Search results

they're trying to support the inclusion of cuesports every olympics? doesn't mean it gets included, it's lobbying

they seem to learn very slowly. it's better than when they had the world championship 15 years ago... but not much better. the chat i don't care too much about, but when the pauses are as long as the matches in a continuous live stream that's just not good. and if they can have this prize...

jayson v moritz on now. one english (pepsi) and one arabic commentator in the booth. it's so bad it makes me miss the vietnamese language on boxbilliards

myea, the bottom line is showing in that field strength chart. those are the top 3 highest paying events, it's as simple as that

"with the naked eye"? can you post a video example example of such a miscue in a match? the double hits in a miscue are almost always happening so fast in succession they can't be spotted. and again, read the WPA rules about intention in these situations, or tell them that intention has zero to...

* broadcasting. different kettle of fish, and not necessarily MR's fault. possible the broadcaster assumed less interest when pinoy players were out after the QF

almost home turf. difficult draw for shane. well, for ruslan too, but i figure him to beat ruslan

was ameer ali in the final last year?

read OP rules link again: Under the current rules (see WPA WSR 6.16c), a miscue is a foul only if it is intentional. i have no doubt that marcel is right that cue hit cb multiple times, it was technically a foul, but an intention provision should overrule that

i think intention is the word here. never in a million years will you see a pro player trying to scoop jump onto a ball that's not obstructed. intentional scoop miscues is something you see party bangers do in your local pool room. therefore, bad call

supporting legs is a great feature though. i would keep them

yea. so many favorites with george, but the way he says "walking" here gets me every time:

seriously doubt that. it's tapered thicker and has a bigger ferrule/tip diameter

it was single elim

it probably did hit more than once but that doesn't matter imo, as it wasn't intentional. two things can be true at the same time: it can technically be a foul AND still be legal because in the spirit of the game unintentional miscues are tolerated. if there will ever, against all probability...

good player but it's gonna take years re-build integrity and trust, especially living in the internet age

totally agree

i think the point was his original line was incorrect