One of the most amazing things (imo) ever done in pool was Earl Strickland's feat of running 10 racks in a row at a tournament for 1 million dollars.....
Although some say it wasn't that big a deal because, during the run, he made quite a few 9 balls on the snap...well, I still say it was amazing....My question to any or all out there in the pool world is...did Earl get the million after all? I heard that the insurance company was trying to escape having to pay on certain technicalities? This was similar to the idea of a stipulated hole-in-one in golf for bonus money, or a 300 game in bowling on a TV match, but I'm not sure where each of these would rank on the "degree of difficulty" issue.
Although some say it wasn't that big a deal because, during the run, he made quite a few 9 balls on the snap...well, I still say it was amazing....My question to any or all out there in the pool world is...did Earl get the million after all? I heard that the insurance company was trying to escape having to pay on certain technicalities? This was similar to the idea of a stipulated hole-in-one in golf for bonus money, or a 300 game in bowling on a TV match, but I'm not sure where each of these would rank on the "degree of difficulty" issue.