That's the first I've ever heard, interesting. I'm trying to put into context what you've said. Do you mean that when they do a story on someone or something, the story heavily mentions or spot lights those that advertise with them? I appreciate your input, thanks.poolsnark said:One of the reasons that BD is thought to be a "cleaner" magazine than IP is that there appears to be less of a blur between editorial and advertising. Some of the articles in IP allegedly fall under the category of "advertorial" even though they are not listed as such.
That being said, both magazines have their merits and their faults.