I've now had some experience with APA, having played a couple of seasons and want to ask perhaps a dumb question - how do people actually drop SL in APA?!
There's numerous posts about sandbagging and handicap manipulation etc. but assuming the bud light "https://billiards.colostate.edu/faq/rating/apa-equalizer/" system is accurate, the 'applied score' mechanism pretty much prevents that, i.e. you can only sandbag if you actually lose, not just play a lot of innings.
Help me out in my thinking here with a scenario. From simplicity, suppose a player new to APA has played 20 matches with a 100% winrate and is now a SL7 (8-ball).
If the bud light system is correct, then any match player wins for the next 20 matches will have inning score of 1.1~1.9 applied, regardless of actual innings, i.e. their average innings will be <2 for any won game regardless. B/c system takes the 10 best scores from the last 20 scores... the only way for the player to drop is to accumulate 'losses' that will factor into the calcs, i.e. get on hill and lose, for a 1-2 score in APA, while playing poorly in those games and getting a high average innings count. Unless the inning count is super high, they may need a good number of these in the next 20 matches, while averaging higher than a 2+ inning/game.
Example, over the next 20 matches, player gets:
10 Lost matches
5 Won Matches at ~1.5 innings/game (via applied SL)
5 Lost-But Got-1-Point Matches at ~3 innings/game
Best 10 out of last 20 games = 5*1.5+5*3 = Avg innings/game of 2+ <- finally drop to SL6
In thinking through the implications of this, it appears that the system will move players up over time, fairly quickly too...but this doesn't seem fully right with what I'm observing. For example, I have a teammate with 10+ years in APA, currently a SL3, with a winrate that's about 40%. He has auto-magically have been able to achieve what I've described above over the course of 10 years, naturally?
Is this right? Does this align with what you've seen?
There's numerous posts about sandbagging and handicap manipulation etc. but assuming the bud light "https://billiards.colostate.edu/faq/rating/apa-equalizer/" system is accurate, the 'applied score' mechanism pretty much prevents that, i.e. you can only sandbag if you actually lose, not just play a lot of innings.
Help me out in my thinking here with a scenario. From simplicity, suppose a player new to APA has played 20 matches with a 100% winrate and is now a SL7 (8-ball).
If the bud light system is correct, then any match player wins for the next 20 matches will have inning score of 1.1~1.9 applied, regardless of actual innings, i.e. their average innings will be <2 for any won game regardless. B/c system takes the 10 best scores from the last 20 scores... the only way for the player to drop is to accumulate 'losses' that will factor into the calcs, i.e. get on hill and lose, for a 1-2 score in APA, while playing poorly in those games and getting a high average innings count. Unless the inning count is super high, they may need a good number of these in the next 20 matches, while averaging higher than a 2+ inning/game.
Example, over the next 20 matches, player gets:
10 Lost matches
5 Won Matches at ~1.5 innings/game (via applied SL)
5 Lost-But Got-1-Point Matches at ~3 innings/game
Best 10 out of last 20 games = 5*1.5+5*3 = Avg innings/game of 2+ <- finally drop to SL6
In thinking through the implications of this, it appears that the system will move players up over time, fairly quickly too...but this doesn't seem fully right with what I'm observing. For example, I have a teammate with 10+ years in APA, currently a SL3, with a winrate that's about 40%. He has auto-magically have been able to achieve what I've described above over the course of 10 years, naturally?
Is this right? Does this align with what you've seen?