Search results

I personally do not subscribe to this line of thought. A throw effect is due to some latent momentum being transfer to OB. It will be minimal unless CB is a lot heavier than OB. The spin on the cue ball will create a counter spin on the object but again very minimal unless the two balls have...

Hi Jeff, Maybe I got the wrong person, but I thought I sent you my Precision Potting Manual earlier. If you have read it and tried it out, then you can't say that you won't be as accurate with soft spin. You can.

PM me your email address and I will send it to you. Free of Charge. Alternatively, you can email to me at precisionpotting@gmail.com.

Hi Jeff, Isn't a foot or so, too far for a test of accuracy. I fancy it should be a few millimeter. If side-spin is used, then care must be taken to make sure it still hits the half ball aimed marking (I believe you have the PP manual, so maybe it can help in hitting the right spot for...

I am not exactly a novice and I tend to win most of my games these days. My manual is more on understanding the physics of the game.and on how to use it to your benefit. If you have read my manual, then you probably would be surprised at a few things in it. For amateurs or above average...

Hi Jeff, I am stunned by your reply. I do believe that throw has a certain minimal effect but by a whole 23 degrees for a half -ball aim, that is astonishing (or rather shocking). May I know how the test is done and how sure are you that you are hitting the exact spot on the half-ball aim...

Thanks a million BC21. This diagram gave me a brainwave on how to complete the Precision Potting Aiming System. I will write the manual in due time.

Nope, not selling. Giving away for free. Not instruction, just a new playing style that is primarily to do with side-spin.

Thanks Poolplaya9. For point 1, if the ball is disturbed, won't it be ball in hand and the disturbed ball remain where it finally ended up and not respotted back to its original location?

It has been enlightening. Thanks guys for taking the time to type in your detailed explanation. Very much appreciated. Still has question over point 1 and 2. 1. What does it meant by disturbing the ball? In a game of pool, all balls have the possibility of being disturbed. You meant if...

Hi LAMas, Give me your email and I send you the manual. Then you know that all these have been worked out in the siimplest form.

Some of the issues that bugs me when watching pool games are: 1. Whenever I watch the Filipino players play in their pool halls, they will be surrounded by bystanders. Once a while, one of the "bystander" will come up and mark something on the table below the cue ball and the object ball in...

I have an indepth study into it, in the Precision Potting Manual which is by the way, FOC. Actually, if you move your bridge closer to the CB (shorter bridge length), you get a smaller deflection as opposed to moving away from the CB (longer bridge length). So, Precision Potting Aiming System...

I have always thought that the call pocket rule was in place until some professional players did not call obvious pocket and were penalized. Thereafter, the rules in important tournaments were changed such that it is not necessary to call pockets for obvious shots. What GB Basher is implying...

Exactly. That is why Precision Potting Aiming System focuses on these two aiming points. No shifting to aim somewhere else. Just aim at either of these points and fire away.

I physically change the bridge length by moving my bridge (closer or further from the cue ball) relative to a sweet spot, pivot and apply the BHE. The last aim just before pivot is still center to center. This is what I meant by precise aiming. How precise can you get than aiming center to center.

What I am trying to say is: I aimed straight on even though it is a 10 degree shot. I moved my bridge length without changing the aim. I play a side-spin and the cue ball strikes the object at a 9 to 11 degree angle making the long pot. No adjustment in the aiming point at all.

Free manual. You just need to give me your email address. Cheers.

I believe we are getting off track here. We can argue till the cow comes home. Let's believe that the other is correct. What you guys are talking are perception point/s to aim at. I am advocating two points. Straight on and total miss as two main aiming point. Is it different from all...

Can I safely said that this is a new aiming system, since the aiming is done primarily by changing the bridge length and not by focusing on any 'arbitrary point' on the object ball.