Search results

Actually, it's like this...... by copying only PART of the interior they have actually created a situation where the cues hit each other with extra force with every bump in the road. The cases were (and probably still are) missing several inches of liner at the bottom which means that the a...

Bro I 100% understand your sentiment. For me it's a matter of principle and making sure that the record is straight. you know how I found out that Mike had even posted? My daughter and I were having a conversation about the internet and how things never die there and she googled me and this...

No you haven't. you have engaged in years of attempting to troll me and been met with logical rebuttals each time. Go ahead and post your "evidence" if you have any. You are correct however that lack of evidence doesn't mean something didn't happen. The burden is on the ACCUSER though and...

Correct. And I am glad he showed up. Just not happy that I missed this four years ago. Now I can answer the lies he directly told right here.

LOL just because people put their cues into a piece of shit and those cues survive a trip doesn't make the piece of shit case into something protective. It means that they got lucky and will continue to be lucky until they aren't. And yes you are free to knockoff anything you want to just...

Tell it to the guy who picked the fight then. I wasn't the one who tried to "bully" with a 20k challenge and got called and raised to 50k.

Another lie. I went to your booth at the 2019 US Open for ONE REASON ONLY. The challenge YOU posted on Facebook. I went to your booth and asked you how you wanted to go about the challenge. And that was a cordial interaction where you asked me if I had a lawyer who could do the contract and...

Correct and if I had seen that Mike posted then I would answered him then. I want my side on the record for the record. Not about ego, it is about truth.

Bullying you? You're the one who produced knockoffs of my designs and then tried to claim that I knocked you off. You're the one who lies about these knockoffs to sell them. And when you finally stepped up with a bullshit "challenge" based on MORE lies where you accused me of bullying your...

well, somehow I missed that you actually showed up to respond. The high road huh? You flat out filed a false police report accusing me of something I did not do and then used that FALSE report to attempt to blackball me from the shows. You were successful at getting me removed from the US...

100% agree. And the guy who got second is the cue repair guy in the room. He is also a legit 600 with 3k games. I put him in the tournament on a whim to say thanks for all the support. No one expected him to get to the finals or the final day. Not because he can't play but because he is...

Well, number one you might not be able to do that and number 2 the promoter has specified that IF you were 585 or higher in the year before the tournament you are not eligible. We just had a 600 and under $1000 entry in my room in July. 128 players. The favorites didn't win and didn't get in...

Al is the worthy successor to Justis imo. I have said this in the past that Al's work is better than Justis in a similar style but better overall leather work and craftsmanship. As Justis built better cases than the J.E.F. Q Cases (Jay Flowers) that he emulated so too does Al Kinghorn build...

Lol. Live Sales. Cheapcues.com Jacoby cues Jerry Olivier cues Brendan Sullivan on Facebook Several others.... Just post a wanted post in open Billiards market and those who have JB Cases for sale will show up.

Nobody said any such thing at the venue. No one I spoke with thought that any participant from Arizona was underrated.

128 players came. The winner took home $50,000. Second place $25,000.

Not with a robustness of 9. You're not established. Anyone who spots you based on your current unestablished rating is a fool or they already know that they can win despite the spot.

for a casual player that come in at 660 and not to know what the ghost is I would be pretty proud of that. You're an above average player for sure!

I am ok with it. Because I can also correlate it with the effort to improve by watching ratings go up as skills are acquired and sharpened. Fargo gives goals that are concrete and not nebulous.

This is correct that any system that depends on user-generated data which is partially or in full controlled by the user can have inaccurate results based on flawed input. Each player essentially has one thing almost fully under their control and that is the choice to lose on purpose. I say...