Search results

It's not a foul. I don't even have to watch it twice, all you need to know is how reactions work. That refereee is so bad its amusing to me. I even saw him made lots of bad calls in the past, one that struck to me is him calling a foul on a shot where he thinks it hit another ball first merely...

No, well.... domination is good for any sport, its really good because you got people divided into grps where they watch someone because they love him so much or they watch someone because they hate him so much... either way its so good for any sport. Removing this is a big issue for any sport...

With time some of you will see it but let me remind everyone as I've seen some previous posts about a GUY going into some certain poolhall and beating bangers on his SMALL POCKETS. This isn't about you going to a POOLHALL beating some bangers or winning local tournaments thus PROVING that you...

They will never adjust making pockets like this, its unplayable....you gave them big disadvantage meanwhile the weaker pro's nothing changed to them except for the fact that they rely on the misses and LEAVES of their opponents, and will runout when LAYOUTS are easy which is again relying on the...

This guy also gets it....at least I saw 3 people who can see this issue deep enough, with that I am happy. I'll convince the rest of you when we have 20 tournaments played on this tight pockets, I hope you see it more, note that second paragraph which I highlighted from jsp, this is exactly...

I know what missing on the pro side thank you, but you can't always use this because they're not you nor I...these are pro's who only have one thing in their heads, running out....plus you can't even use this all the time, as well as you use it on difficult long cut shots but hey....I know its...

Think of it like this alright. The weaker PRO (Not bad player he runs out but I'm talking about the non top 20 players, these guys are good enough but not as good as Fedor/SVB/Jushua etc): These guys will miss shots on big pockets due to fundemental or whatever, as well will miss shots on...

This guy also understands, I'm here not talking about a hillybilly versus a pro. I'm talking about the disadvantage a TOP 5 players are getting versus another pro that isnt as good as them. sooner or later you guys will start seeing it, its new i'll give you more time to see statistics and...

No you're missing the point too, I can't believe this...I'm in fact shocked.

Snooker is a completely different game, it flourished because of its style and class. It's also a game which has repetitive layout, positioning, its superb in terms of making you practice same layouts and becoming good at it because you keep pocketing the same localized colors over and over...

4.5 arent tight enough. to me thats default and good pocket size, ask them to make it 4 inch pockets like these matchroom tables, or 4.25 I think they make them sometimes, then you'll see a new winner of tournaments each time, you will never see one or two guys dominating ever again .I am not...

If you comparing snooker to pool, its about ratio not pocket size. But I do believe if they made snooker pockets bigger Ronnie would dominate even more. But the ratio of the snooker ball to pockets are decent, but when they tighten them Ronnie would start be at almost the same level as others...

they wont have the edge you're missing the point, but their chance of beating you has increased, significantly.

Now this above scenario that I've wrote doesn't paint the whole picture because who am I? a nobody when it comes to these guys....but now think of it when comparing a TOP 5 dominant player the likes of Joshua Filler against a PRO. The fact that he's playing on tighter pocket wouldn't help Filler...

Yes 100%, moving to a tighter table will increase the likelihood that the weaker player wins, period. He wont win the game 100% but his chance will increase against a better opponent. If I play against Fedor Gorst on a 4.5 inch pockets my chance of beating him is ZEROOOOOOO, he'll run out 3-4...

Oh it can, don't just think about it...go test it out with numbers and statistics you'll be amazed.

This guy gets it, but once I explain it...some of you might see the bigger picture....playing on tight pockets with lesser opponent than you is a suicidal...because you get normal out that you'll get out 95% of the time but because the pockets are very tight there's a big chance where you miss...

Far from the truth, but the smaller pockets made you think that we have large amount of talents meanwhile I know for fact that we have 3-4 PLAYERS who are FAR BETTER THAN MOST, i.e. domination, but these 3-4 cannot shine because of the smaller pockets....bring back the old table conditions and...

But they are not, thats the thing...we need more data and years to see this play out but I am sure the more tournaments the more of this you will see....a new face, a new guy who would never win a major normally, he would in these conditions.

Finally someone who gets it, ill convince you on #2 soon - just give me a moment to write it down, but here's the thing, when I say favors the weaker player it does not mean the weaker will always win, thats not what I meant. Rather what I meant is, the weaker player will have an increased...