Center Pocket Music: angled face and stepping the cueball

I'm smarter 'cause I got this directly from the description. :D CTE requires "rhetorical" re-methodizing to somehow accomplish what seems like less than accomplished players' ingrained ability. CTE does interfere with shooting technique though - to the degree that one may have to rebuild their already refined technique.
If a player already has a "refined technique", why in the world would he be looking around to change ANYTHING?
Why doesn't that player just keep on emulating a "Josh Filler Machine" and be happy with it?
To me it sounds like "trying to fix something that ain't broke".
I, myself, needed a new method of aiming/playing because the horsedung I'd been fed for decades out of those phony Mosconi Books was dead in the water. (that is not a slap at Willie Mosconi either). He didn't get to be one of the best players that ever lived either by using that junk in those little books.
I NEEDED something to "interfere with my shooting technique" (your words). The shooting technique I had was unrefined and lame.
After all is said and done, it's still a matter of what a person decides to be satisfied and happy with using. Be it Ghosty Ball, Poolology, Contact Points, CTE, TOI, or even the "Jelly Bean Method".
 
Last edited:
If a player already has a "refined technique", why in the world would he be looking around to change ANYTHING?
Why doesn't that player just keep on emulating a "Josh Filler Machine" and be happy with it?
To me it sounds like "trying to fix something that ain't broke".
I, myself, needed a new method of aiming/playing because the horsedung I'd been fed for decades out of those phony Mosconi Books was dead in the water. (that is not a slap at Willie Mosconi either). He didn't get to be one of the best players that ever lived either by using that junk in those little books.
I NEEDED something to "interfere with my shooting technique" (your words). The shooting technique I had was unrefined and lame.
After all is said and done, it's still a matter of what a person decides to be satisfied and happy with using. Be it Ghosty Ball, Poolology, Contact Points, CTE, TOI, or even the "Jelly Bean Method".
Wasn't stepping on your methods or motivations. CTE does require special techniques to accommodate the method. You can't spiel around the fact it's a Rube Goldberg system - how many years in the works?
 
If a player already has a "refined technique", why in the world would he be looking around to change ANYTHING?
Exactly why I abandoned my efforts to learn the CTE technique.

Poolology didn't require me to alter my fundamentals. Only shoot in a given direction based a equation.

In the end, I had zero interest in adopting any real change. That would have been foolish, and honestly I'm being kind at suggesting I would have gained any potting proficiency from my established base line. I really just wanted to speak from experience with CTE as I can with Poolology or "Ghosty Ball".
 
Exactly why I abandoned my efforts to learn the CTE technique.

Poolology didn't require me to alter my fundamentals. Only shoot in a given direction based a equation.

In the end, I had zero interest in adopting any real change. That would have been foolish, and honestly I'm being kind at suggesting I would have gained any potting proficiency from my established base line. I really just wanted to speak from experience with CTE as I can with Poolology or "Ghosty Ball".
Congratulations on discovering something that made you happy, content, satisfied, and better............WITHOUT having anything to do with that dreaded horrible stupid unworkable method of aiming a pool shot called "CTE".(y)(y)(y)
Picture of How Much I Care.jpg
 
Congratulations on discovering something that made you happy, content, satisfied, and better............WITHOUT having anything to do with that dreaded horrible stupid unworkable method of aiming a pool shot called "CTE".(y)(y)(y)
Not sure why you would bash your aiming system of choice in such a manner. It very interesting that you consider me some level of hater but have trashed CTE more than I ever have in just this single post.
 
Except you don't use the tip/CB contact point to aim - you aim by looking at where the CB needs to go. Your 1/2 mm range on the CB = 1/4" per diamond distance from CB to OB (1" over 4 diamonds) - that's what aiming deals with.

The tiny tip/CB contact point range isn't an aiming advantage; it's a stroke challenge - no matter what aiming method you use.


Using the center-to-edge line along with the fractions line is the one thing about CTE that intrigues me. If I was a fractions aimer I might try incorporating it. I agree it's a good "anchor" alignment for any aiming method, but I think CTE overcomplicates its use.

pj
chgo
Only the center to edge line is not used anymore except I think on the B perception. Try to keep up. ;)
 
You're more than entitled to your opinion but you don't know the nuances of my game and the level of play that I expect from myself, so your thoughts really hold no water in this regard. "Concern" is a strong word honestly. I really just wanted to give CTE an equal shake to my minimal effort with Poolology. Once I realized I'd have to revamp my process to do so, then my indifference simply took over.
This made me chuckle. Sounds like something out of a novel. "Suddenly, I was overcome by a wave of indifference." lol
 
Your deflection has failed as well.
You republicans seem to be overcome with that. How many years have you guys been at it anyway?
NOTE: I have to use the word "republican" because according to popular trends that is the dumbest term I can use to describe you in this forum without getting my loud mouth ass thrown out of here.
I love you🥰
And thank you for participating. (y) (y)
View attachment 609127
Low's first good post! Only took 3 years. 😜
 
Back
Top