As lorider and cello point out, it is very commonplace here to speak of APA players with disdain. It happens all the time.
It becomes tiresome. The people in our APA division here are like family of a sort. We have a great bunch of people playing here, and I'm proud to call them my friends. So yes, I get defensive when "APA player" is used to demean folks. Not talking about ability, I get that and don't argue the difference. I'm speaking about the inference that all APA players are three-eyed drunken inbreds.
Hey, if three-eyed drunken inbreds want to play pool, who are we to stop them? :wink:
Seriously, when we as an organization emphasize the social aspects of league play (and we do, with our formats and rules), we have to expect a certain number of noses to go up in the air, mostly from that part of the pool playing population that is super-competitive. That doesn't mean that these super-competitive people can't "pool together" for a good cause. Perhaps the social aspect of the APA leagues helps in that regard, but other than being able to get the word out to a large audience, I don't think the affiliation makes much of a difference here.
I think what's important here is that we recognize the ability of all kinds of people to set aside their differences for a moment to celebrate the life of someone with whom they all have something in common. It's a human thing, not a league thing.