Search results

I haven't been on the forums in a Loooong time. Glad to see that CTE still supplies fodder for discussion, and that you still provide measured doses of reality for those who will listen. How's Stan doing? Book published? Documentary produced? Just curious. Cheers! - s.west edit: Dang! I...

Which he assured the naysayers he would provide to settle the question and put them in their place. But, no? - s.west -- color me "unsurprised"

Thanks. I probably won't stick around for too long. My personal situation has changed in recent years, and priorities have shifted, somewhat. I'm still s'posed to be on Joel H's list, so if my name ever comes up, and I decide to visit him in person (in the environs of the Windy City), I'd like...

Apart from the ones already posed, no, none. Cheers, - s.west

p.s. Have I missed Stan's semiannual meltdown and self-exile?

Holy Cow! PJ's back! I haven't logged in to the forums in quite a while. In truth, it just wasn't that interesting any more. But, then, 3:00 a.m. rolled around, I woke up and couldn't go back to sleep. So I figured, "What the hell? Let's log in and see what they're arguing about." And...

Thanks, Dan for some sound reasoning.

I suppose that's one way to put it.

I always love when you cite this axiomatic gem of, what you must apprehend to be, self-evident wisdom... It's your old "CTE was never supposed to be" chestnut. Perhaps, on this occasion, you will take a moment to elucidate what in the world that's even supposed to mean. ? If "CTE does...

I know this thread is ancient, but I just ran across this piece from the SLC Tribune. Great picture and short article.

You have legitimate questions. History (of this subject) has taught us that if one persists in asking such questions, then the "getting upset" outcome is the only one possible. Rest assured that you are in good company. It would appear that CTE is a journey, and not a destination. Good luck...

No. I indicated that a satisfactory explanation will not be given. Big difference... Just setting the record straight. - s.west

Why are you talking to me?

(you probably don't want me on your 'side', and I wouldn't want you to think I was trolling you, but just in case you missed my earlier post... with new emphasis added...) You are absolutely correct... and, You will never, ever, get a satisfactory explanation that includes what you already...

You are absolutely correct... and, You will never, ever, get a satisfactory explanation that includes what you already know must be true. - s.west

I google-mapped Rio Rancho, and then google-earthed it... Wow! It would appear that they have laid out the entire, and very large, city over there... There are pieces filled in, here and there, but a lot of it looks like pre-graded roads and subdivisions... Looks almost like the Nazca...

Reviving this thread. I'm going to be in Albuquerque next week on business, but I will have a couple of nights free to shoot some pool. Recommendations? I saw the posts for Doc & Eddy's, and when I went to look up more information (on the Information Super Highway), I discovered that they are...

Before it gets lost in the crap, let's clarify something - The Prime Referent for: What a maroon! would be Bugs Bunny... not Smorg. just sayin'

Apart from the mudslinging, this is just a debate over semantics. It seems to me that what rrick33 is asserting about Lou's (or anyone's) aiming is just a facet of, some variation of, the Theory of Learning. So, yes, one could say that Lou learned to aim via some system of learning. However...

Thanks for that. It is an instructive read (although I'm only a fraction of the way through it...)