Aiming Systems...my take !!!

Neil said:
Dick, I think you are missing the point. Going just by your theory, why should anyone come to you for lesons? They can learn it on their own anyways.

What I feel some of you are missing is- no one is claiming that pocketing balls using an aiming system will make you a shortstop or better. Why don't they say this? Because, as others mentioned, aiming is only a part of the equation to being a good or great player.

You first have to have a repeatable stroke. Then you have to know how to aim. Then you have to know where the cb is going. Then you have to learn the right speed. Then you have to learn where to make the cb go. Then you have to learn safety play. And on and on.

Aiming systems can and do make aiming easier for many. That just means that they can now pocket the ball. That is only step two in the equation of many steps. Who that has been around for a while hasn't
seen great shotmakers that couldn't beat hardly anyone because they didn't know how to play the game? I've seen dozens of them myself.

What you are going to be teaching is not aiming, it's steps much farther up in the equation. Steps that are necessary to be good or great, but still just another step. What you propose to do is knock years off someones learning curve by teaching the right or easier steps than just taking years to learn on their own. Aiming sytems are the same thing. They help take years off the learning curve to one of the steps.

As far as the systems go- taking two students that haven't played, and giving one a system and the other none, well, unless they can both stroke straight, you really aren't testing anything. If you can't stroke straight, you can have a foolproof method of aiming that doesn't mean squat. You have to be able to put the cb where you want it to go first.

Very few ever become great in this game of ours because their are so many variables to it. Their are world class shotmakers that aren't shorstops. Their are world class safety players that can't run a couple of racks in a row. Their are world class players that just can't get it all together at the same time and take forever on a shot.

One could easily name twenty things that you have to do in a few seconds to be great at this game. If any one of those variables are missing, you get to take a chair until your next turn. Aiming is only one of those things. I have seen many people that can do certain parts way better than the top pros. But there are other things that they just can't get a grasp on that keep them from ever becoming a 'player', let alone great.

There's a reason why pool is one of the very hardest sports to become really good in. And aiming is only a small part of it. A very necessary part, but just a part.

Neil,

Thanks for responding on my credentials as an instructor. I do not teach basic pool principles. I only teach one pocket strategy. I lack the patience to teach "aiming systems" or how to hold a cue ! Hope that doesn't make me a bad guy in your eyes.

Dick
 
Da Bank said:
all I know is, I was taught the aiming system that CJ Wiley uses by Doug Smith after a 4 hour coaching session with him and my game has improved almost 2 balls in a month.

To claim that there are no aiming systems, when people teach and develop the systems is just not looking at reality... there are aiming systems. If you don't think they work, that's a different story and those arguments will be purely based on an individual basis.

When i'm in stroke and have a great feel for the table, I am very confident that I don't need to use the aiming system on 90% of my shots... and if my position play is right, I don't ever have to use an aiming system. When i start missing or come up to a shot that makes me pause... I go to the aiming system to give me an extra step of confidence.

Da Bank,

I don't mean this as a derogetory comment, but would you care to say what player level you are at. ? A,B,C, banger or ???? It's great that you have your aiming system to fall back on. What is your success ratio ? (assuming its not the last ball on the table.)

Dick
 
I had hoped to bring more of the "aiming system" guys into this discussion.
I am always butting into their threads with my neandrethal viewpoints.
I hope I haven't offended them, as I value the give and take on this subject.

Dick
 
Da Bank said:
all I know is, I was taught the aiming system that CJ Wiley uses by Doug Smith after a 4 hour coaching session with him and my game has improved almost 2 balls in a month.

To claim that there are no aiming systems, when people teach and develop the systems is just not looking at reality... there are aiming systems. If you don't think they work, that's a different story and those arguments will be purely based on an individual basis.

When i'm in stroke and have a great feel for the table, I am very confident that I don't need to use the aiming system on 90% of my shots... and if my position play is right, I don't ever have to use an aiming system. When i start missing or come up to a shot that makes me pause... I go to the aiming system to give me an extra step of confidence.


Hi, isn't cj wiley's method is also center to edge? Or is this different? I have watched his Ultimate Secrets in pool video and he discussed this.:)
 
SJDinPHX said:
JB Cases said:
I, for one, am glad to see top level players weighing in on the subject and WISH that they had done it much sooner. We have top level players here like you and Shawn Putnam, Danny Harriman, John Schmidt and Corey Harper, and others.

The thing is that you are aware that most people on this site want to be better players. So we try to find what works.

Instead of going over the validity, claims, counter-claims, and so on I just have some questions for you that only top players can answer.

1. When you aim how do you do it?

2. If you can remember back to when you began learning this game were you taught how to aim? If so what did they teach you? [QUOTE/]

JB and others,

I do not profess to have all the answers to what makes the difference between a great player and/or a great shotmaker. I myself, was only a fair shotmaker in my prime. I was merely trying to point out, how little relevence something called an "aiming system" really has on any game of pool.
My take is, NO ONE can teach a guy how to aim, anymore than you can teach Tiger Woods how much break to allow on a given putt.
Pool is NOT A MECHANICAL SCIENCE, and anyone who tries to convince me that it is, is wasting their breath. Yes you can help a novice to improve his game, just as you can teach your son to shoot a rifle.
You can show him how to hold the gun, and be steady, and to squeeze the trigger, but you CANNOT show him how to hit the tin can. That comes from a lot of misses, and a lot of frustration, UNLESS he's a natural at it.
I don't say these things to discourage people who want to learn the game we all love. I'm only trying to explain my thoughts on what it takes to become a
top notch player. And it doesn't begin with engineering principles. It begins with learning the basics and practicing those basics until you become the best player YOU can be.

Dick


Actually it does begin with engineering principles. In Sniper school they teach quite a lot about what a bullet does so that both the sniper and the spotter can understand it and internalize it. Once they have the basic science down then they move to perfecting the feel and method that works best for them.

What do you think the basics are predicated on?

I mean you don't just hand a guy a cue and say go practice for a hour. Do you?

You have to show them something to get them started, when you hit the ball like this it does that, when you stand like this you can do this.....

People have been discussing the physics behind billiards for 150 years or so.

I can't believe that there is a champion alive who hasn't THOUGHT about why things happen the way they do on a pool table.

You discount that there are "aiming systems" that pros use but a lot of us have verified that in fact a lot of your fellow top notchers are aiming with methods other than ghost ball/parallel english. So what are they doing?

Is is ALL just feel and experience?

Pool is mechanical science whether you admit it or not. It's also art. It's a blending of technology and physics and man's ability to take what's possible to it's limits and do it so well that it seems like magic.

Do you think that Captain Mignaud, the inventor of the leather tip, was particularly gifted? No, he just had a lot of free time with a billiard table and spent that time discovering a lot of the physics priniciples concerning billiards that you think come naturally.

No one is born knowing how to shoot a gun or hit a ball. They must be taught and the way they are taught is to explain the WHY and HOW of what it is that they should do. Then hopefully they have the capacity to take that information and process it to the point that they can do the thing they are learning.

Of course you can teach someone to aim. Are you kidding? If you take two absolute beginners and set up any simple shot and one of them gets a teacher/instruction and the other one gets nothing but a cue then I GUARANTEE you that the one with a teacher will be aiming and making the shot faster than the one without.

As for the relevance an "aiming system" has. For me it has brought my shot making to a new level. This has allowed me to spend a lot more time on my other problems like jumping up, poor stroking technique and so on. Wondering if I am on the right line is not an issue anymore. I can now make balls that make other people clap in awe.

We went through the whole nature/nurture thing and I can certainly agree that some people are much more coordinated than others. They may pick things up easier but you can take the world's greatest "talent" and put him up against people who are highly trained and he will lose.

How many of us have seen that "banger" in a bar who has FANTASTIC pocketing skill and absolutely NO cue ball control. That guy might be a future world champion except for the fact that he has no instruction and no seasoning. A C-player with an aiming system waxes this guy all day and night even if they both have about the same amount of "table time" in their lives.

I am not asking you for all the answers.

I am truly interested in your experiences. What forged you into a good player? Who taught you, what taught you, what kind of instruction were you given and by whom?

Us bangers can discuss and argue this stuff all day. What would really help is if the REAL top notchers on the board would chime in and tell us how they learned.
 
SJDinPHX said:
But the ones who subscribe to "aiming systems" will NOT get to teach my son or grandson.


Dick Mc Morran

PS At about 3 WPM typing speed, I trust you all realize how strongly I believe in my convictions. I am also not a "newbie" to pool. This comes from over 50 years of mud and blood in the trenches.


Dick,
Excellant post. The stupid computer program did not allow me to give you a green rep.By the way what do u think of my ' Red Neck Aiming system '? please ask me if u are not familiar with my 'Red Neck Aiming system':cool:
 
Last edited:
pooltchr said:
There are two things that can cause you to miss a shot. You can aim at the wrong place, or your cue ball delivery system (stroke) is flawed, and doesn't get the cue ball where you were aiming. If your aim is perfect, and your stroke is perfect, you should make the shot.
That being said, I think aiming accounts for more than 25%.

Steve

Sir, if you think there are only two things that can cause you to miss a shot....you are telling me that you have much to learn about pool. You may be a very qualified teacher of fundementals, but you have told me that your experience at high level competition is somewhat lacking. Aiming is a very small part of the game at its highest level. Any shortstop can fire balls in the hole. Pool at its highest level, exists mainly between the ears.

Dick
 
Last edited:
SJDinPHX said:
Sir, if you think there are only two things that can cause you to miss a shot....you are telling me that you have much to learn about pool. You may be a very qualified teacher of fundementals, but you have told me that your experience at high level competition is somewhat lacking. Aiming is a very small part of the game at its highest level. Any shortstop can fire balls in the hole. Pool at its highest level, exists mainly between the ears.

Dick
None of us have all the answers. And the more you post, the more convinced I become that it is you that has much to learn about this game. You have absolutely no good reason to be making judgments about this mans game, or his teaching abilities. If you don't agree with his post, that's acceptable. Be you don't have to be disrespectful. You speak about what it takes to play pool at its highest level. Have we seen you on ESPN, TAR or BCN?
 
JB Cases said:
SJDinPHX said:
JB Cases said:
I, for one, am glad to see top level players weighing in on the subject and WISH that they had done it much sooner. We have top level players here like you and Shawn Putnam, Danny Harriman, John Schmidt and Corey Harper, and others.

The thing is that you are aware that most people on this site want to be better players. So we try to find what works.

Instead of going over the validity, claims, counter-claims, and so on I just have some questions for you that only top players can answer.

1. When you aim how do you do it?

2. If you can remember back to when you began learning this game were you taught how to aim? If so what did they teach you? [QUOTE/]

JB, you make some very good points. I would prefer not to dwell on my accomplishments, but on those I've tried to emulate. I have been more fortunate than most, to have seen the best, at their best. My association with them has elevated my game over the years, to the point where I have a level of confidence that is (was) unshakable. Sure, I've missed balls I should have made, I've missed many game balls for the cash. That is not a sin, it better prepares you for the next time it comes up.
My whole point in this thread is not to discourage the beginner, but to try and point him in a more benificial direction.
Learn the basics. If you think aiming systems will help you, go for it! But I know from experience that there is no "magic bullet". Once you learn the basics of pool, you either have the drive and desire to excell, or you don't.
It ain't rocket science.(well maybe it seems like it) You will need a certain amount of hand/eye coordination, and a good dose of guts and competetive spirit to overcome the competition you will encounter.
Some have it some don't. But don't think its like learning how to dance, its much tougher than that.

Dick
 
Big C said:
None of us have all the answers. And the more you post, the more convinced I become that it is you that has much to learn about this game. You have absolutely no good reason to be making judgments about this mans game, or his teaching abilities. If you don't agree with his post, that's acceptable. Be you don't have to be disrespectful. You speak about what it takes to play pool at its highest level. Have we seen you on ESPN, TAR or BCN?

Big C,

I would be the first to admit I have a lot to learn about the game, but I resent you saying I have been disrespectful to anyone. I have my opinions, and they have theirs. How is that demeaning in any way ? Also I don't even know who you're refering too !

Dick

PS No, I'm too old for TAR or ESPN, but you can se me on AccuStats if you want to.
 
Last edited:
vagabond said:
Dick,
Excellant post. The stupid computer program did not allow me to give you a green rep.By the way what do u think of my ' Red Neck Aiming system '? please ask me if u are not familiar with my 'Red Neck Aiming system':cool:

No Vagabond, I am not familiar with your Red Neck Aimng System. Please enlighten me.

Thanks,

Dick
 
SJDinPHX said:
JB Cases said:
SJDinPHX said:
JB Cases said:
I, for one, am glad to see top level players weighing in on the subject and WISH that they had done it much sooner. We have top level players here like you and Shawn Putnam, Danny Harriman, John Schmidt and Corey Harper, and others.

The thing is that you are aware that most people on this site want to be better players. So we try to find what works.

Instead of going over the validity, claims, counter-claims, and so on I just have some questions for you that only top players can answer.

1. When you aim how do you do it?

2. If you can remember back to when you began learning this game were you taught how to aim? If so what did they teach you? [QUOTE/]

JB, you make some very good points. I would prefer not to dwell on my accomplishments, but on those I've tried to emulate. I have been more fortunate than most, to have seen the best, at their best. My association with them has elevated my game over the years, to the point where I have a level of confidence that is (was) unshakable. Sure, I've missed balls I should have made, I've missed many game balls for the cash. That is not a sin, it better prepares you for the next time it comes up.
My whole point in this thread is not to discourage the beginner, but to try and point him in a more benificial direction.
Learn the basics. If you think aiming systems will help you, go for it! But I know from experience that there is no "magic bullet". Once you learn the basics of pool, you either have the drive and desire to excell, or you don't.
It ain't rocket science.(well maybe it seems like it) You will need a certain amount of hand/eye coordination, and a good dose of guts and competetive spirit to overcome the competition you will encounter.
Some have it some don't. But don't think its like learning how to dance, its much tougher than that.

Dick


I think my wife, the ballet dancer, would disagree with you that learning pool is tougher then learning to dance :-)

No one is claiming that an aiming system is a magic bullet. However I ask you again what are "the basics" as pertains to aiming? I have lots of guts and determination and "heart" - just ask Dave "12 Squared" Gross. How does that competitive spirit make up for the fact that I am lining up wrong on a lot of my shots, or compensating wrong?

I have great coordination - I was a high diver diving off of 1ft square platforms 90ft in the air into 9ft of water inside of an 18ft circle - in between two diving boards. Still I spent most of my pool playing days missing a lot of shots that I thought were dead.

After Hal I started making a lot more of them and had more success. My stroke was still fishy, I still jumped up a lot but not as much as before thank to another habit I developed to help me stay down - I still twist my body a little trying to add body english but not quite as much.

For whatever reason Hal's aiming system clicked with me and it works and I make more balls, and particularly more "tough" shots.

I also use a technique Jimmy Reid showed me in the early 90s in Germany for shooting when the cueball is frozen to the rail or for shooting over other balls. A lot of times when I use it and players see me nail a tough shot they ask me why I did what I did. Before Jimmy showed me this technique then my percentage of making shots where the CB is frozen was quite erratic at best. Now it's at least 50% maybe a little better.

Now, again I am not asking about your accomplishments.

I will repeat the questions for the last time and if you don't want to answer them then that's fine but please don't Palinize me by ignoring them and talking about things I haven't asked you. :-)


1. When you aim how do you do it?

2. If you can remember back to when you began learning this game were you taught how to aim? If so what did they teach you?

I don't see how you are pointing the beginner in a more beneficial direction by stating things like it just to be there for a person to get good, and persistence and guts are the key.

You state that you are not interested in teaching a person how to stroke, aim, or any of the basics, yet you want to keep them away from those that do. You won't define what those basics are or what you think the proper way to teach them is just that no one who teaches a "system" will be teaching your grandkids. What about Buddy Hall's Clock System for applying spin? http://www.cuesight.com/redvbh.html

Is he qualified to teach your grandkids?

Is CJ Wiley not good enough?

How about Joe Tucker, he has taken down lots of champions, is he placed on the "do not train" list as well?

I know you can dab it - that's clear - but to imply that those who attest to the merits of these "aiming systems" are deluding themselves is a bit ridiculous. Some very smart people who can actually play a little have put some mental effort into these things and have found them acceptable to teach.

You told Steve (Pooltchr) that he has a lot to learn about pool if he thinks that there are only two things that affect whether a shot will be missed or not. That may or may not be true, what Steve said or what you said, but one thing is perfectly clear - if you don't have the right line then the prettiest stroke, the most guts, tons of heart, and pure determination are NOT going to help you to make a ball when you are out of line.

Good and great players learn to lock onto that line by whatever means they can. They see it as they are waking to the table. SOME people however have a harder time of it and although they can see it for the most part sometimes they have a disconnect between the path they see standing up and the path they lay the cue down on. Call it perception, dominant eye, left brain illusion, whatever you want to call it, but it happens and you know it happens.

A lot of these players are the ones who plateau and you think "Harry will never get any better". And then they learn a new way to approach the shot and suddenly what they see standing up connects with what they see bending down and sure enough they get better.

What is WRONG with that?
 
Neil said:
I couldn't sleep, so I got back up and saw this. Dick, apparently I didn't come across like I was trying to. I have no doubt as to your teaching credentials in one pocket. And, in the past, I have told people to go to you while they still can and pick your brain. There's a lot of great info there that they won't get anywhere else.

What I was referring to, was your comment about why teach aiming? They didn't in the past, and you greats still 'got there'. The same can be said for the one pocket skills you teach. One can still get there, it just takes a lifetime to do it. Get lessons from you, you knock years off the learning curve. Learn an aiming system, knock years off that part of the game.

Again, just to be clear-
IF YOU WANT TO LEARN ONE POCKET, GO SEE DICK!

Great point Neil, I hope I never get too old to learn new things, thanks for your very kind words.(not too sure I deserve them after being such an opinionated "know-it-all" to the "aiming system" guys.)

Dick
 
Last edited:
SJDinPHX said:
Aiming is a very small part of the game at its highest level. Any shortstop can fire balls in the hole. Pool at its highest level, exists mainly between the ears.

Dick


Who is talking about aiming systems being the magic pill to take someone from C-player to Pro?

No one.

You started this thread by saying that aiming systems don't exist and were pure hooey.

I don't recall one person who suggested that all someone needs is to learn to aim. However I think probably 99% of the board would agree that learning to aim is crucial to learning to play. The first thing you learn is how to hit the ball and the second thing you learn is how to hit in the right direction. So knowing how to AIM is clearly a very important part of being a good player.

Everyone knows that there are no pro players who DON'T know how to aim - it's impossible - unless you count someone a pro who gets their pro card simply by paying a membership fee. But for simplicity's sake there are no bonafide top notch players who don't have their aiming down pat, however they do it.

So please lets drop this red herring right here and focus on the part of your claim that aiming systems are hooey.

They aren't, they work (to what degree is under debate), and they are taught by well respected and qualified people along with all the other basics.
 
Aiming systems are great if they "click" with you. If you just don't get it then it will not matter what level of explanation is given because it will do you no good until it clicks with you. The chances of it working for you without you changing it somehow so you can understand it are fairly small as well.

The same can be said of golf. You can get a step by step, inch by inch explanation of how to swing a golf club to improve your aim. There are thousands of explanations on how to do this, but that does not mean you will get it or that it will work for you.

Because of these variables I've thrown aiming systems in the trash in favor of a lot of practice. The best aiming system a player can have is one they develop on their own, which is the one they will understand best.
 
SJDinPHX said:
, if you took a hundred kids' at their most formative years, (8 t0 12) and put them all with the best tutors in their respectve sports, when they reached maturity, you would probably have 15- 200 plus bowlers, and 5 or 10 scratch golfers, but you would be very lucky to come out with ONE top level pro pool player."
I rest my case.

I had many posts in the same vein as yours for most of my time here.. I thought Aiming was automatic.. you just knew... I lit up "AV8" pretty severely on the subject...

I was a good player I could sink balls and get out..

then I spent time with a world class coach..

I learned his stroke and his aiming system and my game went from being excited when I ran them all.. to being disappointed when I don't

thats a big jump.. I now expect to get out when I attempt to get out..

and I usually do.

he didn';t teach me how to play pool..

he taught me how to shoot pool...

those are two very different things

FWIW I already knew how to play .. I just get better results with the proven systems I was taught.

but then again I want it more than most people


give us 100 kids with the desire to be the best.. and those numbers change dramatically..

the guy who wants it will always get it more often than the guy who doesn't ...

I am starting to collect Aim Systems.. I have a few... when you can get more than one to agree on a line... you have the right line...

edit: Aim systems are like diamond systems.. you can never know too many...

just sayin..
 
Last edited:
gunzby said:
Aiming systems are great if they "click" with you. If you just don't get it then it will not matter what level of explanation is given because it will do you no good until it clicks with you. The chances of it working for you without you changing it somehow so you can understand it are fairly small as well.

The same can be said of golf. You can get a step by step, inch by inch explanation of how to swing a golf club to improve your aim. There are thousands of explanations on how to do this, but that does not mean you will get it or that it will work for you.

Because of these variables I've thrown aiming systems in the trash in favor of a lot of practice. The best aiming system a player can have is one they develop on their own, which is the one they will understand best.

yes, this is truly what it is all about in my opinion. When I was learning the aiming system I try to use now when I'm in trouble the particular steps in the method simply were not clicking with me. As soon as I understood the concept, I had to apply my own step in the aiming method that made it click for me... it was a simple adjustment in the method which uses the same exact principles and concepts, just a little tweak that made me click. I couldn't make a damn ball for 2 hours using my coaches system, but when I tweaked it for my own mind I couldn't miss.

Anything you are taught in this game absolutely has to click, and it has to click on a repeatable basis to where it becomes second nature and you can build on that foundation. I've found in my progression that that is what it truly takes to keep improving. Learn something new, then repeat it so many times that you don't have to think about it, repeat it some more, then learn something new... repeat.
 
Back
Top