Search results

Thx! It'll turn you into a banker's son. It does very with banking, particularly the one railers. Stan Shuffett

An issue with pivot amounts is tip size. There are large tips and small tips. The visual version circumvents tip diameters and bridge distances. Stan Shuffett

Tom's version was the cue skewering version. This is essentially the same version but visual skewering instead. Stan Shuffett

Link has been exchanged. Should work now. Stan Shuffett

https://youtu.be/Uar8s9kbqdI Part 1...... Stan Shuffett

Thanks, Randy and bbb! Stan Shuffett

Here's the rub.....all fractional systems have gaps, including yours, and those in the know are well versed in that but will not speak up here. AtLarge is the exception to the rule. Although, there a strong degree of accuracy to what you present, there are still fine feel adjustments that are...

Fractional system are amateur oriented. You say that yourself. It's no secret. Fractional systems are choc-ful of gaps. Having said that, I think that fractional systems are great for many league players, especially the 5 line system on a bar table. Stan Shuffett

Oh, you are wanting to open up another can of worms. Well, I dont mind giving out the info for the shot. My goal is to give out real info here, if possible, info that's not all that common and easy to come by. Popping the ball is another word for pinning the Cb. On that shot I did three...

There is no absolute visual reference for the quarter lines location for the quarters system. The quarter line represents a 14.5 angle meaning that if a Cb OB relation should be at that angle the OB will be aimed up center pocket with a 14.5 3/4 ball alignment. If it's not dead as if in slightly...

Lou, Denwhit blatantly bashed my video lesson on purpose right out of the gate just to prop up another system....and knock me down a little. The reason that I catch a little slack, I reckon, is because the moderators recognize what is taking place. Stan Shuffett Didn't take the haters long...

Thanks! I don't think what I presented is archaic by any stretch. There's lots of value for that system as an amateur system. I prefer the simplicity of it if I were teaching fractions to a student. Stan Shuffett

Yes, I have the book. The numbers are not WILD guesses. Keep your negative ass out of this thread, you fricken bashing piece of crap. There will be those that appreciate the info. Stan Shuffett

https://youtu.be/EJwNqLnEwgE Stan Shuffett

CTE is simple but there is a learning curve. It's not an overnight deal. A person has to decide what they want. It's odd and different at first. Simplicity and comfortableness is often an indicator that it's wrong, too. That's why most aiming systems can be learned overnight....EASY STUFF...

It's so simple that you'd get it immediately but the technique does occur subsequently to seeing a perception. The directions after that are precise. I wouldn't bet a million against the electric chair that my wife would get it..........CTE is an advanced visual system after all but I'm not...

CTE is visual. Manual is nothing more than a means to an end. Manual pivoting is more about visual learning than the actual act of pivoting. The sweep is a different deal but uses the same CCB. My stop sign for all this has been tough to see. It's challenging when trying to put things together...

Determining thick or thin is a very very very simple visual task. I will leave it at that for now. I promise you precision instruction for that in my online videos. The concept and how to it is ridiculously easy. Average ability is not a requirement. Stan Shuffett

There's no fudging on thick or thin via the perception and no adjustment to the CCB that makes the shot. Stan Shuffett