Search results

29% B&R on all breaks does not sound like a "break fest" as some would call it.

You forgot to end with "Thank you Miss Emily, please give me a chance to ref a major tournament, it's was always my dream." 😆

Great! Thank you. Glad that I asked because I wasn't aware that Dr. Dave was summarizing your stats. Thanks for your efforts on these stats!

I think the B&R average for professional 9 ball tournaments is about 30%. Do you have similar stats for professional 8 ball tournaments on 9 footers and 7 footers?

100% accurate statement ... OK, not sure about the "Even if part" 😆 Physics would not allow for that type of movement unless the 9 ball was in a trench. Let's get Dr. Dave to replicate that "foul" but be prepared to donate generously because he might not be able to do it in a lifetime. Besides...

Acceptable, but you have to understand that you are one of the most respected voice on this forum and you called it a foul, without apparently reading all the arguments that it wasn't. You should have evaluated everything before rushing to judgement. If the purpose of this thread is to put an...

Maybe he couldn't see with his glasses lol 😆 He was in the perfect position, by the way for those position pundits.

People will see and believe whatever suits them. I posted a video above where the 8 ball seems to move (post 171), but no comments so far. Well if it's not a conspiracy it's certainly a controversy being raised here. Too bad.

Not sure why you are saying they weren't fouls BEFORE. You have to provide incidents where Marcel and the female referee (forgot her name) passed on similar "fouls" before the rule change and these incidents occurring. If other referees didn't call it, then they were wrong not Marcel and the...

Like it or not referees have to operate with what the rules are at the time. It is obvious that those two incidents shown were unintentional miscues, but they were scoops. I would say it's a good rule change, but the calls at the time were not incorrect. How about, Chang Jung Lin losing...

I believe you are talking about the miscue where the cue ball jumped over the OB. Not sure if there was any determination that his call was incorrect. Scooping the cue ball is a foul, whether intentional or error. Would be happy to read the rule change on that if you have it.

Because there was none. You are a reputable and knowledgeable person, don't feed the conspiracy here.

Then who is? His "high profile screwups" are all with Americans involved ... JJ, oh he should have told him the clock was running. SVB, oh the great Doctor RECREATED a video where he developed scenarios that proved the call was wrong, even though Dr. Dave did not make any conclusion of his own...

Guess you are questioning Marcel, the best (not arguably) referee in the sport. You were there, where was he standing that makes his position incorrect? It's not seen in the video.

No, the reason for the thread was to discredit Yapp, read the title.

Oh crap people still wasting time on this shit thread. Look at the 8 ball on time stamp 1:06:55 in the video below:

Aren't you the one that was looking for micro movements using slow motion 😆 Don't feel bad USA is always the best and correct. USA USA

1. The balls were not close. 2. Look at the circle on the 9, it never moved. 3. Only upward movement of the cue stick. 4. Optical illusion from camera angle and shadow. However, if this make you feel better USA, USA, USA

You mean the SVB shit. Only Americans coming up with these conspiracy shit.

Now you are a confirmed joker. I'll let it rest.