Search results

i believe stan is correct and you are also ... you teach yourself that you need to "hit here" to make the system/alignments/shot work ...

... thats it?

inside A ...

Personally I will look at the shot and recognise that its an in between shot and choose which alignment would be best for that particular shot based on shape, how im shooting that day, or the weather outside,etc ...

practice, practice and more practice and put on your thinking hat, hows that?

it doesnt work for you because the system doesnt 100% put you on the shot and you have to make a minor tweak somehow? your not robot or able to draw lines on the table for every shot, subconsense adjustments will be made as you learn the system but if you look at like your a robot you will...

?? is this a troll comment, what are you saying

i got very interested in it when some random guy here posted a cte youtube video of Hals houles version and also watching spiderweb com (dave) cte bank videos 10+ years ago, i seen a lot of potential in it, when stans first CD came out, i picked it up pretty easily and have used it ever since...

I'm a big hockey fan and pretty knowledgeable, I used to read and see these terrible tweets/posts by hockey analytics bloggers/people which I knew were bad and annoying to read and if you questioned them you were brushed off cause they were stat guys, etc ..so the only way I could debate these...

its kinda obvious that there is trolling going on here from both sides, it's been going on for a decade or so, you know that lol So what's your opinion on the cte pro1 system PJ? Do you feel you're informed enough now to give an honest unbiased opinion or?

well with pro1 you always have the alignments and the system engraved in your mind and are aware of it from shot to shot and it's easy to slide back into the systems basics if you're struggling,etc if need be ... with those other techniques you brought up, if you're struggling for whatever...

nice run with basically the same alignment or visuals for evey shot, i think the system frees up the mind and you can focus more on reading the rack,shape,etc ...

im not sure about the comparison or point you are trying to make, how is it exactly like ghostball or fractional aiming, explain do you mean the end result?

i picked up stans system fairly easily off the first cd ... after years of using the system i can just see the shot and the lane i need to be in without much thought, i still miss shots ... i think a pro player will take part(s) of pro1 and apply it to there own way of aiming,etc ... my point is...

so a guy mistakenly said stans book is out when it isnt and you guys want to do a cancel culture thing on him? lol

For me Pro1 evolved from looking/seeing lines/edges to just stepping into lanes createed by the pro1 visuals and just seeing the shot and i always had the systems basics to fall back on if i was unsure about something

it looks like dave cleared up the issues you had with stan,greta and dave

its very posible she used a part of pro1 to help tweak her own aiming method... she added to her own personal system/method

i'm curious, do you have an issue with pro1 the system or is it just the online users

https://i.imgur.com/809c9I8.mp4