Search results

The great players know far far more about the game than they can ever convey to a pupil regardless of whether they are natural teachers or not. Their brains are different and that's a large part of why they accomplish(ed) what they do/have in the game. But the tidbits and anecdotal comments of...

Content creator is an excellent label for Dr Dave. (y)

terrific photography OP

So much easier and wiser to trust folks like Darren Appleton or Neils Fiejen for knowledgable instruction than some guy named Dr Dave. Just is what it is. Not to say that lesser players can't teach but all things being equal how on earth can Dr Dave know a thing if he's never competed at a high...

plus, we can't start talking about "mights"

I think Fedor has a solid edge playing banks for what that’s worth. I’d take Josh playing straight pool for any amount you can count though. Rotation games, who cares.

Them algorithms are just too damn smart

Don’t think this is coming across how you’re intending it, unless of course that intention is to be a pompous douchebag in that case you’re nailing it! Harsh but

An in-house league that I used to play in had all ball fouls for a couple of seasons. It was an absolute shit show all the arguments it created. Last thing anyone wants to do on league night is argue about whether or not their hair or shirt touched a ball out in space. Simply cannot be done...

Will watch the video later but hard pass for me. Arguing over whether my shirt touched a ball or not doesn’t sound like a good time and leagues are about fun. Without referees, just forget all ball fouls imo.

Yeah that idea of fast forwarding players based on the past or perceived skill or reputation or frankly any other reason is among the very worst ideas I’ve ever heard.

you can now do this from through digital pool. Just check in on the "iPad" following the prompts. My opponent in round 3 of the banks got put on the clock and sure enough showed up with less than a minute left.

Just happy to see some people talking about the REAL issue about tournament pacing.... The 9 ball event.

The rules will not decide the victor of matches only will they somewhat occasionally alter the strategy used within those matches. Same players are going to win just because they’re the best players and that’s what they do. Filler Gorst SVB Alex Lunda Gomez Chohan Maybe Robert’s, Billy...

I'm not sure why additional rules are necessary considering the 4 hour max for matches. If we are going to make some crazy rules I have a real humdinger to propose. 45 min PER GAME max. Get up 5-0 and shove them up table wedge em, whatever it's all part of the game but that game ends at 45...

pockets appear to be made similar to Gabriels and Clash pool tables. interesting. I wonder if they hold a dozen balls like those?

Hitting the head ball wouldn’t solve the “dead ball(s)” issue though. Random 1 and 10 would at least make it near impossible to play position on the 1 though.

Might be a radical idea(and a terrible one too but just for fun) let’s put the 1 ball in the second row and make them hit it first lol

whatever size they measure is irrelevant. They play so big it’s like there’s more pocket than rail. Worthless to watch imo but to each their own. Might be fun on worn cloth with just normal pro cut pockets.

End of the day any game is going to be “too easy” when the very best at it start with a reasonable shot. So what exactly is the point of saying it’s too easy? They all are. Great players play offense with extreme efficiency, shocked face emoji! Haha People want less break and runs then rules...