CTE/ProOne Robotics

[Patrick Johnson]

So nothing specific, just conjecture again? Who could have predicted?

My post was very specific; you just aren't able to tell what the topic is. I could have predicted that.

pj
chgo

 

[pablocruz]

My post was very specific; you just aren't able to tell what the topic is. I could have predicted that.

pj
chgo

Let me try and speak your language! If the cueball was behind the headstring up against the rail and the object ball was below the footstring
again on the rail, both on the center diamond on a 9 ft table. What would be a successful bridge length? I would assume it would have to be infinitely long by your post!

 

[Patrick Johnson]

pablocruz:
Let me try and speak your language! If the cueball was behind the headstring up against the rail and the object ball was below the footstring again on the rail, both on the center diamond on a 9 ft table. What would be a successful bridge length? I would assume it would have to be infinitely long by your post!

Here's the post you're asking about:

Me:
Pivoting from the 90/90 line, the successful ratio of bridge/CB to CB/OB distances changes with cut angle. For cuts fuller than about half ball the bridge/CB distance actually must be greater than the CB/OB distance - and it rises quickly from there to infinity (for a straight shot).

I've highlighted the parts you missed - they say that the bridge length ratio depends on cut angle, not on distance. Apparently we still don't speak the same language.

pj
chgo

 

[pablocruz]

Pivoting from the 90/90 line, the successful ratio of bridge/CB to CB/OB distances changes with cut angle. For cuts fuller than about half ball the bridge/CB distance actually must be greater than the CB/OB distance - and it rises quickly from there to infinity (for a straight shot).
pj
chgo

Try again!! Bonehead!!

 

[rhyno]

Here's the post you're asking about:

I've highlighted the parts you missed - they say that the bridge length ratio depends on cut angle, not on distance. Apparently we still don't speak the same language.

pj
chgo

if you stood in exactly the same position for every shot(parrallel to the shot, ie straight) and aimed 90/90 the your point would be valid.
you don't so its not.i'm not going to explain it as i can't be doing with then having to post another 20 comments explaining myself to you

 

[pablocruz]

Here's the post you're asking about:

I've highlighted the parts you missed - they say that the bridge length ratio depends on cut angle, not on distance. Apparently we still don't speak the same language.

pj
chgo

Pat we can all play the game of taking everything out of context!! But that's not what most are here for!! If you have so many unanswered questions from others, why don't you phone Stan himself? I'm sure he will try and answer any and all of your questions!!

 

[Mt. Cheverest]

Pat we can all play the game of taking everything out of context!! But that's not what most are here for!! If you have so many unanswered questions from others, why don't you phone Stan himself? I'm sure he will try and answer any and all of your questions!!

No, that makes too much sense.

 

[Patrick Johnson]

...If you have so many unanswered questions

Did I ask a question?

pj
chgo