Search results

It wouldn't be a stretch to think they somehow settled (after the fact of course). :ROFLMAO:

Besides foul, I'd say the way to shoot that is into the right tit. I have explained debatable hits to the bar rules crowd by calling the OB direction - an element most of them get. Know your buckets.

Might be a humor test. Worth a ball in some circles. :LOL:

That would be French and probably only in France. Maybe Canada...

I use Klepto chalk exclusively.

SIT and CIT are how the instructors have it broken down. Saves keystrokes for one. Case in point:

The shape is mathematically optimized for minimal production waste while still curbing static ownership.

That would be SIT and plain misaligned strokes.

Lotta times it's some banal fundamental thing holding up the show. I suspect most just wait for the improvements to unfold. Not likely to happen.

Well then refs should have sweat sense. What's more disruptive, intervening or unresolvable conflict?

Sigel or somebody commented that he had run (prolly strung) 8 racks on the warmup table. I'd say he wore it out before they even started.

The regulation balls are tinier than American snooker balls. Why is that?

I like pool. It might be the marksmanship. Any difficulties I encounter get absorbed into doing pool. Swatting at a lone ball is next level harder.

That one is pretty obvious. Even I noticed.

Just call split then whomever's available can watch the hit. Not calling split will be a foul.

This is every bit OnT. People gotta come in and manhndle the thing. Elegantly of course.

It's a precursor to the time machines they can't sell.

Or lose your place.

Lol, his game? Nice shots you got there. The cheesy one too. That Varner shot looks like you walked in on a porn set. :ROFLMAO:

How did RO do on this visit?