If a player already has a "refined technique", why in the world would he be looking around to change ANYTHING?I'm smarter 'cause I got this directly from the description.CTE requires "rhetorical" re-methodizing to somehow accomplish what seems like less than accomplished players' ingrained ability. CTE does interfere with shooting technique though - to the degree that one may have to rebuild their already refined technique.
Why doesn't that player just keep on emulating a "Josh Filler Machine" and be happy with it?
To me it sounds like "trying to fix something that ain't broke".
I, myself, needed a new method of aiming/playing because the horsedung I'd been fed for decades out of those phony Mosconi Books was dead in the water. (that is not a slap at Willie Mosconi either). He didn't get to be one of the best players that ever lived either by using that junk in those little books.
I NEEDED something to "interfere with my shooting technique" (your words). The shooting technique I had was unrefined and lame.
After all is said and done, it's still a matter of what a person decides to be satisfied and happy with using. Be it Ghosty Ball, Poolology, Contact Points, CTE, TOI, or even the "Jelly Bean Method".
Last edited: