Challenge on the Green Tournament

renard

Play in these conditions?
Silver Member
Here locally in Dayton they have started a tournament called "The Dayton Challenge on the Green." It's a team barbox tournament set up like the Sleepless in Sandusky tournament in that it's triple elimination by BCA rules. It was held at the Holiday Inn with the "Open division" team cutoff at 64 mens teams and 32 womens teams. Team entry fee is $528 per mens open team and that includes 2 hotel rooms. Open womens team entry fee $378 includes one hotel room. An additional $20 Green Fee allows you to play on the tables as they are opened 24/7.

click on link/ then click "tournaments" left side panel/ then click the "pool" panel/ Then click on "Dayton Challenge on the Green" for info

http://clarkvending.net/home page/new_home_page.htm

Teams from West Virginia, and Pennsylvania attended this inaugural event and it was a damn good time. But the word of mouth was not spread far enough and the "Open Mens" only fielded 16 teams. But I will say that the strength of the field was greater through and through than what I have experienced during three Sleepless in Sandusky tournaments at Lake Erie.

The promoters do have kinks to work out in their format but I think the feedback they have received should eliminate these minor bumps in the road.

The tables were Coopers and Shelti's and all of them played pretty good for barbox's. They played true and fast to medium speed. (With the exception of slow table #16.)Mini tournament's were held throughout the tournament with many youth players entering to test their metal. (These kids play good by the way!)

My team had the luck of losing to the Ohio State open champion team in the beginning and lost by two balls. Then we had to play the Phenoms a Middletown team that just ranout seemly at will on us. (Four runouts in the first seven games.) That team included fellow AZ'er Joe Koontz who ranout twice in his three tries. (Great shooting Joe!!!)

So after Friday was over we found ourselves with two losses on the Triple low end bracket right off the bat. Saturday morning we won our next two matches easily not having the finish the last 5 and 3 games as the matches are decided by point total and are over mathematically impossible to win.

Low and behold we had to play the Phenoms again. They pulled out to an early lead again but we came back and soon had the lead ourselves. The match ended in a tie with a final flurry of wins the Phenoms produced. A one game winner take all tie breaker game was played with John making a fantastic out to beat us. (Sorry Joe don't remember John's last name or if he would want it posted here.)

I played well, as did our team, but you always remember your mistakes. (Coulda, woulda, shouda) I had 4 break and runs in twelve games which is good but I just do not possess a great break like Joe does.

I just thought I would share my thoughts of this tournament and hope that any AZ'ers with teams close enough would enter this event next year. This was a place that changes up the competition in team events and I enjoyed it completely. I get tired of playing the same old teams and these teams were different and strong.

I don't expect many responses just wanted a "Good read" for tha AZ'ers out there....
 
Last edited:
Scott,


Thanks for the kind words. You are right, that was the stiffest competition that I have seen team per team in any state or local team tourney that I have ever attended.

Scott "Renard" also played very well. His team was very solid, we just got a few more rolls than they did. We had a great time overall, we went out two rounds after our final match against your team "shooting with the enemy."

The tourney is open to any Valley or BCA team that chooses to take their chances, the end victor in the Open tourney was led along by the fantastic cuemaker, Richard Harris. He certainly knows how to handle a cue at the table as well as at the lathe.

We were fortunate enough to win the Clarks Challenge on the Green, the AA division. That was for the teams within Bill Clark's league only. There were no easy matches but we were fortunate to pull it out in the final round. The victors received a nice sum of cash to send us to Vegas as well as a very nice team plaque. Vegas, here we come.

Peace to all, JBK
 
In my opinion the tournament was at best "ok". This is coming from one of the members of the winning team I might add. Some of the tables played like a turd (super slow) while others played super fast! No table lights at all, just ceiling lights. That didn't bother me but I'm sure it bothered others. We were kind of disappointed that only 16 teams showed up for the open. I feel Clark did a very poor job of promoting the tournament outside the BCA leagues it runs. It was run ok, not great, but not horrible. It was kind of upsetting to me that they wanted to impose a 2 hour time limit on a 15 game format match when they could have easily made use of extra table to finish matches. I also hate the 15 game format. I think the best teams finished at the top, but 15 games is way too short. I would have hated to see a big field this year due to the number of tables and how it was run. Overall, it was GREAT since we won!!:) I think Richard was going to put our team photo on his website (poolcues.net) sometime in the near future.
 
Last edited:
gutshot said:
In my opinion the tournament was at best "ok". This is coming from one of the members of the winning team I might add. Some of the tables played like a turd (super slow) while others played super fast! No table lights at all, just ceiling lights. That didn't me but I'm sure it bothered others. We were kind of disappointed that only 16 teams showed up for the open. I feel Clark did a very poor job of promoting the tournament outside the BCA leagues it runs. It was run ok, not great, but not horrible. It was kind of upsetting to me that they wanted to impose a 2 hour time limit on a 15 game format match when they could have easily made use of extra table to finish matches. I also hate the 15 game format. I think the best teams finished at the top, but 15 games is way too short. I would have hated to see a big field this year due to the number of tables and how it was run. Overall, it was GREAT since we won!!:) I think Richard was going to put our team photo on his website (poolcues.net) sometime in the near future.

I agree with you Gutshot on everything you said and I know they got tired of hearing it. Because everyone of us repeated it to them. Angel even told me, "I know, we will make some changes, this is the first time we ran this type of event (the open)."

Even losing out before the money, and the "why are they keeping us one one table"; couldn't dampen the fun I had. We will see if it changes... my guess? It will...
 
Last edited:
I too agree, but..

I agree with the format issues and playing on one table.. Still not bad for a first year event. I can't complain because I had a blast overall. It will surely get better and better each year.

I can still appreciate all of the hard work that Angel & the crew went through in running the tournament. It is a thankless job, but they still deserve a ton of credit for putting it on. I could think of a lot of worse things to be doing on my weekends..:D

Peace, Joe


gutshot said:
In my opinion the tournament was at best "ok". This is coming from one of the members of the winning team I might add. Some of the tables played like a turd (super slow) while others played super fast! No table lights at all, just ceiling lights. That didn't me but I'm sure it bothered others. We were kind of disappointed that only 16 teams showed up for the open. I feel Clark did a very poor job of promoting the tournament outside the BCA leagues it runs. It was run ok, not great, but not horrible. It was kind of upsetting to me that they wanted to impose a 2 hour time limit on a 15 game format match when they could have easily made use of extra table to finish matches. I also hate the 15 game format. I think the best teams finished at the top, but 15 games is way too short. I would have hated to see a big field this year due to the number of tables and how it was run. Overall, it was GREAT since we won!!:) I think Richard was going to put our team photo on his website (poolcues.net) sometime in the near future.
 
Back
Top