Search results

  1. Patrick Johnson

    Aiming B.S.

    You apparently make that work pretty well. Those who can visualize a parallel line might do it a little more easily (without micro-adjustments). pj chgo
  2. Patrick Johnson

    Aiming B.S.

    Yes, I believe that's the one Mensabum is referring to - again clearly showing that it doesn't work as described. If you hit the object ball with the CB's contact point indicated by the dashed line from CB to pocket, the object ball's path will be parallel to that line (i.e., will hit the end...
  3. Patrick Johnson

    Aiming B.S.

    Here's a diagram showing why the lines through the CB and OB must be parallel in order for their contact points to connect. The black lines are the object ball and its path to the pocket. The red lines on the left are the cue ball and its path to the pocket. The red lines on the right show...
  4. Patrick Johnson

    Aiming B.S.

    That’s only half of it. The other half of what he's saying is to find the spot on the cue ball that’s closest to the pocket and connect the two points - but they’re impossible to connect because the lines aren't parallel. pj chgo
  5. Patrick Johnson

    Aiming B.S.

    Except those points can’t connect - it’s physically impossible. It’s only possible when the two lines are parallel - that’s why the correct version is called “parallel lines aiming”. pj chgo
  6. Patrick Johnson

    Balance point and deflection

    Yes, because a smaller tip would have less "end mass" in the first several inches near the tip, so produces less deflection. They reduce (not eliminate) deflection by reducing "end mass" by boring a hole in the shaft for the first several inches at the tip - they even have a patent on the hole...
  7. Patrick Johnson

    Last ball syndrome

    The excellent book Pleasures of Small Motions emphasizes this point. Focus on the process (stance/shot), not on the outcome (game/match). pj chgo
  8. Patrick Johnson

    Balance point and deflection

    Why not? pj chgo
  9. Patrick Johnson

    Latest Nemesis Shot

    About a half ball hit, so pretty much maximum throw. Do you tend to hit it fat? pj chgo
  10. Patrick Johnson

    Tip life

    That's where Tip Piks show their value: quick and effective roughing without removing leather or changing shape. pj chgo
  11. Patrick Johnson

    Funny pic/gif thread...

    Is that R2D2 driving it?
  12. Patrick Johnson

    Carbon Fiber vs Maple - Density and Squirt

    Thanks for the info. FYI, with those dimensions*, the CF walls occupy about 31% of the total 12mm shaft's cross section area. pj chgo *(Assuming "outer radius 6mm" means overall diameter = 12mm.)
  13. Patrick Johnson

    Tip life

    Do you keep it shaped (not too flat)? pj chgo
  14. Patrick Johnson

    Balance point and deflection

    It's also the point on your shaft/cue that's directly over the centerball aim line when angled (pivoted around that point) correctly for the shot's squirt. The distance from the tip to the pivot point is the cue's pivot length. The amount of squirt produced (ignoring swerve) is equal to the...
  15. Patrick Johnson

    Carbon Fiber vs Maple - Density and Squirt

    If that measures stiffness, I don't think it matters much for a squirt comparison - squirt is generated primarily by end mass, not stiffness. pj chgo
  16. Patrick Johnson

    Aiming B.S.

    Or at least its triangles are... pj chgo
  17. Patrick Johnson

    Aiming B.S.

    FYI, every triangle’s interior angles total 180 degrees. pj chgo
  18. Patrick Johnson

    Balance point and deflection

    Easy to see how it seems true (lots of players believe it), but larger doesn’t actually help. Flatter can be a tiny bit more forgiving... pj chgo
  19. Patrick Johnson

    Latest Nemesis Shot

    The bases of balls (where they touch the table) are clearly visible indicators of center ball that can be helpful visual aids for aiming. I don't know any particular methods, but I think it's come up here a time or two. pj chgo
  20. Patrick Johnson

    Balance point and deflection

    [broken record alert] For a given tip offset, the amount of squirt produced by a shaft is a fixed angle from the cue's direction - changing the cue's direction doesn't change that fixed angle (the "amount of deflection"), only the direction it's pointed. Sorry to be so insistent, but I think...
Back
Top