Search results

Thank you, I see now there are two ways to look at each example I presented, thanks for the information to take my concerns to. I will be doing a lot of trolling in my fishing boat this summer.

In regards to the sandbagging definition, thank you, but how would one go about doing that. In regards to your other comments and opinions your way of base. Win/lose is part of the game any game. Can't be a good winner without being a humble loser. Not accusing anyone of anything at this...

Sure, lets start with your name and how to get a hold of you outside this forum. Player A - Skill level 4- Session 1 has a 2.2 points per match average Next Session has a 2.3 point per match average wins MVP. I personally saw him beat a sl7 during this session. How does Player 3 not go up...

Can you clarify your definition of a sandbagger for me??? I would agree with you that losing a match here and there wouldn't lower your skill level as the system from my understanding is designed as you said the best 10 of your last 20 which make it harder for you to drop a skill level...

Could it also be LO have a vested interest in maintaining their leagues, divisions, teams, and because of the 23 point cap, they also manage the skill levels for certain teams, yes I'd say that is a great tool to have. You mentioned earlier that LO can raise you up a skill level before the...

Thank you, that does make sense, what is still perplexing to me is if a formula or algorithm if equally applied across every player there would be more skill level movement across the board not just the same people session after session.

These situations will have very limited impact in most cases. It can on occasions increase you by a skill level. It is a manual process to input the data in the system, so human error is a factor, in which you should question certain things when they happen, and mostly likely it will be reversed.

Even if defensive shots were not marked, and a player has a high inning count for a match won, would not the Applied Score chart come into play and the lower number be used.

So if I understand this correctly, the LO can set the lowest attainable sl say for a sl5 to zero and that player can be manually lowered to a sl4 any time. Reason I'm asking is I don't know how anyone with 80% winning record in week 8 goes down a skill level. Can you enlighten me on this...

If he is losing 60% of those matches then he could stay a 6. The other factor would be the sl he is playing against. This is why I asked his winning %.

I play in 4 different geographical leagues and there is a very wide winning percentage range 90, 55. 38, 28. Also have to factor in what sl I play against.

What is your winning percentage

You make two very good points here. Player A may be a 4 as he plays in a stronger league that doesn't mark safeties. Player B might be a over rated new 6 as he plays in a weak league that always mark safeties. These two players meet in a match you now factor in the handicap system Player A...

I've heard that also even a lower inning average than that, there is a chart on this.

I've heard that also