the same temperament and grit of those serial winners, though nobody can deny his talent.
I don't think you can compare the number of centuries when the equipment has changed so much. Modern cloths far faster which makes it much easier to develop balls. And last few seasons some of the top players have been complaining they've been making the pockets too easy, which narrows their advantage over the weaker players.
He's often said he approached the final with the wrong attitude as in his head he'd pretty much won it when he beat Ronnie. Think it's one of his biggest regrets.The 2002 World Championship would've been Hendy"s 8th if he had beaten Peter Ebdon. He had 16 centuries during that event and he put it to O"Sullivan 17-13. O"sullivan had been saying he'll send Hendry back to his sad little life.
I don't think you can compare the number of centuries when the equipment has changed so much. Modern cloths far faster which makes it much easier to develop balls. And last few seasons some of the top players have been complaining they've been making the pockets too easy, which narrows their advantage over the weaker players.