Search results

I stopped answering maha's posts since I saw his first two posts in this thread, go back look them up and you'll get it....dont' argue with the man, i'ts no good. EDIT: Oopsie not this thread though, it was on my thread which started before this thread and was the first one about this subject...

You're dead wrong, I think.

Its his second major tournament win on a foul, why do you want to take this lightly? I don't understand...this is an absolute chaos for the pool world, literally speaking, had this happened in football or basketball, then courts would be involved.

Never, cause I don't ever own an expensive chalk :D Why would I buy an expensive chalk when the best chalk in the world costs $2 for a whole 12 chalk box! Thats right, 1 dozen of chalks I bought them for $1.99 from seyberts. Sadly these chalks are removed from seyberts I think. They are called...

I'll answer this, they usually squint their eyes & bend their knees to come closer to the balls in order to see which one was hit first!!!!!!!!!! which is absolutely lunatic, ludicrous, and laughably stupid. All you need is to look for what the cueball is doing next; that's all you want to...

They don't understand pool or billiards at all, let them come close to the balls & squint their eyes into the two object balls to determine fouls, even more funnier let them play slow-mo of the shots to see which ball moved first which is hilarious. I laugh so hard whenever I see live-match...

Listen I don't understand anything you said, but it was a foul 1000% - maybe you're trying to justify something there but I got no clue what you were saying.

A path of the cueball & The reaction of a cueball, one of the two can tell the whole story, I am sorry....it can 100% tell the whole story. A simultaneous hit is a rare, very rare actually....let me say it again vvvvvvvvery rare, and if that happens I also can tell you that it might of happened...

Yes Ronnie would have called it on himself, and I think I would have called it on myself also. I would have been much happier if Yapp called it on himself but he didn't....I mean look at his face again as the 8ball went down, he couldn't even breathe he knew its a foul. This is the 2nd time...

This is exactly what I've been saying, no need to eye-ball it with your eyes I dont know why ref's do this. it is amazing to me when they do this, especially that one clown ref I always forget his name, he comes very close and squints his eyes, its hilarious. All you need is to understand the...

hahahahaha, I don't know what you smoked before writing this....please lmao

simultaneous is very rough and kind of impossible but lets entertain it, if you hit both balls at the same exact time - then if you got draw on the cueball then it would draw in between both balls going backward, and if you have follow then it would go tangent in between both balls exactly...

i'm sorry,,,,, sooooooooooooooorrrrrrrry - again I love yapp, but there's aboslutely noway a good player wouldnt KNOW that this is a foul, he knows it, he knew it then, look at his face. but again he's going I think by the books - where people tend to say "Just go by what the ref says" maybe...

Words of wisdom, like you're speaking with my tongue. I know for fact that you got billiard knowledge and been in the game for many many years.

you think its possible to hit the 8ball first, then the purple ball, then the cueball goes into the direction it went to? it went to the same direction as a 8ball not just that, but even to the left of 8ball slightly the opposite side of that purple ball, try following a shot with any english...

I made a threat about his first one here, https://forums.azbilliards.com/threads/yapp-winning-with-a-foul-just-like-maradona-making-a-goal-with-his-hands-d.579054/ But now he won again with a foul in the final rack. I don't know whats up with Yapp and winning the final rack on a foul, however...

Anything that Bill Stroud makes with his hands is just gold. I didn't shoot with this, of course, but I expect this to shoot rather beautifully.

you kinda missed my point entirely

I agree with this, in fact, the tighter the pocket is, the more luck-based the game becomes. I've had a long discussion a very long time ago about this, people mostly didn't agree but I still believe it. At a pro high-end level, the tighter pocket will give more leverage for the weaker pro...

I was thinking about this SST cuetec shaft and the story again, I really enjoyed it but I gave it another thought. I think during the videos I posted which was in 1990 and 1991, at that time I don't think there was an SST Shaft. If I remember correctly these shafts came out much later maybe...