Search results

CTE PRO ONE There's only 3 or 4 shots. There are defined perceptions for each shot with known CCBs. I played the ghost a race 7 on my 10 footer a good while back. 95% of my shots were 15s and 30s. I put that video up on Vimeo. Anyway, it's nice to primarily play 2/3 perceptions all the time...

I'd like to see Lou's PRS detailed out as well. He knows what's he doing. I'd say it is close to text book but not sure. Anyway, hopefully he'll share it. Not too much to ask. Stan Shuffett

It's more like an offset beside the balls like you do. Techically, you are doing a form of pivoting. No argument about PSR. Within the context of PSR a player can expend varying amounts of focus at his discretion to specific things along the way from top to the shot. Again, my comment is...

Technically, Yes. But the implication was for standing behind the balls. There's a lot difference between the visual work that occurs while standing vs down on the shot. It's at the closest scource to the shot where perfection really matters. So, no need to waste focus up top only to have to...

You qualified your comment about perception with PSR. I equate PSR mostly with standing at ball address. Stan Shuffett

NOT a necessary step for CTE. Stan Shuffett

Hell, I might just mention you in my book! Mosconi never won against those players! Stan Shuffett

The mental sense or awareness for any perception in CTE has definition and absolute description. Stan Shuffett

I am concerned about one aiming system and one only. You don't know it and he does not know it either. How in the hell can someone dispell something that is NOT known. What your man or you should do is go to YouTube and do your thing for everyone to see. How in the heck can he tear down CTE...

You keep knocking me! Just off the top of my head my students have gone on to win: 2 USA Jr. Nationals 4 USA JR Nationals NYC Champion 2 State Champions about 10 World Junior Champion 1 Steve Mizeraz 1 Seminole Pro Tour 2 European GB 9 Tour 2 Women's WPBA 1 Collegiate titles 2 3 USA Men's...

Not sure why you think that 1 pocket is the best game for aiming issues. 1 pocket is a lot about the cue ball. 14.1, the same thing. Rotation and bank are the better games when pure aiming is at a premium. Stan Shuffett

Poolology is an approximation system. That's just a plain simple fact. No bash! If you can't handle that then so be it! Stan Shuffett

When you look around and don't know who the sucker is in the game reminds me of you., Everybidy here understands your gaps but you. The sad part about it that a couple of them have played you like fiddle. Stan Shuffett

You are smart enough to say JUST MAYBE. Stan Shuffett

I accept that you can't grasp the concept. I will promise you this: If CTE had the same gaps as POOLOLOGY I'd been toast a long time ago. Stan Shuffett

Several times you stated here-no feel and no adjustment. If you are using the whole pocket as slop then you are good to go...... AtLarge and a host of others understand the difference. Some are dead on and some are really close does not work. I'm done! It's a stupid argument. Stan Shuffett

I don't need the likes of him or you either. What's the old saying, Go jump in a lake, swallow a snake and come out with a bellyache! Stan Shuffett

The whole of the billiard fraternity uses approximation systems. Great! Fractions work but there is an inherent adjustment for many of the base alignments.....some are on some are off. Go for it! Brian but do not falsely mislabel your work as no feel no adjustment for your CCB base alignments...

Right on with some and close with others won't cut the mustard! That is a description of an approximation system. Stan Shuffett

Stun is the worst violator of all for CIT. As I said, I rarely adjust for sliding balls but there are exceptions to the rule. Stan Shuffett