Search results

Just the opposite. Experience tends to retard the learning of CTE. By the way, how does electricity actually work? How is it that the planets are just where they are? Need I go on with things you don't understand the answers to? I'm sure the list is quite long. Shall I add in exactly why you...

lol. Like I said, you have ears, but do not hear.

He's not talking about normal force follow here. And if you don't think fast twitch muscle fiber has anything to do arm speed, you don't know much about boxing. At denwhits age, he isn't likely to be able to duplicate that shot.

I's all in the speed of the stroke with both of you hitting the same spot on the cb as a given. His arm length helps, but the amount of fast twitch muscle fiber makes a big difference.

He's got his head in the right place. He believes in himself. Doubt has been the fall of many a player.

Your thinking falls short. You are so bent on trying to disprove, that you have made yourself incapable of any real life improvement. You have eyes to see, but do not see. Ears to hear, but do not hear. You can scoff all day long. But that will never help you make one iota of improvement in...

You keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better about yourself. Even though it's a bunch of bull easily disproved. If it was about helping others, you would be doing it for many other topics. Ones that really matter. Not just CTE. The real reason you post so much against CTE is just...

And who ever said that a good stroke is not necessary in CTE? In fact just the opposite has been stated many times. As far as objectivity, your system has the same problem that you claim makes CTE not objective- CIT. You can't claim that it gives you an objective aim point to pocket the ball if...

Looks great!

That's because you are nitpicking again and adding into what he actually stated. But since that is what you want to do, you claim your system is objective. Does your system magically eliminate the variables you are claiming are faults with CTE?

What we realize is is that we have given you way too much credit in the past. Thanks for fixing that for us!

You, of all the naysayers, should shut your trap about the word objective. You claim your system is objective, yet has the same issues you find fault with CTE for. You guys are nothing but a bunch of hypocrites. Like I said earlier, you people are more concerned with tearing down someone else...

1. Ask yourself why you are so obsessed with nitpicking everything Stan says. 2. Listen to it again. You missed pertinent parts while looking for something to pick at. 3. Why not take it to the table and see for yourself? Oh, never mind, you don't know how to use it, so you can't do that.

Try watching the video.

Very true. Although this has all been stated already, just not with a big X for those that don't want to read the map to see where they are going. If Dan would actually read with the end goal being to learn instead of to see what he can nit pick next, he would already know this. They have...

Same ol', same ol'. You know, if you weren't so obsessed with nit-picking every little comment, and instead listened with an ear to learn, you might actually learn something. ;)

Well, if you really can't help doing it over and over, maybe you should seek out some professional help? Maybe if you actually listened to the info, you wouldn't keep parroting the same wrong responses? Worth a try, yes?

Of course I will be. You can't handle it when a light is shown on the nonsense you post to knock CTE.

Don't make the mistake of thinking that an AIMING system is a complete package to playing great pool. I will gladly take an aiming system that puts me to center pocket with using center line cb over one that doesn't. Any adjustments for known factors such as english are then easily adjusted for.