Search results

Think of it as shooting a rifle in a crosswind - the stronger the wind the larger the range of estimation needed - the larger the range of estimation the larger the potential miss. But we aren’t as consistently accurate with it. Huh? pj chgo

I agree he does - so why tilt the pic to exaggerate? pj chgo

You could do that more accurately/reliably without deflection (if that was possible) by simply pointing the CB in the “deflected” direction. Deflection just complicates things. pj chgo

Remember dime bags? $15 ounces? You might be a Boomer.

Their pet bat took the pic?

You have to fine tune your aim to include deflection, but it's never useful, always an added complication. Aiming would always be easier without it. pj chgo

To my way of thinking it's both - action/reaction - but the important result (what I call squirt) is the cue ball's motion. Thanks for the info (I knew you had it in you :)). pj chgo

By claiming to know things they can't describe? pj chgo

In my experience, those who know can explain. pj chgo

I don’t see a connection… deflection is tip/ball interaction; carom angle is ball/ball…? pj chgo

The top pic is tilted 45 degrees to the right to make it look more dramatic. Usual Facebook BS.

If you don’t know how, how do you know it’s real? pj chgo

How can deflection be used to advantage? pj chgo

Pardon my ignorance, but how does parallax affect aiming - how should it be corrected for? pj chgo

If you like the feel I don't see what else could be wrong... except maybe lower deflection than you're accustomed to? pj chgo

How (and why) should parallax be addressed? https://drdavepoolinfo.com/faq/eyes/vision-center/ pj chgo

What’s to “discuss”? We all understand and agree on everything about it. pj chgo