Search results

Your swoop stroke during testing doesn’t help. Pops up too many times. It seems you’re still not understanding the premise. Of why people say this. You’re literally testing to achieve a specific result. No testing to get varying results.

Are you really that ignorant right now? If I have to stroke a hard tip with a ‘more delicate’ touch, that should be and indication that something is wrong with his claims.

The easiest answer is, it’s complex. The hard answer is, looking at just tip contact time does not answer the question. The other factors not being looked at are linear cue ball speed after contact, and actual rpm’s of the cue ball. The only thing Dr Dave was looking for was results that matched...

You were claiming it was a myth, now you’re saying it’s not a myth? But by measuring standards and not actual play it’s a small difference? But by play standards is quite massive. You’re a clown anymore man.

Maybe you’re misunderstanding the premise of the issue. You’re testing to achieve a specific result. You’re not testing to get all results, only the results that please your idea. Everything else is continually dismissed. There’s a 1ms variance, which is an increase of 100% from hard to soft. A...

The math says there’s a variable too large to be dismissed. You can keep drinking your koolaid thinking you’re Mr cool around here. The variance between the tip contact from .8ms to 1.9ms is too large to let it slide. You cannot tell me a 100% increase in contact time is negligible, and a non...

That’s one of those things that needs to be tested better. Dr Dave never does full proper testing. He always implies a conclusion that isn’t supported all the time by the evidence provided. There is something missing in the data. How can a cue with a soft tip, an approximate 70% CoR. And a cue...

This is hilarious. In a real scientific setting a variance of +/- 50% from the initial starting point will never be described as negligible. How the hell can one tip literally double the contact time from another tip, and that time is decided as a non-factor? Something smells like bullshit will...

This is where you’ve created a problem. You’re using a set speed for your testing. It needs to be a variable speed. You need a slow/medium/fast strike on the cue ball with each hardness. That way there’s a full table of data to interpret. The math behind all of this says that a soft tip should...

Your conclusion that the difference in tip contact tip time has no variance on how much spin/speed is imparted on the cue ball needs to be supported with evidence. You have not included any evidence, in this video or in previous videos to make such a claim. You claim that just the numbers are so...

You’d be dead wrong.

Oh it most certainly does. When I switched the shaft on my jump cue and retained the same butt, I was over hitting every jump. It’s not a question of which jumps, but all of them became easier. And I’ll say right now anyone can jump/make a ball. How many people do you watch that have control on...

Meh, I’ll accept the apology. Realistically, if it’s acceptable tolerance at the joint, and seats tight. It should be fine. As far as acceptable as for what was ordered, no.

Kinda seems like it’s Pechauer, or Jackson style insert.

Use the 10 ball as a replacement for the 9 ball. But hell, if you can’t remember when the 9 was made by looking at the adjoining balls in the window. Then how do you remember whose turn it is?

A flat face 5/16-14 shaft will screw onto United pin without a problem. My Jacoby BLaCk shafts with their standard 5/16-14 pilot will screw onto my United pins just fine. That’s my experience with trying to use a United pin with a 5/16-14 shaft. My United jointed shafts screw on universally to...

You were not hacked. The proper term is phished. To get hacked in today’s world is near impossible. Phishing on the other hand is simple.

That’s laughable, they still haven’t gotten back to my inquiries about if they’ll ever have certain products back in stock.

Technically speaking thermoform is the method in which the plastic is melted and either extruded or formed. In which I should say juma is a thermoformed plastic. Because we’re talking about a sold product and not the pellets used to make it.

Sorry but no. Both are plastics, ones a thermoset and ones thermoform.