Best Camera for Cue Photos

RDCustomCues

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Well i am in the market for a new camera under $400-500 perfer a lot cheaper if the quality is good to take pics of my cues. My Kodak 4mp has about had it. I bought a 12mp KodakZ1275 and it really appears that its lacking in photo quality. I cannot find a way to turn the flash of even in a bright area. So back to the store it goes. Any suggestions. $300 my target range 4-5 being max
 
Megapixels are far from everything, optics, ccd sensors are vastly more important to image quality, mp's basically just determine the max size of the picture. Cannon is my preffered choice for a general use hobbyist camera. What are your needs other than taking pictures of your cue? Size, zoom? Smaller cameras usually cant use aadditional zoom leneses, what it comes with is what your stuck with, also smaller cameras are more prone to "red eye", though thats easy to fix via software.

Heres a suggestion for a 300 buck full size

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8510989&type=product&id=1186005750966

and a smaller one
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8297602&type=product&id=1172881524792

quality 12 mps are still in the $450+ price range. Rememebr that lighting has as much to do with a quality photo as the camera, natural sunlight will do wonders in bringing out the subtle details and nuances of your cue.

I know its not a cue, but it is a pretty piece of wood,

indoor overhead lighting
IMG_5344.jpg


Natural sunlight
IMG_5320.jpg


IMG_5317.jpg
 
I used a canon powershot SD870IS elph to take the pics of my carmeli (link in my sig). It has several great features that are quite helpful (like digital macro), and is VERY easy to use. They are 299 on newegg.com
 
A $50 2MP camera with macro will take excellent cue pictures. Megapixels are overrated.

This isn't a great pic but it was taken with no flash with a very low end camera.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2858.JPG
    IMG_2858.JPG
    49.2 KB · Views: 274
Another pic from same camera. (Man I miss Summer)
 

Attachments

  • Pool3.JPG
    Pool3.JPG
    80.5 KB · Views: 201
Hal, just before I left Japan, I spent the last two months doing extensive research of digital cameras and I really learned a great deal. The other posters are correct when saying megapixels are overrated. The trend today seems to cramming as many MPs into a camera as they possibly can, and doing it with the same small sized sensors in the case of your point and shoot type cameras. Most camera makers use this as a selling point, when the truth is, they're actually decreasing the quality of the pics, and the ability of point and shoots to do well in low light (non-flash) situations. Fuji has a Super CCD Sensor set up in their f40 and Finepix s6000 models along with others, and this sensor is very well known specifically for it's outstanding performance in low light situations. Simply put, you can shoot pics at higher ISO settings, and still get fairly clean shots, whereas almost all other point and shoot cameras get very grainy with ISO settings above 200. The other option you have would be to get into a camera that isn't particularly a great performer with higher ISO settings, but as long as it has Optical (not digital) Image Stabilization, you can keep the camera at a lower ISO setting, and the stabilization will allow you get a decent pic in the lower light situation without a flash.
Cannon is without doubt the most popular maker out there, and their whole "IS" camera come with stabilization. Particularly, the S3 or the S5. They both come with IS, so you would be able to manually keep your ISO set lower, a slower shutter speed, and get away without a flash. I ended up buying the Fuji s8000 fd, and I'm extremely happy with the results. It comes with a pretty nice wide angle lens so I can fit more into a shot without having to take any steps back. Haven't used it to take any cue pics yet, but as for now this baby seems to do really well.
Good luck,
dave
 
No need to spend a bunch on a camera for cue pics, IMHO

I am willing to bet that one can buy a camera for less than $150 and take cue pics that are more than adequate for posting on the Internet. As long as it has a macro mode, and most do, what you need then is adequate light and technique. Look at what Hal did with a very inexpensive camera. If you check eBay, you will find many 100% positive sellers with sub $100 cameras which would work fine for cue pics. One tip is to try using a tripod, even a $20 model will do, so that you can use slow shutter speeds in low light situations. You might also try an inexpensive halogen light to illuminate the cue.
 
Well seeing that I will be using it also for taking pics on vacation and family pics I bit the bullet and just got back from BestBuy they opened at 8am today :) I got a Canon Rebel XTi 10.1MP SLR camera they wanted $699 I got them to match a online competitor for $589 . This is far from what I intended to spend but wife wanted something with a fast shutter speed to catch those quick shots thats easily missed with the kiddos. So this fit the bill. A little hard on the wallet after the battery is charge I will test how well it really takes pics...
 
You did well with the DSLR

RDCustomCues said:
Well seeing that I will be using it also for taking pics on vacation and family pics I bit the bullet and just got back from BestBuy they opened at 8am today :) I got a Canon Rebel XTi 10.1MP SLR camera they wanted $699 I got them to match a online competitor for $589 . This is far from what I intended to spend but wife wanted something with a fast shutter speed to catch those quick shots thats easily missed with the kiddos. So this fit the bill. A little hard on the wallet after the battery is charge I will test how well it really takes pics...

You did good and will be very happy you spent the extra cash and got the DSLR. No more pushing the button and having to wait for a second before the camera snaps the photo. on my last vacation to Disney I took over a thousand pictures a day. This camrea will be great for cue photo's but just remember that lighting is key. Best of luck on what will become a new obsession for you and your wife. I use my camera almost everyday now. Here are a few samples I took of one of my cues recently. These pictures have not been "touched up" by any photo editing software they are straight out of the camera.

DSC_0101.jpg


DSC_0084.jpg


DSC_0099.jpg
 
Now that looks nice. Lots of features on this camera. All I have to do now is get a good photo editior I use Microsoft Digital Image Pro 9 and simply hate it for cropping and resizing its so so. I think my favorite image editor for making sales images use to be Microsoft Picture It Platinum 2002. You could crop and resize the image without any loss in photo quality. If I resize in Digital Image Pro my image quality looks like crap.
 
Back
Top