Search results

Really...how do you explain the same alignment creating a wide range of ticks as in my picture. The person must select one from many because the system fails to produce just one shot line.

I would say thats why it works for you.:smile:

Offset or not you've created different angles with your same line up. ..thats an issue. How many shots go with the same line up in the picture I presented?

Proper context. You're either starting off with alignment that is not a true A ..or you're adjusting after the alignment to suit your need to pocket the ball. One alignment should produce one constant shot line. Focus and movement is adjusting. You're not gaining anything when you're...

So your not actually aligning at A with the edge of the cb at the ob on all the shots? From the start.

Nope ..and then you reply with yes Im adjusting picking up the lines. The A is only in one place Scarlett.

So you're adjusting after your alignment...yes or no.

Are you adjusting as your creating more of a cut??

Are you kidding?? post you line ups...I'll give you the question.

Yep....I was hoping they would give me the lines ups for the picture I presented. I had a couple questions for them...silence...:confused: You get the feeling their affraid of the truth.

Hals system was nothing like pro1..nothing. Hal basically told me the shot boils down to a thick or thin cte manual pivot..that's it. It does make some shots...but not all without some tweaking.

Same here...but you did come with some subconscious thing happening with pro1 which is a start towards the truth of whats being done for success. Not to many others will admit to that.

What would I have a issue with??

Yep..I can see that.

Yes you was wrong...you ever appoligize to anyone for it??? Yep ...we shit your way to...and I appoligize for that but we're just trying to sort through the trouble for a solution. btw ..what are the perceptions for the shots now?

As far as we can tell...you're probably Stan.:smile:

Got money says you and any of your user are just barking shit.. wanna gamble on the curtian..come see me.

I"ll let you know where this issue is....post your line ups on the picture I presented. You do realise people were claiming that the system connects to the pocket ...even when being covered by a curtian.

When you place your edge of the cueball to the ob...this creates the cte line right?? cte has a double check meaning what?

I think the edge of the cb would be more objective wouldnt it...I mean ...the edge is the the start of the visual right....then the cte line..or does it matter? Also is the cte line not always in the same place on the cb?