Search results

Thank you. You may go away now.

I dried my ears off (mostly anyway) on 10 and 12 foot snooker tables - pool balls of course. I doubt pros would have issues with a big table - they got the game itself wired. Filler and Gorst...

I know this but Donny keeps bothering me... wahh...:cry: FWIW, I'm a Gorst fan. Maybe now Yapp makes the list too. lol.

IMO they only need to stay on it. Especially WMs supposed meticulous position. Big Foot have big position zone and lots of breathing room.

Don't even know what you mean there^^ Run out of angles? Speeder is the same way. Irrefutably correct irrelevence or nuthin. Anything else you wish to discuss before I start comparing you to Donny?

I've watched both videos posted here and can reach no other conclusion. Just show me where the hit is on either.

We've all seen hanging balls Yoda' d in after catching their breath and rules have been created to deal with "spontaneous motion". Right now the best possibility for that is the strike on the cue ball itself. But that's just guessing at it.

Funny. I'm 51 / 49 no foul so what Yapp thought at the time isn't even a point of concern. There are many anomalies in the slomo "proof" clip. At presented speed, the stroke looks faster than it should be and the ball does jog as if fouled. At frame x frame, there is no movement at the possible...

SHOW.

I'm talking view left. You're just flailing.

Why would DD.Edu have proof? From what's available here, even a computer lab could only render an opinion.

That is incorrect. Balls are known to spontaneously change feet. And in this case there was sufficient energy imparted into the table by the downward stroke. This is supported by the 9 only tipping to the left after everything else had transpired.

Simple. Yes I see movement. Show me the foul.

One thing, Newton won't allow is a 90 degree graze will impart no energy but contact would have to be visible to assess a foul.

Clear to whom? Frinstense, stick passes right through the contact zone - shadow and all - without moving the 9. Also public web is not reliable forensics. Exabit interference and all...

Watch the WCs circa 2000. Players find ways to screw up - like the pressure lol. Sure it's real. Bending to it is real. Cut to now. Buckets are boring at the majors level. Players have tuned themselves if only their self esteem, to an elite frame of mind. Buckets would be incongruous and...

Lol I used to wait for this show!

Curious to know what tipped your reason. Per anything posted in this thread the 9 did not oscillate. It did move to the left and the curious are left to extrapolate - imaginate if you will, a foul. On refs: minimum of 2 refs - at least in these big finals. In the Philippines, they have guys...

JFTR, I mean Vegas show magic. IOW anything fakeable will be faked. It's cheaper for one thing... :ROFLMAO:

I get this. You tube no less. Still, claiming absolute foul with no forensic evidence is disturbing.