Search results

Joe is from where I’m originally from and he is super knowledgeable about the rack. I remember pros flying Joe out for the weekend before big tournaments to try and learn his secrets. This was before the dvd’s became popular. I learned a lot from Joe Tucker and will always be grateful to call...

Joe Tucker is the rack master!

The more this guy types the more he sounds like a 450.

Since you're so familiar with APA I've seen 3's break and run on a 7 footer but never on a 9 footer. With a good break where you make a few balls and the table is open it's very easy to run out on a 7 footer. That's not the case on a 9 footer because of the distance.

Break and run percentages are much higher on a 7 footer compared to a 9 footer so I'm not sure what you're getting at?

You just said you were playing the guy for money the other day so I assumed you would the next time as well.

Because you’re a fish who thinks he is a shark! My bad a sheep who thinks he is a wolf.

He has stated it in this thread.

He is around 480 with 450 games robustness.

Yeah let’s base it on APA, a league where half the players are drunk having a fun night out. If I were trying to tell people I am a strong player I would not be mentioning my APA league stats to qualify my play but that’s just me. You sound more like a sheep than a wolf.

My guess the reason this guy is supposedly always playing 600+ Fargo players and spots 550’s is because he is a fish and thinks he plays way better than he does. He probably talks this same nonsense in the pool room and the real players just play to his ego. My guess is he loses way more than he...

This guy is either delusional or the best 480 to ever play! Two and three packs are the norm for a 480 LMAO. I’m surprised this guy just doesn’t travel the country playing 500 and under events. He would probably make more than he does landscaping the way he mows down the table.

The guy from the losers side probably had to win twice as many matches to get to the finals so I’d say single elimination is more than fair for the finals.

Up

And while it may be required to call all combos it does not mean your opponent needs to call you on it when the shot is so obvious. But like I said to each their own win however you can by all means necessary. I'll be the better sport myself and never call that on my opponent. Again it goes...

How is it not a foul if it results in losing your turn at the table?

I am very familiar with the rules I just would never call a foul on a shot that obvious. Personally I don't want to win like that but to each their own. Calling a foul was totally unnecessary in this particular instance imo because it goes against the spirit of the rule.

Lee Van Corteza has already won a major imo! He has won China Open, Japan Open, Philippine Championships, Derby City and many more titles.

Bump

It could happen before Matchroom though!