Spot on, that's what I found.Well I’m one that’s sensitive to a cue’s balance point, so I’ll take a feeble stab.
I like a rearward balanced cue, meaning on 58-59” cues, if balancing on two fingers, the neutral point is around 17” from the buttcap. I think (but not sure) that most cue makers & players would consider 18” as “neutrally” balanced, and 19-20” = forward balanced. Supposedly rearward balance promotes more power & natural stroke, fwd balanced promotes more stability, especially for rail shots. Lots of threads about this over the years…
My personal conclusion is its all subjective, and no “right” answer. I like house cues & full splices and have long arms, and I think this is why I like rearward balanced cues. But when I play with a nice forward balanced cue, I like it also. I guess I’m a mess…![]()
That natural balance, often works best when selecting woods. If you have a heavy wood at the front and a lighter wood in the middle, and the same, with light at the front and heavy in the middle, that was the norm. I believe before coring cues became mainstram.
Now you can create any type of balance no matter, the wood on the outside.with the shaft, pin and joint collar deciding the rest