Attention Moderators

[stan shuffett]

Post 385/387 in the John Schmidt thread:

ENGLISH is seeking to gather a following for antagonizing me on FACEBOOK.

He has crossed the line here in my opinion. I find this behavior absolutely unacceptable.

If he is allowed to rally others to take up matters on another person's FACEBOOK account, then who will his next victim be?

If he is allowed to do this without significant reprimand, then please remove my account here and all of my posts.
Thank you for attending to this issue.

Stan Shuffett

 

[ENGLISH!]

Post 385/387 in the John Schmidt thread:

ENGLISH is seeking to gather a following for antagonizing me on FACEBOOK.

He has crossed the line here in my opinion. I find this behavior absolutely unacceptable.

If he is allowed to rally others to take up matters on another person's FACEBOOK account, then who will his next victim be?

If he is allowed to do this without significant reprimand, then please remove my account here and all of my posts.
Thank you for attending to this issue.

Stan Shuffett

A Total mis-characterization.

The reference was to CTEers having a place to talk among themselves since the YouTube Channel is not allowing comments.

Hence the reference to Facebook possibly being that place just as other Pros have pages there because they can control the content.

If this was not so sad, It would be laughable.

The follow is a cut & paste from the John Schmidt thread

Yeah well, Anthony,

Some of their middle names is Hypocrisy.

They see a huge difference between them taking up the cause for the poor CTEers & resorting to all kinds of character assassinations because the CTEers have no place to talk among themselves because Stan will not allow comments on his YouTube Channel... (What about Facebook?)

vs

you, me, & others taking up the cause of all those that might be mislead by the inaccurate description & what it implies & simply wanting to get a rational & logical explanation.

Anyway,

You Take Care.

 

[stan shuffett]

A Total mis-characterization.

The reference was to CTEers having a place to talk among themselves since the YouTube Channel is not allowing comments.

Hence the reference to Facebook possibly being that place just as other Pros have pages there because they can control the content.

If this was not so sad, It would be laughable.

You might spin your way out of this but I think anyone that reads your comment can easily understand that your intentions were for rallying your cause to my FACE-BOOK page........I am tired of it. You would not dare do any this to my face!

I AM FED UP WITH YOUR YEAR-IN YEAR-OUT STALKING!

It is time that management puts a stop to your incessant campaign of negativity against me and my work.

Stan Shuffett

 

[Allen Brown]

I have no dog in this race and don't want to have one in it. Stan, the ignore function on the forum may be your best friend in this situation. I wish you both the best.

 

[ENGLISH!]

You might spin your way out of this but I think anyone that reads your comment can easily understand that your rally intentions to this controversy to my FACEBOOK page........I am tired of it. You would not dare do any this to my face!

I AM FED UP WITH YOUR YEAR-IN YEAR-OUT STALKING!

Stan Shuffett

If anyone is doing any stalking here it's you & you're the one trying to spin matters to the contrary of what they were.

Sad. Really sad on your part.

 

[stan shuffett]

If anyone is doing any stalking here it's you & you're the one trying to spin matters to the contrary of what they were.

Sad. Really sad on your part.

You crossed the line with your attempt to rally others in introducing your cancer to my Face Book page.

Stan Shuffett

 

[ENGLISH!]

Anyone that understands how language is used like in paragraphs etc. & how references are put into parenthesis can very easily & readily see the truth of this matter.

A complaint could have been made PRIVATELY to the moderators of this site.

But...

Instead a PUBLIC THREAD was opened.

Again... I think most can see what the desire & intentions are with this.

I sincerely hope that you have a professional language expert as the editor of your book.

 

[stan shuffett]

Anyone that understands how language is used like in paragraphs etc. & how references are put into parenthesis can very easily & readily see the truth of this matter.

A complaint could have been made PRIVATELY to the moderators of this site.

But...

Instead a PUBLIC THREAD was opened.

Again... I think most can see what the desire & intentions are with this.

I sincerely hope that you have a professional language expert as the editor of you book.

Let me make one thing crystal clear. I am tired of your BS! You crossed the line when you called for a rally to visit me on my FACE BOOK Acct:.......

LEAVE ME THE HELL ALONE!

Stan Shuffett

 

[ENGLISH!]

I made no call of any "rally" to anyone's Facebook page.

Instead it was a reference (a question) regarding CTEers having a place to talk among themselves, as that was one of Sloppy Pocket's reasons for his 'Crusade'.

I did not even mention your name specifically or anyone's name specifically in reference to Facebook.

 

[duckie]

You might spin your way out of this but I think anyone that reads your comment can easily understand that your intentions were for rallying your cause to my FACE-BOOK page........I am tired of it. You would not dare do any this to my face!

I AM FED UP WITH YOUR YEAR-IN YEAR-OUT STALKING!

It is time that management puts a stop to your incessant campaign of negativity against me and my work.

Stan Shuffett

Nope, its all in your head. I read it and it isn't anything like your are implying

You got issues.

 

[stan shuffett]

Nope, its all in your head. I read it and it isn't anything like your are implying

You got issues.

If it is all on me and in my head then all the moderators have to do is ask me to discontinue my membership here. If I misread his intentions that badly, I want to be punished.

Stan Shuffett

 

[ENGLISH!]

Nope, its all in your head. I read it and it isn't anything like your are implying

You got issues.

I am starting to think the same thing, Greg.

Perhaps he is just not equipped to handle the public fish bowl that he has placed himself into by describing it in the provocative & controversial manner that he did.

CJ Wiley took much from some while he was here because of some of what he was putting out, but he could certainly handle it & realized that it was he himself that willingly placed himself into the fish bowl.

I'm starting to get worried & will certainly pray for him.

 

[stan shuffett]

I am starting to think the same thing, Greg.

Perhaps he is just not equipped to handle the public fish bowl that he has placed himself into by describing it in the provocative & controversial manner that he did.

CJ Wiley took much from some while he was here because of some of what he was putting out, but he could certainly handle it & realized that it was he himself that placed himself into the fish bowl willingly.

I'm starting to get worried & will certainly pray for him.

If the moderators give you the go-ahead for your continued harassment of me, then I will be gone.....It is coming to a head very quickly for me, not sure about you, but for me, I will not be a part of your insanity any longer.

Stan Shuffett

 

[GoldenFlash]

I could see it coming.......

If the moderators give you the go-ahead for your continued harassment of me, then I will be gone.....It is coming to a head very quickly for me, not sure about you, but for me, I will not be a part of your insanity any longer.
Stan Shuffett

Dammit...what a shameful waste and loss of a valuable pool information resource.
All because of the hassles and nonsense coming from a born loser (in my opinion).
English, you and your posse really know how to screw things up...and you've been at it for YEARS??
:angry:

 

[ENGLISH!]

Since you referred to me specifically...

I am not a born loser in any manner at all. In fact, there are no such individuals that are born losers.

All that I have done is explained why it is not 'an objective aiming system'.

When others have said that I & others were/are incorrect, all I (& others) have done is asked for a rational & logical explanation of how so.

The question is...

What is it that is OBJECTIVE that indicates the final actual shot line to the shooter?

It is NOT my fault...

that that question can not be answered by anyone & has not been answered by anyone in any rational logical manner of explanation.

It is also NOT my fault...

that it seems that rather many do NOT understand the difference between what is subjective & what is objective.

 

[Tony_in_MD]

Since you referred to me specifically...

All that I have done is explained why it is not 'an objective aiming system'.

In your opinion which in reality does not mean much, considering your a faceless, no name, who has in his short time on AZ managed to alienate the majority of the posters here. Your brief foray into the main forum opened the eyes of a lot of posters that don't frequent the aiming section. Of course many threads where you are at your worst, become locked, so future readers can't get the backstory on you.

All you have is your purported reason, which is usually presented in long rambling nonsensical discourses containing golf stories, lines from movies, and your "I have been playing and using english since I was 13"

The only people who like you are the 40 year old teenagers who enjoy looking at provocative pictures of women and young ladies on AZ to cover their tracks from their significant others. You have certainly found your niche there.

Maybe Duckie likes you, since you share the same thoughts on CTE, but even he will turn his back on you when discussing CJ's TOI.

I have said my peace finally, though there is a lot more I can say. I will close with this, remember Rick (or whatever your name is), you reap what you sow.

 

[ENGLISH!]

In your opinion which in reality does not mean much, considering your a faceless, no name, who has in his short time on AZ managed to alienate the majority of the posters here. Your brief foray into the main forum opened the eyes of a lot of posters that don't frequent the aiming section. Of course many threads where you are at your worst, become locked, so future readers can't get the backstory on you.

All you have is your reason, which is usually presented in rambling long discourses containing golf stories, lines from movies, and your "I have been playing and using english since I was 13"

The only people who like you are the 40 year old teenagers who like to look at provocative pictures of women and young ladies.

Of course maybe Duckie likes you too, since you share the same thoughts on CTE, but even he will turn his back on you when discussing CJ's TOI.

I have said my peace finally. Remember Rick, you reap what you sow.

Same old exaggeration of extremes, mis-characterizations, YOUR opinions, etc.

ALL personal affronts to divert from the topic at hand involving the supposed 'objective aiming system' & the question surrounding it that YOU can not answer in any rational logical manner of explanation, even though you are a 'certified' instructor.

Some know from where your hostility toward me REALLY stems & why you've been on your vendetta.

PJ, Duckie/Greg & I see eye to eye on this issue & not on others. The truth is the truth about each issue. Even family members & friends do not have to & do not actually agree on every single issue.

If you are basing YOUR truths of matters on WHO is espousing what, then you're not making intelligent independent decisions.

One should do their own thinking & not be told what matters are & what & how to think.

 

[Tony_in_MD]

More rambling and deflection on your part, this thread is about Stan complaining about YOUR treatment of him to the mods. What exaggerations existed in my post?

Do you not post pictures of young ladies to the enjoyment of the 40 year old teenagers.

Do you not write long, rambling posts?

Yes I am a certified instructor, and I would NEVER begin to give you an answer to anything because you won't like it.

I also learned long ago, if I did not fully understand a method, and implement it in my game, I don't comment on it, nor teach it. I don't use CTE, have not learned it, but when I do, I will see Stan himself, because I know how I learn, and I don't let my ego get in the way of acquiring new knowledge. You say it....why don't you live it.

Vendetta, is not a nice word Rick, especially since I am Italian american. I have no patience for two faced nameless trolls, who continue to harass a good man, who has done more for this game, then you could in 10 lifetimes.

As far as whatever you think my hostility towards you stems from, I don't care, and you are probably wrong in that too. One thing for sure it is not your made up thoughts of instructors banding together.

No Rick it is all on you and your behavior since you have joined.

p.s. I am sure playing in what you desire, I imagine you sitting in a dark room smiling and laughing inside how you got folks stirred up again. Remember Rick, when you do go away, no one will miss, or remember you here. You must have a sad and pathetic life to want to create this chaos on this forum since you arrived.

Same old exaggeration of extremes, mis-characterizations, YOUR opinions, etc.

ALL personal affronts to divert from the topic at hand involving the supposed 'objective aiming system' & the question surrounding it that YOU can not answer in any rational logical manner of explanation, even though you are a 'certified' instructor.

Some know from where your hostility toward me REALLY stems & why you've been on your vendetta.

 

[ENGLISH!]

More rambling and deflection on your part, this thread is about Stan complaining about YOUR treatment of him to the mods. What exaggerations existed in my post?

Do you not post pictures of young ladies to the enjoyment of the 40 year old teenagers.

Do you not write long, rambling posts?

Yes I am a certified instructor, and I would NEVER begin to give you an answer to anything because you won't like it.

I also learned long ago, if I did not fully understand a method, and implement it in my game, I don't comment on it, nor teach it. I don't use CTE, have not learned it, but when I do, I will see Stan himself, because I know how I learn, and I don't let my ego get in the way of acquiring new knowledge. You say it....why don't you live it.

Vendetta, is not a nice word Rick, especially since I am Italian american. I have no patience for two faced nameless trolls, who continue to harass a good man, who has done more for this game, then you could in 10 lifetimes.

As far as whatever you think my hostility towards you stems from, I don't care, and you are probably wrong in that too. One thing for sure it is not your made up thoughts of instructors banding together.

No Rick it is all on you and your behavior since you have joined.

This thread is about the OP misrepresenting the truth of matters for an Ulterior Motive.

Your post was not on THAT topic at ALL.

Hence your 'vendetta' based on past happenings perhaps along with other matters.

The Big Picture issue is about the inaccurate asserted description & claim & the FACT that no proponent nor the OP has ever provided any rational logical explanation that would support that description.

Because of that FACT, it has been attempted to make ME the issue...

because I continue to ask for that rational explanation or a retraction of the inaccurate description.

Twists & Distortions, Mis-Characterizations, Personal Disparagements & Affronts, Personal Insults, etc. ALL in order to DIVERT from the FACT...

that that rational logical explanation simply can not be provided because it simply does NOT exist because the description is inaccurate...

& hence it can NOT be rationally or logically supported.

Mike Drop!

 

[DTL]

...................